Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar
AI InsightBoth of flaps can be applied safely, quickly and easily for reconstruction of soft tissue defects resulting frommalleolar fractures.
📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale
Abstract
Objectives: Soft tissue defects of the ankle malleolar region may develop after a traumatic injury or the surgery required torepair this trauma. The aim of this study is to evaluate the results of the flaps used to repair soft tissue defects after medialand lateral malleolar fractures of the ankle.Methods and Materials: Patients who were treated with flaps due to soft tissue defect after surgical treatment of malleolarfractures between 2010-2018 were evaluated retrospectively. Of the patients included in the study, six (24%) were femaleand 19 (76%) were male. The mean age was 50.4 years (range of 5-83 years). All patients had a soft tissue defect with anexposed tendon, joint, bone, or implant either isolated or in combination. At the last follow-up, the patients were evaluatedfor the viability of the flap, complications, and patient satisfaction.Results: Seventeen (68%) of the patients had a reverse-sural fasciocutaneous flap (RSFF), 7 (28%) had rotational flaps,and 1 (4%) had a propeller flap. The size of the flaps ranged from 6 x 9 cm to 2 x 2 cm (mean 4.3 ± 1.7 x 3.9 ± 1.3). Themean follow-up period was 22 months (range of 6-35 months). The mean time of flap application after the trauma was 40days (range of 10-150 days). Marginal skin necrosis developed in two patients with rotational flaps. Partial necrosis dueto venous congestion developed in four patients with RSFF. These patients were treated successfully with skin grafting inaddition to debridement. There was no complete flap loss.Conclusion: Rotational and RSFF can be applied effectively without the need for microsurgery, anticoagulant therapy, ormonitoring. Both of flaps can be applied safely, quickly and easily for reconstruction of soft tissue defects resulting frommalleolar fractures.