Dergiler / Hacettepe Journal of Biology and Chemistry / 2009 / Cilt: 37 - Sayı: 4

Microporous poly(hydroxyethyl methacrylate) based affinity membranes carrying heparin for cholesterol apheresis

Sayfa
271–280
Yayın Tarihi
2022-10-17
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

LMWH attached PHEMAAL membranes adsorbed cholesterol in the range of 12.7-22.6 mg/g from hypercholesterolemic human plasma.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:In this study, the preparation of polymeric membranes using bioaffinity technology for application in blood filtration devices is described.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:In order to further increase blood-compatibility of affinity membranes, aminoacid based comonomer N-methacryloyl-L-alanine (MAAL) was included in the polymerization recipe.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:LMWH attached PHEMAAL membranes adsorbed cholesterol in the range of 12.7-22.6 mg/g from hypercholesterolemic human plasma.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

In this study, the preparation of polymeric membranes using bioaffinity technology for application in blood filtration devices is described. Low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) attached poly(hydroxyethyl methacrylate) (PHEMA) based microporous affinity membranes were used for selective removal of cholesterol from hypercholesterolemic human plasma in-vitro. In order to further increase blood-compatibility of affinity membranes, aminoacid based comonomer N-methacryloyl-L-alanine (MAAL) was included in the polymerization recipe. PHEMAAL membranes were produced by a photopolymerization technique and then characterized by swelling test and scanning electron microscope (SEM) studies. In vitro blood-compatibility tests were assessed using modified activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT), prothrombin time (PT) and coagulation time (CT). The water swelling ratio of PHEMAAL increased significantly (133.2%) compared with PHEMA (58%). PHEMAAL membranes have large pores around in the range of 5-10 μm. All the clotting times increased when compared with PHEMA membranes. Loss of platelets and leukocytes was very low. LMWH loading amount was in the range of 87.5-147.2 mg/g. There was a very low non-specific cholesterol adsorption onto the PHEMA membranes, about 0.69 mg/g. LMWH attached PHEMAAL membranes adsorbed cholesterol in the range of 12.7-22.6 mg/g from hypercholesterolemic human plasma.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

KARAKOÇ, V., ÇELİK, H., DENİZLİ, A., YAVUZ, H., UZUN, L. (2022). Microporous poly(hydroxyethyl methacrylate) based affinity membranes carrying heparin for cholesterol apheresis. Hacettepe Journal of Biology and Chemistry, Cilt: 37 - Sayı: 4, 271–280. https://ajindex.com/articles/529319

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (31)

  1. M. Blaha, Acta Med., 46 (2003) 3
  2. H. Mabuchi, Atherosclerosis, 61 (1986) 1
  3. H. Mabuchi, J. Japan Atherosclerosis Soc. 16 (1988) 299
  4. J.L. Goldstein and K.S.E. Dank, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., 72 (1975) 1092
  5. N. Koga and Y. Iwata, Atherosclerosis, 90 (1991) 168
  6. M. Eriksson, B. Lantz, L. Berlund, B. Angelin, Acta Med Scand, 221 (1987) 317
  7. G.R. Thompson, Lancet, 1 (1987)1246
  8. W. Wang, H. Xie, L. Sun, L. Qu, L. Wang, Y. Yu, D. Kong, Bimed. Mater., 4 (2009) 1
  9. Y. Homma, Y. Mikami, H. Tamachi, Arteriosclerosis, 5 (1986) 613
  10. G.R. Thompson, Atherosclerosis, 167 (2003) 1
  11. P.J. Lupien, S. Moorjani, M. Lou, D. Brun, C. Gagne, Pediat. Res., 14 (1980) 113
  12. W. Toffel and T. Demant, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., 78 (1981) 611
  13. H. Borberg, W. Stoffel, K. Oett, Plasma Ther. Transfus. Technol., 4 (1983) 459
  14. E. Behm, T. Kuroda, N. Yamawaki, Biomat. Artif. Cells Artif. Organs, 15 (1987) 101
  15. K. Thies, S.A. Prigent, C.C. Heuck, Artif. Organs, 12 (1988) 320
  16. Y.M. Lopukhin, V.Y. Zuevsky, S.S. Markin, E.S. Nalivaiko, A.N. Rabovsky, Biomat. Artif. Cells and Artificial Organs,18 (1990) 571
  17. S.N. Pokrovsky, I.Y. Adamova, G.F. Benelovenskaya, Biomat. Artif. Cells and Artif. Organs, 18 (1990) 623-628
  18. A. Denizli and E. Pişkin, J. Chromatogr. B, 670 (1995) 157
  19. F.M. Plieva, B. Mattiasson, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res.,47(12) (2008) 4131
  20. M. Nachman, J. Chromatogr., 597 (1992) 167
  21. C. Charcosset, J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol., 71 (1998) 95
  22. J.B. Park, 1984, Biomaterials Science and Engineering, Plenum Press. New York (1984)
  23. B. Garipcan, N. Bereli, S. Patır, Y. Arıca, A. Denizli, Macromol. Biosci., 1 (2001) 332
  24. A.K. Bajpai, D.D. Misra, J. Appl. Polym. Sci., 102 (2006) 1341
  25. A. Denizli, J. Chromatogr. B, 772 (2002) 357
  26. H.S. Van Damme and J. Feijen in Modern Aspects of Protein Adsorption on Biomaterials, Y.F. Missirlis and W. Lemm eds., Kluwer Academic Publishers, The Netherlands, 1991
  27. A. Tabak, N. Lotan, S. Sideman, A. Tzipiniuk, B. Bleiberg and G. Brook, Life Support Systems, 4 (1986) 355
  28. R.E. Ostlund, Artif. Organs, 11 (1987) 366
  29. G. Smolik, B. Schmidt, U. Baurmeister, H.J. Gurland, Artif. Organs, 13 (1988) 368
  30. B. Schmidt, Ex-vivo evaluation of biocompatibility, Presentation at the Xth Int. Symp. on Hemoperfusion and Immobilized Reactants, Rome, Sept 24 (1990)
  31. V.V. Sinitsyn, L.M. Metlitscaya, A.G. Mamontova, G.A. Konovalov, V.V. Kukharchuk, Biomat. Artif. Cells. Artif. Organs, 18