KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Hacettepe Journal of Mathematics and Statistics / 2014 / Cilt: 43 - Sayı: 1

TYPE I ERROR RATE FOR TWO-SAMPLE TESTS IN STATISTICAL SHAPE ANALYSIS

Gokhan OCAKOGLU
Ilker ERCAN
Sayfa
141–152
Yayın Tarihi
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗

Özet

-

Abstract

Nowadays, with the help of advanced imaging techniques the image orshape of an organ or organism can be used as input data. Therefore,the statistical analysis of shape has recently become more importantin the medical and biological sciences. Methods related to two-sampletests have been developed for statistical shape analysis, giving rise toconsiderable interest in research that evaluates the performance of thesetests. In this study, two sample procedures are used to compare themean shapes from the statistical shape analysis literature according totype I error rate.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

OCAKOGLU, G., ERCAN, I. (2022). TYPE I ERROR RATE FOR TWO-SAMPLE TESTS IN STATISTICAL SHAPE ANALYSIS. Hacettepe Journal of Mathematics and Statistics, Cilt: 43 - Sayı: 1, 141–152. https://ajindex.com/articles/530390

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (15)

  1. Ercan, I., Ocakoglu, G., Sigirli, D. and Ozkaya, G. Statistical shape analysis and usage in medical sciences, Turkiye Klinikleri J Biostat. 4(1), 27-35 (2012).
  2. Amaral, G.J.A, Dryden, I. and Wood, A.T.A. Pivotal bootstrap methods for k-sample problems in directional statistics and shape analysis, Journal of the American Statistical Association. 102(478), 695-707 (2007).
  3. Dryden, I.L. and Mardia, K.V. Statistical shape analysis (Vol. 4). Wiley, New York, 1998.
  4. Rohlf, F.J. Shape statistics. Procrustes superimpositions and tangent spaces, Journal of Classification. 16(2), 197-223, 1999.
  5. Rohlf, F.J. On the use of shape spaces to compare morphometric methods, Hystrix-the Italian Journal of Mammalogy, 11(1), 12-13, 2000.
  6. Brombin, C. and Salmaso, L. Multi-aspect permutation tests in shape analysis with small sample size, Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, 53(12), 3921-3931, 2009.
  7. Bookstein, F. L. Morphometric tools for landmark data: Geometry and Biology. Cambridge Univ. Press, New York, 1991.
  8. Claude, J. Morphometrics with R. Springer Verlag, 2008.
  9. Zelditch, M., Swiderski, D.L., Sheets, H.D. and Fink, W.L. Geometric morphometrics for biologists. A primer. Academic Press, 2004. Hammer, Ø. and Harper, D.A.T. Paleontological data analysis. Malden (Massachusetts), Blackwell Publishing Ltd Oxford, 2005.
  10. Richtsmeier, J.T., Lele, S. and Cole, T. Landmark morphometrics and the analysis of variation, In. Hallgrimsson, B, Hall, BK(eds.)Variation. A Central Concept in Biology. Amsterdam. Elsevier, 2005.
  11. Lele, S. and Richtsmeier, J.T. An invariant approach to statistical analysis of shapes, Florida. Chapman & Hall, 2001.
  12. Goodall, C. Procrustes methods in the statistical analysis of shape, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B (Methodological), 53(2), 285-339, 1991.
  13. Ercan, I., Etoz, A., Guney, I., Ocakoglu, G., Ozdemir, S.T., Kan, I. and Kahveci, R. Statistical shape analysis of nose in Turkish young adults, Journal of Craniofacial Surgery, 18(1), 219, 2007.
  14. Dryden, I. L. Shapes package. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria, 20 Ercan, I., Ocakoglu, G., Guney, I. and Yazici, B. Adaptation of generalizability theory for inter-rater reliability for landmark localization, International Journal of Tomography & Statistics, 9(S08), 51-58, 2008.
  15. Ercan, I., Ozdemir, S.T, Etoz, A., Sigirli, D., Tubbs, R.S., Loukas, M. and Guney, I. Facial asymmetry in young healthy subjects evaluated by statistical shape analysis, Journal of Anatomy, 213(6), 663-669