Dergiler / Hand and Microsurgery / 2018 / Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 3

The rise of wide awake hand surgery - Contribution from Turkey

Sayfa
125–134
Yayın Tarihi
2022-10-19
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Increased patient comfort without a tourniquet, cost-effectivity, no preoperative tests, no risks of general anesthesia, no needto stay in the hospital overnight, and intraoperative active motion assessment facility are important advantages.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Objectives: Recently, many surgeons started to prefer wide awake local anesthesia no tourniquet (WALANT) approachto provide an almost bloodless field for the vast majority of hand surgery procedures.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:We aimed to present our two-yearexperience with WALANT technique.Methods: A wide variety of 682 hand surgery operations in 626 patients were performed with WALANT technique.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Increased patient comfort without a tourniquet, cost-effectivity, no preoperative tests, no risks of general anesthesia, no needto stay in the hospital overnight, and intraoperative active motion assessment facility are important advantages.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

Objectives: Recently, many surgeons started to prefer wide awake local anesthesia no tourniquet (WALANT) approachto provide an almost bloodless field for the vast majority of hand surgery procedures. We aimed to present our two-yearexperience with WALANT technique.Methods: A wide variety of 682 hand surgery operations in 626 patients were performed with WALANT technique. Forinfiltrative local anesthesia, the mixture of 1% lidocaine, 1:100.000 epinephrine and 8.4% bicarbonate was prepared. Theneed for intraoperative sedation and intraoperative patient cooperation were evaluated. Patients' fingers were observed incase of postoperative circulatory compromise. A simple cost-effectivity analysis for the anesthesia types was performed.Results: Mean age of the patients was 43.7. None of the patients needed intraoperative sedation, and patients obeyed toorders of surgeon throughout the procedure. The postoperative circulatory compromise was observed in two fingers; onefinger resolved spontaneously and the other rescued with phentolamine. WALANT technique was more cost-effective thanBier block or general anesthesia.Conclusion: The WALANT technique seems like a great innovation to perform a wide variety of hand surgery cases. Increased patient comfort without a tourniquet, cost-effectivity, no preoperative tests, no risks of general anesthesia, no needto stay in the hospital overnight, and intraoperative active motion assessment facility are important advantages.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

ÖZDEMİR, E., AYHAN, E., ÇEVİK, K., GÜMÜŞOĞLU, E., ESKANDARİ, M. M. (2022). The rise of wide awake hand surgery - Contribution from Turkey. Hand and Microsurgery, Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 3, 125–134. https://ajindex.com/articles/533933

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (16)

  1. Green DP. General principles. In: Wolfe SW, Hotchkiss RN, Pederson WC, Kozin SH, (eds.) Green’s Operative Hand Surgery. Elsevier Churchill Livingstone, Philadelphia, 2011:3-24
  2. Bunnell S. Surgery of the Hand. Philadelphia, JB Lippincott; 1944
  3. Lalonde D, Eaton C, Amadio P, Jupiter J. Wideawake Hand and Wrist Surgery: A New Horizon in Outpatient Surgery. Instr Course Lect 2015;64:249-59
  4. Lalonde D, Bell M, Benoit P, Sparkes G, Denkler K, Chang P. A multicenter prospective study of 3,110 consecutive cases of elective epinephrine use in the fingers and hand: the Dalhousie Project clinical phase. J Hand Surg Am 2005;30:1061-7
  5. Bruce AM, Spencer JM. Surgical myths in dermatology. Dermatol Surg 2010;36:512-7
  6. Chowdhry S, Seidenstricker L, Cooney DS, Hazani R, Wilhelmi BJ. Do not use epinephrine in digital blocks: myth or truth? Part II. A retrospective review of 1111 cases. Plast Reconstr Surg 2010;126:2031-4
  7. Krunic AL, Wang LC, Soltani K, Weitzul S, Taylor RS. Digital Anesthesia with Epinephrine: An Old Myth Revisited. J Am Acad Dermatol 2004;51: 755-9
  8. Denkler K. A comprehensive review of epineph rine in the finger: to do or not to do. Plast Reconstr Surg 2001;108:114-24
  9. Thomson CJ, Lalonde DH, Denkler KA, Feicht AJ. A critical look at the evidence for and against elective epinephrine use in the finger. Plast Reconstr Surg 2007;119:260-6
  10. Fitzcharles-Bowe C, Denkler K, Lalonde D. Finger injection with high-dose (1:1,000) epinephrine: Does it cause finger necrosis and should it be treated? Hand (NY) 2007;2:5-11
  11. Nodwell T, Lalonde D. How long does it take phentolamine to reverse adrenaline-induced vasoconstriction in the finger and hand? A prospective, randomized, blinded study: The Dalhousie project experimental phase. Can J Plast Surg 2003;11: 187-90
  12. Zhu AF, Hood BR, Morris MS, Ozer K. Delayed-Onset Digital Ischemia After Local Anesthetic With Epinephrine Injection Requiring Phentolamine Reversal. J Hand Surg Am 2017;42:479. e1-479.e4
  13. Burkhart KK. The reversal of the ischemic effects of epinephrine on a finger with local injections of phentolamine. J Emerg Med 1992;10:496
  14. Ravindran V, Rajendran S. Digital gangrene in a patient with primary Raynaud's phenomenon. J R Coll Physicians Edinb 2012;42:24-6
  15. Ruiter T, Harter T, Miladore N, Neafus A, Kasdan M. Finger amputation after injection with lidocaine and epinephrine. Eplasty 2014;14:ic43
  16. Hutting K, van Rappard JR, Prins A, Knepper AB, Mouës-Vink C. D