Dergiler / Hand and Microsurgery / 2020 / Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 3

Extension block pinning in subacute/late bony mallet finger injuries

Sayfa
146–152
Yayın Tarihi
2022-10-19
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Although it has more limited results in chronic cases, it can be used safely in the majority of cases requiring surgery.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Objective: Mallet finger is inability to fully extend a finger due to the disruption of the extensor mechanism integrity at the distal interphalangeal (DIP) joint level.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Cases with DIP joint subluxation, and avulsion fractures involving more than 30% of the DIP joint surface are candidates for surgery.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Although it has more limited results in chronic cases, it can be used safely in the majority of cases requiring surgery.
🔬Tür:Literatür & Derleme Çalışması
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

Objective: Mallet finger is inability to fully extend a finger due to the disruption of the extensor mechanism integrity at the distal interphalangeal (DIP) joint level. Cases with DIP joint subluxation, and avulsion fractures involving more than 30% of the DIP joint surface are candidates for surgery. Subacute/late cases have poor outcomes. Investigating the success of extension block pinning in subacute/late bony mallet finger cases is aimed. Methods: Patient demographics, the rate of DIP joint involvement in plain X-rays, subluxation status of DIP joint, the time between injury and operation, the duration of the operation, complications in post-operative follow-up, extensor lag and healing status of bone were reviewed. Patient outcomes and relation with operative delay and joint subluxation were analyzed. Results: Mean rate of DIP joint involvement of study group was 43.4 ± 6.12%. Half of the study group (n=7) had DIP joint subluxation. Mean time from injury to operation was 29.78±20.4 days. Six patients’ time from injury to operation was longer than 5 weeks. Study group had statistically significant improvement after surgery. Preoperative mean extensor lag was 15.71° ± 7.30° and postoperative mean extensor lag was 5.57° ± 8.89°(p5 weeks) and presence of subluxation did not alter the outcome (p=0.353 and p=0.149, respectively). Conclusion: Extension block pinning technique is a fast, easy-to-apply technique with minimal morbidity. Although it has more limited results in chronic cases, it can be used safely in the majority of cases requiring surgery.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

Arslan, R., Kara, M., Ustun, G. G., Gursoy, K., Kocer, U. (2022). Extension block pinning in subacute/late bony mallet finger injuries. Hand and Microsurgery, Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 3, 146–152. https://ajindex.com/articles/533883

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (13)

  1. Abouna JM, Brown H. The treatment of mallet finger. The results in a series of 148 consecutive cases and a review of the literature. Br J Surg 1968;55:653-67.
  2. Handoll HH, Vaghela MV. Interventions for treating mallet finger injuries. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2004:CD004574. Bendre AA, Hartigan BJ, Kalainov DM. Mallet finger. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2005;13:336-44.
  3. Clayton RA, Court-Brown CM. The epidemiology of musculoskeletal tendinous and ligamentous injuries. Injury 2008;39:1338-44. Robb WA. The results of treatment of mallet finger. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1959;41-B:546-9.
  4. Stark HH, Boyes JH, Wilson JN. Mallet finger. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1962;44-A:1061-8.
  5. Stern PJ, Kastrup JJ. Complications and prognosis of treatment of mallet finger. J Hand Surg Am 1988;13:329-34.
  6. Bloom JM, Khouri JS, Hammert WC. Current concepts in the evaluation and treatment of mallet finger injury. Plast Reconstr Surg 2013;132:560e-566e. Burke F. Mallet finger. J Hand Surg Br 1988;13:115-7. Stack HG. A modified splint for mallet finger. J Hand Surg Br 1986;11:263. Crawford GP. The molded polythene splint for mallet finger deformities. J Hand Surg Am 1984;9:231-7.
  7. Wehbe MA, Schneider LH. Mallet fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1984;66:658-69.
  8. O'Brien LJ, Bailey MJ. Single blind, prospective, randomized controlled trial comparing dorsal aluminum and custom thermoplastic splints to stack splint for acute mallet finger. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2011;92:191-8.
  9. Tocco S, Boccolari P, Landi A, Leonelli C, Mercanti C, Pogliacomi F, et al. Effectiveness of cast immobilization in comparison to the gold-standard self-removal orthotic intervention for closed mallet fingers: a randomized clinical trial. J Hand Ther 2013;26:191-200; quiz 201. Valdes K, Naughton N, Algar L. Conservative treatment of mallet finger: A systematic review. J Hand Ther 2015;28:237-45; quiz 246. Lamaris GA, Matthew MK. The Diagnosis and Management of Mallet Finger Injuries. Hand (N Y) 2017;12:223-8.
  10. Kaleli T, Ozturk C, Ersozlu S. External fixation for surgical treatment of a mallet finger. J Hand Surg Br 2003;28:228-30.
  11. Toker S, Turkmen F, Pekince O, Korucu I, Karalezli N. Extension Block Pinning Versus Hook Plate Fixation for Treatment of Mallet Fractures. J Hand Surg Am 2015;40:1591-6.
  12. Kronlage SC, Faust D. Open reduction and screw fixation of mallet fractures. J Hand Surg Br 2004;29:135-8.
  13. Shimura H, Wakabayashi Y, Nimura A. A novel closed reduction with extension block and flexion block using Kirschner wires and microscrew