Dergiler / Hacettepe Üniversitesi Edebiyat Fakültesi Dergisi / 2009 / Cilt: 26 - Sayı: 1

A Prussian architect in Ottoman Service: August Carl Friedrich Jasmund

Sayfa
235–252
Yayın Tarihi
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Based on these data, this study aims to better interpret the biography of Jasmund and his activities in the Ottoman Empire and in Germany in relation to his individualistic architectural style.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:This essay evaluates the activities of Prussian architect August Carl Friedrich Jasmund in the Ottoman Empire.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Following his graduation, Jasmund briefly visited Istanbul and surrounding cities to examine oriental architecture in 1888-1889.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Based on these data, this study aims to better interpret the biography of Jasmund and his activities in the Ottoman Empire and in Germany in relation to his individualistic architectural style.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

This essay evaluates the activities of Prussian architect August Carl Friedrich Jasmund in the Ottoman Empire. He studied architecture at the Royal Academy of Architecture in Berlin. Following his graduation, Jasmund briefly visited Istanbul and surrounding cities to examine oriental architecture in 1888-1889. Sultan Abdülhamid II invited Jasmund to work in the service of during this stay. He was then appointed as the private architect of the sultan, as well as technical advisor for the Ottoman State and teacher for the School of Fine Arts in Istanbul. Besides these official tasks, he also designed special buildings for the state and private organizations. He left behind numerous buildings during his stay of 20 years in Istanbul. In his initial designs, for example Sirkeci Railway Station, he had a contradictory style and saw Turkish architecture as a piece of orientalism. He preferred neo-classism and neo-renaissance of Europe in the official buildings and an architectural understanding, the synthesis of Europe- Ottoman, in civil buildings. Some of his designs show the influences of the buildings that he had taken part in their construction in Germany. This situation was the result of his arrival to Istanbul at a very young age and undertaking some important tasks before he had enough experience. This study is mainly based on the information derived from the documents found in both Ottoman and German archives. Based on these data, this study aims to better interpret the biography of Jasmund and his activities in the Ottoman Empire and in Germany in relation to his individualistic architectural style.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

YAVUZ, M. (2022). A Prussian architect in Ottoman Service: August Carl Friedrich Jasmund. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Edebiyat Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 26 - Sayı: 1, 235–252. https://ajindex.com/articles/531363

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (17)

  1. Akbulut, M. R. (1994).
  2. Moltke, Helmuth von. Dünden Bugüne İstanbul Ansiklopedisi, 5, 486-487.
  3. Anonym, Verzeichnis der im Preußischen Staate und bei Behörden des Deutschen Reiches angestellten BAUBEAMTEN, Zusammengestellt vom Ministerium der Öffentlichen Arbeiten, Ausgabe 1913, Berlin 1913. Verlag von Wilhelm Ernst & Sohn. Barillari, D. ve Godoli, E. (1997). İstanbul 1900,
  4. İstanbul.
  5. Batur, A. (1994).
  6. A. Jasmund, DBIA., C. 4. İstanbul, ss. 317-318.
  7. Berger, M. (1984). Bad Oeynhausen. Kurstädte in Deutschland, Zur Geschichte einer Baugattung, (Hrsg: Rolf Bothe), Berlin. Bothe, R. (1984). Kurstädte in Deutschland, Zur Geschichte einer Baugattung, Berlin. Can, C. (1993) İstanbul’da 19.yy.da Batılı ve Levanten mimarların yapıları ve koruma sorunları, (unpublizierte Dissertatiob), Yıldız Teknik Üniversitesi,
  8. Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, İstanbul.
  9. Demiriz, Y. (1992). Caddebostan’da Mabeyinci Ragıp Paşa’nın kızı için yaptırdığı köşk hakkında bazı notlar. Semavi Eyice armağanı, Istanbul Yazıları, Istanbul, ss. 363-380.
  10. Ekdal, M. (2004). Kapalı hayat kutusu-Kadıköy konakları, İstanbul, 252-254.
  11. Hildebrandt, D. (1991). Unter den Linden: Photographien, Berlin. Kokkelink, G. (2003). Planungs- und Baugeschichte des “Königlichen Polizei-Praesidiums”. Hannover-Heute: Polizei Direktion, Von der Polizei der Obrigkeit zum Dienstleister für öffentliche Sicherheit, Hannover, 15- 20. Köster, B. (1985). Bad Oeynhausen. Ein Architekturmuseum des 19. Jahrhunderts, München. Nasır, A. (1991). Türk mimarlığında yabancı mimarlar üzerine bir deneme, (unpublizierte Dissertation), İstanbul Teknik Üniversitesi,
  12. FBE, Istanbul. Schwantes, B. (1997). Die Kaiserlich- Deutsche Botschaft in Istanbul, Frankfurt am Main. Simon, P. ve Behrens, M. (1988). Badekur und Kurbad. Bauten in deutschen Bädern 1780-1920,
  13. München. Sözen, M ve Tapan, M. (1973). 50 yılın türk mimarisi. İstanbul.
  14. Tekeli, İ. ve İlkin, S. (1997). Mimar Kemalettin’in yazdıkları, Ankara.
  15. Yavuz, M. (2001). 19. yüzyıl sonu 20. yüzyıl başlarında İstanbul’da Alman mimarların yaptıkları mimari eserler. (unpublizierte Magisterarbeit) Atatürk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Erzurum. Yavuz, M. (2002). Osmanlı’da Alman Mimarlar ve Eserleri. Türkler, C. 15, Ankara, 400-411.
  16. Yavuz, M. (Nisan 2004). Mimar August Jasmund-hakkında bilmediklerimiz. Ege Üniversitesi Edebiyat Fakültesi Sanat Tarihi Dergisi, Aydoğan Demir’e Armağan, 13-14, 181-205.
  17. Yavuz, M. (2006). Eine vergleichende Studie über den Bahnbau und die Bahnhofsarchitektur der anatoli