KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Hand and Microsurgery / 2019 / Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 1

Subcutaneous and submuscular transposition due to ulnar nerve entrapment at the elbow– Analyses of 43 primary and 44 revision cases

Gert ANDERSSON
Malin ZİMMERMAN
Lars B. DAHLİN
Ilka ANKER
Helene JACOBSSON
Sayfa
9–18
Yayın Tarihi
2022-10-19
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Forty-three of the former were transpositions(15 SCT and 28 SMT) and 44 (7 SCT and 37 SMT) of the latter, which were the ones included in the present study.Medical records, including electrophysiological protocols, were reviewed and the postoperative outcome was graded as 1)cured/improved, and 2) unchanged/exacerbated symptoms, based on the patient-reported and surgeon-evaluated outcome.Results: The frequency of concomitant systemic diseases (p

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Objectives: Knowledge is scarce about the outcome of revision surgery for recurrent or persistent ulnar nerve entrapmentat the elbow (UNE).
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:We studied the outcome of subcutaneous (SCT) and submuscular (SMT) ulnar nerve transpositionsdue to UNE, analyzing both primary and revision surgeries, aiming to identify predictors for revision surgery.Methods: All surgically treated UNE cases (2004-2008) at our department were studied retrospectively.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Forty-three of the former were transpositions(15 SCT and 28 SMT) and 44 (7 SCT and 37 SMT) of the latter, which were the ones included in the present study.Medical records, including electrophysiological protocols, were reviewed and the postoperative outcome was graded as 1)cured/improved, and 2) unchanged/exacerbated symptoms, based on the patient-reported and surgeon-evaluated outcome.Results: The frequency of concomitant systemic diseases (p
🔬Tür:Literatür & Derleme Çalışması
📍Kapsam:2004-2008 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

Objectives: Knowledge is scarce about the outcome of revision surgery for recurrent or persistent ulnar nerve entrapmentat the elbow (UNE). We studied the outcome of subcutaneous (SCT) and submuscular (SMT) ulnar nerve transpositionsdue to UNE, analyzing both primary and revision surgeries, aiming to identify predictors for revision surgery.Methods: All surgically treated UNE cases (2004-2008) at our department were studied retrospectively. The initial populationof surgically treated patients included 285 primary and 52 revision surgeries. Forty-three of the former were transpositions(15 SCT and 28 SMT) and 44 (7 SCT and 37 SMT) of the latter, which were the ones included in the present study.Medical records, including electrophysiological protocols, were reviewed and the postoperative outcome was graded as 1)cured/improved, and 2) unchanged/exacerbated symptoms, based on the patient-reported and surgeon-evaluated outcome.Results: The frequency of concomitant systemic diseases (p

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

ANDERSSON, G., ZİMMERMAN, M., DAHLİN, L. B., ANKER, I., JACOBSSON, H. (2022). Subcutaneous and submuscular transposition due to ulnar nerve entrapment at the elbow– Analyses of 43 primary and 44 revision cases. Hand and Microsurgery, Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 1, 9–18. https://ajindex.com/articles/533903

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (14)

  1. Latinovic R, Gulliford MC, Hughes RA. Incidence of common compressive neuropathies in primary care. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2006;77:263-5
  2. Descatha A, Leclerc A, Chastang JF, Roquelaure Y. Study Group on Repetitive Work. Incidence of ulnar nerve entrapment at the elbow in repetitive work. Scand J Work Environ Health 2004;30:234-40
  3. Mondelli M, Giannini F, Ballerini M, Ginanneschi F, Martorelli E. Incidence of ulnar neuropathy at the elbow in the province of Siena (Italy). J Neurol Sci 2005;234:5-10
  4. Omejec G, Podnar S. What causes ulnar neuropathy at the elbow? Clin Neurophysiol 2016;127:919-24
  5. Bartels RH, Verbeek AL. Risk factors for ulnar nerve compression at the elbow: a case control study. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2007;149:669-74; discussion 74
  6. Kakosy T. Tunnel syndromes of the upper extremities in workers using hand-operated vibrating tools. Med Lav 1994;85:474-80
  7. Beekman R, Schreuder AH, Rozeman CA, Koehler PJ, Uitdehaag BM. The diagnostic value of provocative clinical tests in ulnar neuropathy at the elbow is marginal. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2009;80:1369-74
  8. Todnem K, Michler RP, Wader TE, Engstrom M, Sand T. The impact of extended electrodiagnostic studies in ulnar neuropathy at the elbow. BMC Neurol 2009;9:52
  9. Anker I, Zimmerman M, Andersson GS, Jacobsson H, Dahlin LB. Outcome and predictors in simple decompression of ulnar nerve entrapment at the elbow. Hand Microsurg 2018;7:24-32
  10. Osterman AL, Davis CA. Subcutaneous transposition of the ulnar nerve for treatment of cubital tunnel syndrome. Hand Clin 1996;12:421-33
  11. Liu CH, Wu SQ, Ke XB, Wang HL, Chen CX, Lai ZL, et al. Subcutaneous Versus Submuscular Anterior Transposition of the Ulnar Nerve for Cubital Tunnel Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials and Observational Studies. Medicine (Baltimore) 2015;94:e1207
  12. Biggs M, Curtis JA. Randomized, prospective study comparing ulnar neurolysis in situ with submuscular transposition. Neurosurgery 2006;58:296-304; discussion 296-304
  13. Gervasio O, Gambardella G, Zaccone C, Branca D. Simple decompression versus anterior submuscular transposition of the ulnar nerve in severe cubital tunnel syndrome: a prospective randomized study. Neurosurgery 2005;56:108-17; discussion 17
  14. Macadam SA, Gandhi R, Bezuhly M, Lefaivre KA. Simple decompression versus anterior subcutaneous and submuscular transposition of the ulnar nerve for cubital tunnel syndrome: a meta-analysis