Dergiler / Haseki Tıp Bülteni / 2021 / Cilt: 59 - Sayı: 5

Evaluation of Pupil Diameter and Midline Shift in Patients Undergoing Decompressive Craniectomy

Sayfa
431–435
Yayın Tarihi
2022-10-17
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

The timing of DC is important in terms of its effect on mortality.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Aim: Intracranial pressure may increase due to reasons such as head trauma, intracranial hematoma, cerebral infarction, and cerebral edema.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Methods: Data from the hospital automation system and patient file records were retrospectively reviewed between 2017 and 2019, and 57 patients who underwent DC for raised intracranial pressure.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:The timing of DC is important in terms of its effect on mortality.
🔬Tür:Literatür & Derleme Çalışması
📍Kapsam:2017 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

Aim: Intracranial pressure may increase due to reasons such as head trauma, intracranial hematoma, cerebral infarction, and cerebral edema. Decompressive craniectomy (DC) may be preferred in the treatment. Our study aims to examine the time of DC and the effect of pupil diameter and midline shift on mortality. Methods: Data from the hospital automation system and patient file records were retrospectively reviewed between 2017 and 2019, and 57 patients who underwent DC for raised intracranial pressure. Fifty-seven patients who underwent DC, whose neurological examination and pupil diameter were recorded after increased intracranial pressure, were evaluated. Results: The mean age of 57 patients was 50.38±19.91 years. The patients’ mean preoperative Glasgow coma score (GCS) was 8.85±3.6 and the mean GCS at discharge was 8.96±6.0. The mean cranial midline shifts of the patients were 7.88±5.35. 49.1% of the patients who underwent DC survived. Conclusion: Mortality rate is lower in patients who underwent DC compared to patients with isochoric pupil, anisocoric, and mid dilated patients. The timing of DC is important in terms of its effect on mortality.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

AKPINAR, A., ERDOĞAN, U., BERİKOL, G. (2022). Evaluation of Pupil Diameter and Midline Shift in Patients Undergoing Decompressive Craniectomy. Haseki Tıp Bülteni, Cilt: 59 - Sayı: 5, 431–435. https://ajindex.com/articles/534984

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (14)

  1. Hutchinson PJ, Kolias AG, Timofeev IS, et al. Trial of Decompressive Craniectomy for Traumatic Intracranial Hypertension. N Engl J Med 2016;22:1119-30
  2. Badri S, Chen J, Barber J, et al. Mortality and long-term functional outcome associated with intracranial pressure after traumatic brain injury. Intensive Care Med 2012;38:1800-9
  3. Schur S, Martel P, Marcoux J. Optimal bone flap size for decompressive craniectomy for refractory increased intracranial pressure in traumatic brain injury: taking the patient’s head size into account. World Neurosurg 2020;137:430-6
  4. Panourias IG, Skiadas PK, Sakas DE, Marketos SG. Hippocrates: A Pioneer in the Treatment of Head Injuries. Neurosurgery 2005;57:181-9
  5. Brown DA, Wijdicks EFM. Decompressive craniectomy in acute brain injury. Handb Clin Neurol 2017;140:299-318
  6. Timofeev I, Hutchinson PJ. Outcome after surgical decompression of severe traumatic brain injury. Injury 2006;37:1125-32
  7. Qiu W, Guo C, Shen H, et al. Effects of unilateral decompressive craniectomy on patients with unilateral acute post-traumatic brain swelling after severe traumatic brain injury. Crit Care 2009;13:185
  8. Cooper DJ, Rosenfeld JV, Murray L, et al. Decompressive Craniectomy in Diffuse Traumatic Brain Injury. N Engl J Med 2011;364:1493-502
  9. Timofeev I, Santarius T, Kolias AG, Hutchinson PJA. Decompressive craniectomy - operative technique and perioperative care. Adv Tech Stand Neurosurg 2012;38:115-36, 10. Elsawaf A, Galhom A. Decompressive Craniotomy for Malignant Middle Cerebral Artery Infarction: Optimal Timing and Literature Review. World Neurosurgery 2018;116:71-8
  10. Tagliaferri F, Zani G, Iaccarino C, et al. Decompressive craniectomies, facts and fiction: a retrospective analysis of 526 cases. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2012;154:919-26
  11. Chen X, Hao Q, Yang SZ, et al. Improvement in Midline Shift Is a Positive Prognostic Predictor for Malignant Middle Cerebral Artery Infarction Patients Undergoing Decompressive Craniectomy. Front Neurol 2021;12:652827
  12. Nirula R, Millar D, Greene T, et al. Decompressive craniectomy or medical management for refractory intracranial hypertension: An AAST-MIT propensity score analysis. J Trauma Acute Care Surger 2014;76:944-55
  13. Wang R, Li M, Gao WW, Guo Y, Chen J, Tian HL. Outcomes of Early Decompressive Craniectomy Versus Conventional Medical Management After Severe Traumatic Brain Injury: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Medicine (Baltimore) 2015;94:1733
  14. Posti JP, L