Dergiler / Hand and Microsurgery / 2021 / Cilt: 10 - Sayı: 2

Evaluating the contribution of CT evaluation for wrist tenderness after trauma with orthopedic surgeon perspective

Sayfa
134–142
Yayın Tarihi
2022-10-19
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Since its contribution to the diagnosis and treatment plan is limited, evaluation with CT should be limited as much as possible.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Objectives: In recent years, great advances have been made in the treatment of distal radius fractures.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Methods: Patients who were evaluated with x-ray and CT after tenderness in the distal radius between February 2005 and December 2019 were included in the study.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Since its contribution to the diagnosis and treatment plan is limited, evaluation with CT should be limited as much as possible.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:2005 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

Objectives: In recent years, great advances have been made in the treatment of distal radius fractures. More treatment options have revealed the necessity to reveal the fracture pattern clearly before surgery. Therefore, many CT-based studies have been conducted examining articular extension and fracture pattern. All of these studies included cases with distal radius fractures. Evaluating the contribution of CT to guide diagnosis and treatment in suspected distal radius fracture has not studied in detail. We retrospectively examined patients who were evaluated in the emergency service and outpatient clinic after trauma and underwent CT for sensitivity in the distal radius. We aimed to evaluate whether the CT examination contributes to the diagnosis and treatment selection. Methods: Patients who were evaluated with x-ray and CT after tenderness in the distal radius between February 2005 and December 2019 were included in the study. Radiological examinations of the patients were evaluated by two different evaluators. After the evaluation, interpersonal and intrapersonal validity of diagnostic modalities were analysed. Results: It was observed that intra-observer and inter-observer reliability was acceptable in the evaluation by direct radiography and CT technique. (p 0.001). Conclusion: When evaluated in terms of fracture classification and treatment selection, a significant diagnosis-surgical decision change cannot occur with the CT technique in this patient group. Since its contribution to the diagnosis and treatment plan is limited, evaluation with CT should be limited as much as possible.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

Ozturk, T., Eren, M. B. (2022). Evaluating the contribution of CT evaluation for wrist tenderness after trauma with orthopedic surgeon perspective. Hand and Microsurgery, Cilt: 10 - Sayı: 2, 134–142. https://ajindex.com/articles/531306

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (13)

  1. Chung KC, Spilson SV. The frequency and epidemiology of hand and forearm fractures in the United States. J Hand Surg Am 2001;26:908-15. Fernandez D. Fractures of the distal radius; operative treatment. Instr Course Lect 1993;42:73-88. Melone Jr C. Articular fractures of the distal radius. Orthop Clin North Am 1984;15:217-36.
  2. Jupiter JB, Fernandez DL. Comparative classification for fractures of the distal end of the radius. J Hand Surg Am 1997;22:563-71.
  3. Harness NG, Ring D, Zurakowski D, Harris GJ, Jupiter JB. The influence of three-dimensional computed tomography reconstructions on the characterization and treatment of distal radial fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2006;88:1315-23.
  4. Benson LS, Minihane KP, Stern LD, Eller E, Seshadri R. The outcome of intra-articular distal radius fractures treated with fragment-specific fixation. J Hand Surg Am 2006;31:1333-9.
  5. Dodds SD, Cornelissen S, Jossan S, Wolfe SW. A biomechanical comparison of fragment-specific fixation and augmented external fixation for inYeartra-articular distal radius fractures. J Hand Surg Am 2002;27:953-64.
  6. Schumer ED, Leslie BM. Fragment-specific fixation of distal radius fractures using the Trimed device. Tech Hand Up Extrem Surg 2005;9:74-83.
  7. Khanchandani P, Badia A. Functional outcome of arthroscopic assisted fixation of distal radius fractures. Indian J Orthop 2013;47:288-94.
  8. Wolfe SW, Easterling KJ, Yoo HH. Arthroscopic-assisted reduction of distal radius fractures. Arthroscopy 1995;11:706-14.
  9. Levy HJ, Glickel SZ. Arthroscopic assisted internal fixation of volar intraarticular wrist fractures Arthroscopy 1993;9:122-4.
  10. Tanabe K, Nakajima T, Sogo E, Denno K, Horiki M, Nakagawa R. Intra-articular fractures of the distal radius evaluated by computed tomography. J Hand Surg Am 2011;36:1798-803.
  11. Rozental TD, Bozentka DJ, Katz MA, Steinberg DR, Beredjiklian PK. Evaluation of the sigmoid notch with computed tomography following intra-articular distal radius fracture. J Hand Surg Am 2001;26:244-51. Flinkkilä T, Nikkola-Sihto A, Kaarela O, Päakkö E, Raatikainen T. Poor interobserver reliability of AO classification of fractures of the distal radius: additional computed tomography is of minor value. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1998;80:670-2.
  12. Arealis G, Galanopoulos I, Nikolaou VS, Lacon A, Ashwood N, Kitsis C. Does the CT improve inter-and intra-observer agreement for the AO, Fernandez and Universal classification systems for distal radius fractures? Injury 2014;45:1579-84.
  13. Dahlen H, Franck W, Sabauri G, A