Dergiler / Hand and Microsurgery / 2018 / Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 1

A study of the radiographic morphometry of the distal radius in a south Indian population

Sayfa
9–15
Yayın Tarihi
2022-10-19
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

In this study, weattempt to publish our results of our study of the radiological parameters in the South Indian population.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Background: Distal radius fractures are arguably the most common orthopedic injuries encountered by the treating orthopedicsurgeon.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Only radiographsof the distal radius with fused physis were considered in this study.Results: The mean value of the radial height was 0.88cm with a standard deviation of 0.26cm.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:In this study, weattempt to publish our results of our study of the radiological parameters in the South Indian population.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

Background: Distal radius fractures are arguably the most common orthopedic injuries encountered by the treating orthopedicsurgeon. Correction of dorsal tilt and radial height is important to restore the normal biomechanics of the wrist joint.The aim of this study is to report the morphometry of the distal radius in a South Indian population and give a comparisonto similar studies of other races and populations.Methods: Three hundred and ten consecutive plain radiographs of the wrist joint were included in all the radiographs.Four radiological parameters were studied in all the radiographs namely radial height, radial inclination, ulnar variance andpalmar tilt. Radiographs that were not centered on the wrist joint or rotated were excluded from the study. Only radiographsof the distal radius with fused physis were considered in this study.Results: The mean value of the radial height was 0.88cm with a standard deviation of 0.26cm. The mean radial height formales was 0.92 ± 0.27cm and in females was 0.81± 0.23cm (p=0, which is significant). The mean radial inclination was21.58 ± 3.35o. The palmar tilt averaged 11.36 ± 3.16o. The ulnar variance was neutral in 110 males (56.4%) and 66 females(57.4%).Conclusion: The morphometry of the distal radius varies with race, ethnicity, and build of the patient. Thorough knowledgeof the morphometry of the distal radius of the local population becomes critical for the treating surgeon. In this study, weattempt to publish our results of our study of the radiological parameters in the South Indian population.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

NEKKANTI, S., SHAH, J., MUDUNDI, D., SAKHUJA, V., SHANKAR, V., CHANDRU, V. (2022). A study of the radiographic morphometry of the distal radius in a south Indian population. Hand and Microsurgery, Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 1, 9–15. https://ajindex.com/articles/533954

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (1)

  1. Vardhan H, Kumari R, Chouhan SK. Anatomy of distal end of radius: A radiological study done on adult population of Jharkhand state of India. International Journal of Medical and Health Research 2017;3:119-20 2.Chan CYW, Vivek AS, Leong WH, Rukmanikanthan S. Distal radius morphometry in the malaysian population. Malays Orthop J 2008;2:27–30. 3.Short WH, Palmer AK, Werner FW, Murphy DJ. A biomechanical study of distal radial fractures. J Hand Surg Am 1987;12:529–34. 4.De Smet L. Ulnar variance: facts and fiction review article. Acta Orthop Belg 1994;60:1–9. 5.Palmer AK, Werner FW. Biomechanics of the distal radioulnar joint. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1984;187:26–35. 6.Casagrande DJ, Morris RP, Carayannopoulos NL, Buford WL. Relationship between ulnar variance, cortical bone density, and load to failure in the distal radius at the typical site of fracture initiation. J Hand Surg Am 2016;41:461–8. 7.Jupiter JB, Masem M. Reconstruction of post-traumatic deformity of the distal radius and ulna. Hand Clin 1988;4:377–90. 8.Gartland JJ, Werley CW. Evaluation of healed Colles’ fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1951;33A:895–907. 9.Hadi SA, Wijiono W. Distal radius morphometry of Indonesian population. Med J Indones 2013;23:173. 10.Gelberman RH, Salamon PB, Jurist JM, Posch JL. Ulnar variance in Kienböck’s disease. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1975;57:674–6. 11.Mishra PK, Nagar M, Gaur SC, Gupta A. Morphometry of distal end radius in the Indian population: A radiological study. Indian J Orthop 2016;50:610–5. 12.Altissimi M, Antenucci R, Fiacca C, Mancini GB. Long-term results of conservative treatment of fractures of the distal radius. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1986;206:202–10. 13.Beumer A, Lindau TR. Grip strength ratio: a grip strength measurement that correlates well with DASH score in different hand/wrist conditions. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2014;15:336. 14.Porter M, Stockley I. Fractures of the distal radius. Intermediate and end results in relation to radiologic parameters. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1987;220:241–52. 15.Taleisnik J, Watson HK. Midcarpal instability caused by malunited fractures of the distal radius. J Hand Surg Am 1984;9:350–7.