Dergiler / Hand and Microsurgery / 2018 / Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 1

Hand grip strength Age and gender stratified normative data in Anatolian population

Sayfa
16–23
Yayın Tarihi
2022-10-19
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

The dominant hand is on average 8% stronger than the non-dominant hand in bothgenders and all age groups.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Objective: The purpose of this study is twofold; first we aimed to provide age and gender specific normative hand gripstrength (HGS) data in Anatolian adult population and secondly we aimed to determine the effects of gender and handdominance on HGS.Patients and Methods: The study included 1359 adult healthy subjects, aged 18-90 years.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:A calibrated hydraulic handdynamometer was used for the HGS measurements in accordance with current standardized instructions.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:The dominant hand is on average 8% stronger than the non-dominant hand in bothgenders and all age groups.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

Objective: The purpose of this study is twofold; first we aimed to provide age and gender specific normative hand gripstrength (HGS) data in Anatolian adult population and secondly we aimed to determine the effects of gender and handdominance on HGS.Patients and Methods: The study included 1359 adult healthy subjects, aged 18-90 years. A calibrated hydraulic handdynamometer was used for the HGS measurements in accordance with current standardized instructions. The HGSs onsides, age, gender, and dexterity were recorded and statistically analyzed.Results: The subjects were 712 males and 647 females with a mean age of 41.8±15.9 years and 46.9±16.1 years, respectively. Left hand dominance was determined in 67 subjects. Male subjects were stronger than female subjects in eachage stratified group (p: 0.001). HGS showed a significant decline as the age of the subjects increased (r=-0.463, p=0.0001dominant hand, r=-0.472, p=0.0001 non-dominant hand). The dominant hand was stronger than the non-dominant hand(p=0.0001). The mean difference between the dominant and non-dominant hand was 8.5% (SD: 13.1, median 7.6%). Themean strength ratio between the dominant and non-dominant hand was 1.07±0.12 for males and 1.09±0.13 for females.Conclusions: This study is the largest study to present normative values of HGS in an Anatolian population. These findings can be used as a reference for future studies in an Anatolian population. HGS was seen to be higher in males andto decrease proportionally with age. The dominant hand is on average 8% stronger than the non-dominant hand in bothgenders and all age groups.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

ACAR, B., ARIK, H. O., YÜKSEL, H. Y., ÜNAL, M., GÜLER, F., KÖSE, Ö. (2022). Hand grip strength Age and gender stratified normative data in Anatolian population. Hand and Microsurgery, Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 1, 16–23. https://ajindex.com/articles/533935

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (20)

  1. Mathiowetz M. Comparison of Rolyan and Jamar dynamometers for measuring grip strength. Occ Ther Int 2002
  2. Koley S, Pal Kaur S. Correlations of Handgrip Strength with Selected Hand-Arm-Anthropometric Variables in Indian Inter-university Female Volleyball Players. Asian J Sports Med 2011
  3. Mathiowetz V, Kashman N, Volland G, Weber K, Dowe M, Rogers S. Grip and pinch strength: normative data for adults. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1985
  4. Petersen P, Petrick M, Connor H, Conklin D. Grip strength and hand dominance: challenging the 10% rule. Am J Occup Ther 1989
  5. Armstrong CA, Oldham JA. A comparison of dominant and nondominant hand strengths. J Hand Surg 1999
  6. 24B:421-5. 6.Bechtol CO. Grip test
  7. The use of a dynamometer with adjustable handle spacings. J Bone Joint Surg 1954
  8. Incel NA, Ceceli E, Durukan PB, Erdem HR, Yorgancioglu ZR. Grip strength: effect of hand dominance. Singapore Med J 2002
  9. Desrosiers J, Bravo G, Hebert R, Dutil E. Normative data for grip strength of elderly men and women. Am J Occup Ther 1995
  10. 637–44. 9.Desrosiers J, Bravo G, Hébert R, Mercier L. Impact of elbow position on grip strength of elderly men. J Hand Ther 1995
  11. Harth A, Vetter WR. Grip and pinch strength among selected adult occupational groups. OccupTher Int 1994
  12. 13–28. 11.Kamon E, Goldfuss AJ. In-plant evaluation of the muscle strength of workers. Am Ind Hyg Assoc J 1978
  13. Balogun JA, Adenlola SA, Akinloye AA. Grip strength normative data for the Harpenden dynamometer. J Orthop Sport Phys Ther 1991
  14. 155–60. 13.Backman E, Johansson V, Hager B, Sjoblom P, Henriksson KG. Isometric muscle strength and muscular endurance in normal persons aged between 17 and 70 years. Scand J Rehab Med 1995
  15. 109–17. 14.Nevill AM, Holder RL. Modelling handgrip strength in the presence of confounding variables: results from the Allied Dunbar National Fitness Survey. Ergonomics 2000
  16. 1547–58. 15.Peolsson A, Hedlund R, Oberg B. Intra- and inter-tester reliability and reference values for hand strength. J Rehab Med 2001
  17. 36–41. 16.Sella GE. The hand grip: gender, dominance and age considerations. Eur Med Phys 2001
  18. 161–70. 17.Bao S, Silverstein B. Estimation of hand force in ergonomic job evaluations. Ergonomics 2005
  19. Luna-Heredia E, Martín-Peña G, Ruiz-Galiana J. Handgrip dynamometry in healthy adults. Clin Nutr 2005
  20. Tsang RCC. Reference values for 6-minute walk test and hand-grip