Dergiler / Haseki Tıp Bülteni / 2022 / Cilt: 60 - Sayı: 2

Comparison of Perioperative Outcomes and Urethral Complications Between Using 24-French and 26-French Resectoscope Sheaths in Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate

Sayfa
127–132
Yayın Tarihi
2022-10-17
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

The use of the 24F RS significantly reduces surgical and morcellation efficiency.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Aim: Although the 26F resectoscope is frequently used in transurethral prostatectomy, there are some concerns with high-caliber shafts.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:We compared 24F and 26F resectoscope used for Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate (HoLEP) in terms of effects on postoperative urethral complications and perioperative outcomes.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:The use of the 24F RS significantly reduces surgical and morcellation efficiency.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:2017 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

Aim: Although the 26F resectoscope is frequently used in transurethral prostatectomy, there are some concerns with high-caliber shafts. We compared 24F and 26F resectoscope used for Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate (HoLEP) in terms of effects on postoperative urethral complications and perioperative outcomes. Methods: Data from patients undergoing HoLEP from 2017 to 2021 was retrospectively analyzed. All surgeries were completed by a single surgeon. The patients were divided into one of two groups according to the resectoscope diameter (24F or 26F). All patients were followed up for urethral complications for 12 months. Perioperative outcomes and urethral complications were compared between the groups. Results: The study included 301 patients. The mean age of patients was 68.5±8.3 and 69.1±8.6 for the 26F group (n=180) and the 24F group (n=121), respectively (p=0.608). A total of seven in the 26F group (3.8%) and 3 patients in the 24F group (2.4%) had postoperative urethral stricture (US) (p=0.503). Besides, 2 patients (26F) and 1 patient (24F) had postoperative bladder neck contracture (BNC) (p=0.807). The operation efficiency was 1.25 g/min in the 26F group and 1.17 g/min in the 24F group (p=0.005). Conclusion: The use of 24F or 26F RS was not shown to cause statistically significant differences in the incidence of US and BNC during the 12-month follow-up. The use of the 24F RS significantly reduces surgical and morcellation efficiency.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

Yildiz, A., Anıl, H., Guzel, A., Akdemi, S., Arslan, M. (2022). Comparison of Perioperative Outcomes and Urethral Complications Between Using 24-French and 26-French Resectoscope Sheaths in Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate. Haseki Tıp Bülteni, Cilt: 60 - Sayı: 2, 127–132. https://ajindex.com/articles/534969

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (14)

  1. Kaya E, Gazel E, Yalcın S, et al. The effect of prostatic tissue density on the perioperative outcomes of Holmium laser enucleation of prostate (HoLEP): a pilot study. World J Urol 2020;38:455-61
  2. Yuk HD, Oh SJ. Perioperative Safety and Efficacy of Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate in Patients Receiving Antithrombotic Therapy: A Prospective Cohort Study. Sci Rep 2020;10:5308
  3. Yilmaz M, Esser J, Suarez-Ibarrola R, Gratzke C, Miernik A. Safety and Efficacy of Laser Enucleation of the Prostate in Elderly Patients - A Narrative Review. Clin Interv Aging 2022;17:15-33
  4. Yıldız A, Akdemir S, Anıl H, Arslan M. Safety and Efficacy of High-Powered Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate within 1-3 Weeks Following Prostate Biopsy. Urol Int 2021;105:852-7
  5. Michaud C, Codas-Duarte R, Matillon X, Crouzet S, Badet L, Fassi-Fehri H. One-year Functional Outcomes after Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate (HoLEP): Introduction of a Composite Score (Hexafecta). Prog Urol 2022;32:189-97
  6. Chen ML, Correa AF, Santucci RA. Urethral Strictures and Stenoses Caused by Prostate Therapy. Rev Urol 2016;18:90- 102
  7. Nielsen KK, Nordling J. Urethral stricture following transurethral prostatectomy. Urology 1990;35:18-24
  8. Günes M, Keles MO, Kaya C, et al. Does resectoscope size play a role in formation of urethral stricture following transurethral prostate resection?. Int Braz J Urol 2015;41:744-9
  9. Charlson ME, Pompei P, Ales KL, MacKenzie CR. A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chronic Dis 1987;40:373-83
  10. Quan H, Li B, Couris CM, et al. Updating and validating the Charlson comorbidity index and score for risk adjustment in hospital discharge abstracts using data from 6 countries. Am J Epidemiol 2011;173:676-82
  11. Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 2004;240:205- 13
  12. Mamoulakis C, Efthimiou I, Kazoulis S, Christoulakis I, Sofras F. The modified Clavien classification system: a standardized platform for reporting complications in transurethral resection of the prostate. World J Urol 2011;29:205-10
  13. Ibrahim A, Alharbi M, Elhilali MM, Aubé M, Carrier S. 18 Years of Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate: A Single Center Experience. J Urol 2019;202:795-800
  14. Michielsen DP, Coomans D. Urethral strictures and bipolar transurethral re