Dergiler / Hand and Microsurgery / 2021 / Cilt: 10 - Sayı: 2

Challenging difficulties of flap reconstruction in the hand

Sayfa
116–126
Yayın Tarihi
2022-10-19
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

All these are challenging difficulties in choosing flap for defects in the hand.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Objectives: In reconstructive hand surgery, flaps and therefore microsurgical techniques are inevitable to provide the best functional and aesthetic results.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Methods: Patients who underwent microvascular flap surgery for upper extremity tissue defects between 2014-2018 were included in the study.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:All these are challenging difficulties in choosing flap for defects in the hand.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:2014-2018 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

Objectives: In reconstructive hand surgery, flaps and therefore microsurgical techniques are inevitable to provide the best functional and aesthetic results. There are various complications of defect repair with microsurgical methods. We aimed to classify subacute and late unexpected complications that develop after defect repair by microsurgical methods and to present the management. Methods: Patients who underwent microvascular flap surgery for upper extremity tissue defects between 2014-2018 were included in the study. Complications other than total flap loss were retrospectively investigated and recorded. Results: Eight patients (Six males, two females) were included to the study. Five left and three right hand defects were detected. Three fingers, three hand dorsum, one wrist and one forearm defects were detected. Two marginal necrosis, two partial flap loss, one venous insufficiency, one nonunion, one skin contracture and one burn were the determined complications. Conclusion: Most defects present with different traumas in hand. The trauma zone is almost always close to the area of microvascular repair, moreover the recipient artery may not always be intact. How the bone fixation is performed is very important, covering the bone should be provided with well-blooded tissues. While providing all these, this coverage should not be bulky and should not restrict the range of motion in the hand. Having grasping function necessitates a repair that puts the function in the foreground compared to other areas in the body. Subclinical infections of hand in patients presenting with post-traumatic defects may cause nutritional problems, which may impair wound healing. Such a problem can also be confused with the arterial deprivation of the flap. The absolute sense requirement distinguishes the hand area from the reconstruction of many areas. All these are challenging difficulties in choosing flap for defects in the hand.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

Tosun, Z., Sutcu, M., Akdag, O., Yildiran, G., Erkol, E. E. (2022). Challenging difficulties of flap reconstruction in the hand. Hand and Microsurgery, Cilt: 10 - Sayı: 2, 116–126. https://ajindex.com/articles/531244

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (7)

  1. Karjalainen T, Sebastin SJ, Chee KG, Peng YP, Chong AKS. Flap Related Complications Requiring Secondary Surgery in a Series of 851 Local Flaps Used for Fingertip Reconstruction. J Hand Surg Asian Pac Vol 2019;24:24-9. Sammer DM. Management of complications with flap procedures and replantation. Hand Clin 2015;31:339-44.
  2. Chang CS, Chu MW, Nelson JA, Basta M, Gerety P, Kanchwala SK, et al. Complications and Cost Analysis of Intraoperative Arterial Complications in Head and Neck Free Flap Reconstruction. J Reconstr Microsurg 2017;33:318-27.
  3. Kucur C, Durmus K, Uysal IO, Old M, Agrawal A, Arshad H, et al. Management of complications and compromised free flaps following major head and neck surgery. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2016;273:209-13.
  4. Koul AR, Patil RK, Nahar S. Unfavourable results in free tissue transfer. Indian J Plast Surg 2013;46:247-55.
  5. Novakovic D, Patel RS, Goldstein DP, Gullane PJ. Salvage of failed free flaps used in head and neck reconstruction. Head Neck Oncol 2009;1:33. Iamaguchi RB, Takemura RL, Silva GB, de Oliveira Alves JA, Torres LR, Cho AB, et al. Peri-operative risk factors for complications of free flaps in traumatic wounds - a cross-sectional study. Int Orthop. 2018;42:1149-56.
  6. Herlin C, Bertheuil N, Bekara F, Boissiere F, Sinna R, Chaput B. Leech therapy in flap salvage: Systematic review and practical recommendations. Ann Chir Plast Esthet 2017;62:e1-e13. Rendenbach C, Steffen C, Hanken H, Schluermann K, Henningsen A, Beck-Broichsitter B, et al. Complication rates and clinical outcomes of osseous free flaps: a retrospective comparison of CAD/CAM versus conventional fixation in 128 patients. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2019;48:1156-62. Grishkevich VM. Flexion contractures of fingers: contracture elimination with trapeze-flap plasty. Burns 2011;37:126-33.
  7. Reece EM, Bonelli MA, Livingston T, Mulligan PS, Rockwood J, Wilson JR, et al. Factors in Free Fasciocutaneous Flap Complications: A Logistic Regression Analysis. Plast Reconstr Surg 2015;136:54e-58e.