Dergiler / Hand and Microsurgery / 2019 / Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 2

Interpolation flaps and determination of pedicle separation time

Sayfa
102–108
Yayın Tarihi
2022-10-19
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

No patient received physical therapy in the postoperative period.Conclusion: Some experimental studies in addition to clinical trials and our study all show that unnecessary prolonging ofthe separation time of interpolation flaps can be avoided.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Objectives: Interpolation flaps are applied with their pedicle to import donor tissue from non-adjacent sites to the defectarea.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Following surgery, it is considered to be beneficial for the patient’s comfort to decreasethe duration of hospitalization.Methods: We performed the interpolation flap procedures as a method for repairing various tissue defects in 79 cases bothretrospectively and prospectively.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:No patient received physical therapy in the postoperative period.Conclusion: Some experimental studies in addition to clinical trials and our study all show that unnecessary prolonging ofthe separation time of interpolation flaps can be avoided.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

Objectives: Interpolation flaps are applied with their pedicle to import donor tissue from non-adjacent sites to the defectarea. These flaps require two-stage surgeries, the second of which is indispensable. The interval between both proceduresmust be kept as short as possible. Following surgery, it is considered to be beneficial for the patient’s comfort to decreasethe duration of hospitalization.Methods: We performed the interpolation flap procedures as a method for repairing various tissue defects in 79 cases bothretrospectively and prospectively. Twelve of the cases were forehead flaps, 4 of them were Tagliacozzi flaps, 23 cases wereabdominal flaps, 9 cases were cross-finger flaps, 1 case was a reverse cross-finger flap, 5 cases were Abbe flaps, 4 caseswere tongue flaps, 7 cases were groin, and 14 cases were sural flaps. We checked the perfusion of the clamped flaps intraoperativelywith indocyanine green.Results: We managed to separate the flap pedicle after a minimum of 6 days and a maximum of 14 days. Before separation,all flaps were clamped intraoperatively and if the flaps showed perfusion with indocyanine green, flap separation wasperformed. The sural flaps were separated after a minimum of 21 and a maximum of 24 days. In no case did flap necrosisoccur after separation. No patient received physical therapy in the postoperative period.Conclusion: Some experimental studies in addition to clinical trials and our study all show that unnecessary prolonging ofthe separation time of interpolation flaps can be avoided.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

YENİDUNYA, M. O., IRMAK, F. (2022). Interpolation flaps and determination of pedicle separation time. Hand and Microsurgery, Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 2, 102–108. https://ajindex.com/articles/533916

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (18)

  1. Mellette JR, Ho DQ. Interpolation flaps. Dermatol Clin 2005
  2. Camphell WC, Canale ST, Beaty JH. Campbell’s operative orthopaedics. Mosby/Elsevier, Philadelphia, 2008
  3. Serafin D. Atlas of microsurgical composite tissue transplantation. W.B. Saunders, Philedelphia, 1996
  4. Jones AP, Janis JE. Essentials of Plastic Surgery. CRC Press Taylor&Francis Group, Boca Raton, 2016
  5. Kanuri A, Liu AS, Guo L. Whom should we SPY? A cost analysis of laser-assisted indocyanine green angiography in prevention of mastectomy skin flap necrosis during prosthesis-based breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2014
  6. 448–44e-54e. 6.Yenidünya MO, Yenidünya S. Initially alloperfused autograft: an experimental study with rat groin free flap. Plast Reconstr Surg 2000
  7. Jones NF, Kuzon WM Jr, Shestak KC, Roth AG. Use of fluorescein to predict survival of a free jejunal transfer after disruption of the arterial pedicle on postoperative day 12. Br J Plast Surg 1994
  8. Menick FJ. Grabb&Smith’s Plastic Surgery. Charles Thorne (ed.) Lippincott Williams&Wilkins, Philedelphia, 2010
  9. Tsur H, Daniller A, Strauch B. Neovascularization of skin flaps: Route and timing. Plast Reconstr Surg 1980
  10. Serafin D, Shearin C, Georgiade NG. The vascularization of free flaps: A clinical and experimental correlation. Plast Reconstr Surg 1977
  11. Young CM. The revascularization of pedicle skin flaps in pigs: A functional and morphologic study. Plast Reconstr Surg 1982
  12. Khouri RK, Brown DM, Leal-Khouri SM, Tark KC, Shaw WW. The effect of basic Fibroblast Growth Factor on the neovascularization process: skin flap survival and staged flap transfers. Br J Plast Surg 1991
  13. Douglas B, Buchholz RR. The blood circulation in pedicle flaps: An accurate test for determining its efficiency. Ann Surg 1943
  14. Gatti JE, LaRossa D, Brousseau DA, Silverman DG. Assessment of neovascularization and timing of flap division. Plast Reconstr Surg 1984
  15. Klingenstrom P. Timing of transfer of tubed pedicles and cross flaps. Plast Reconstr Surg 1966
  16. Nakajima T. How soon do venous drainage channels develop at the periphery of a free flap? A study in rats. Br J Plast Surg 1978
  17. Williams G, Butler P, Niranjan N. Flap Vascularity After Free Musculocutaneous Tissue Transfer. Plast Reconstr Surg 1998
  18. Zhang F, Waller W, Lineaweaver WC. Growth factors and flap survival.