Dergiler / Hand and Microsurgery / 2021 / Cilt: 10 - Sayı: 3

Carpal tunnel surgery 5-year follow-up results; Pitfalls in surgery and atypical carpal tunnel syndrome. Do we do it right?

Sayfa
260–268
Yayın Tarihi
2022-10-19
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Result: There were significant statistical differences in improvement between the preoperative and postoperative VAS and BCTQ scores of primary and revision cases (p

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Background: Although carpal tunnel release surgery (CTRS) is a routine surgery, it can cause catastrophic results with incorrect incisions, insufficient release, and frequent recurrences.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Patients and Methods: Between 2015 and 2020, we analyzed the results of 47 CTRS with 37 primary and ten revision surgeries in the database management system.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Result: There were significant statistical differences in improvement between the preoperative and postoperative VAS and BCTQ scores of primary and revision cases (p
🔬Tür:Uygulamalı Anket & Alan Araştırması
📍Kapsam:2015 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

Background: Although carpal tunnel release surgery (CTRS) is a routine surgery, it can cause catastrophic results with incorrect incisions, insufficient release, and frequent recurrences. In this study, we aimed to present the results of the pa- tients who underwent primary and revision CTRS and the pitfalls in surgery in the light of atypical cases. Patients and Methods: Between 2015 and 2020, we analyzed the results of 47 CTRS with 37 primary and ten revision surgeries in the database management system. The clinical and functional results of the patients were reported compara- tively using Electromyography (EMG), visual analog scale (VAS), Boston Carpal Tunnel Syndrome Questionnaire (BCTQ) values in the preoperative and postoperative sixth month. Result: There were significant statistical differences in improvement between the preoperative and postoperative VAS and BCTQ scores of primary and revision cases (p

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

Köse, A., Toy, S., Turgut, M. C., Engin, M. Ç. (2022). Carpal tunnel surgery 5-year follow-up results; Pitfalls in surgery and atypical carpal tunnel syndrome. Do we do it right?. Hand and Microsurgery, Cilt: 10 - Sayı: 3, 260–268. https://ajindex.com/articles/527725

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (17)

  1. Slater JR. Carpal tunnel syndrome: current con- cepts. J South Orthop Assoc 1999;8:203-13
  2. Calandruccio JH, Thompson NB. Carpal Tunnel Syndrome: Making Evidence-Based Treatment Decisions. Orthop Clin 2018;49:223-9
  3. Pfeffer G, Gelberman R, Boyes J, Rydevik B. The history of carpal tunnnel syndrome. J Hand Surg Br 1988;13:28-34
  4. Atroshi I, Gummesson C, Johnsson R, Ornstein E, Ranstam J, Rosen I. Prevalence of carpal tun - nel syndrome in a general population. JAMA 1999;282:153-8
  5. Tanaka S, Wild DK, Seligman PJ, Behrens V, Cam- eron L, Putz-Anderson V. The US prevalence of self-reported carpal tunnel syndrome: 1988 Na- tional Health Interview Survey data. Am J Public Health 1994;84:1846-8
  6. Stevens JC. AAEM minimonograph# 26: the elec- trodiagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome. Muscle Nerve 1997;20:1477-86
  7. Yılmaz A. [Diabetik polinöropati tetkiki için baş- vuran hastalarda sessiz karpal tünel sendromu gelişimi.][Article in Turkish] Master thesis. Trakya University; 2010
  8. Phalen GS. The Carpal-tunnel Syndrome: Clinical Evaluation of 598 Hands. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1972;83:29-40
  9. Posch J, Marcotte D. Carpal Tunnel Syndrome; An Analysis of 1,201 Cases. Orthop Rev 1976;5:25- 35
  10. Louis DS, Greene TL, Noellert RC. Compli- cations of carpal tunnel surgery. J Neurosurg 1985;62:352-6
  11. Crichton N. Visual analogue scale (VAS). J Clin Nurs 2001;10:697-706
  12. Levine DW, Simmons BP, Koris MJ, Daltroy LH, Hohl GG, Fossel AH, et al. A self-administered questionnaire for the assessment of severity of symptoms and functional status in carpal tunnel syndrome. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1993;75:1585-92
  13. Tetik C, Erol B. [Karpal tünel sendromunun cer- rahi tedavisinde uygulanan alternatif metodların karşılaştırılması.][Article in Turkish] Eklem Hast- alıkları ve Cerrahisi 2002;13:5-9
  14. Tubbs RS, Rogers JM, Loukas M, Cömert A, Sho- ja MM, Cohen-Gadol AA. Anatomy of the palmar branch of the ulnar nerve: application to ulnar and median nerve decompressive surgery. J Neurosurg 2011;114:263-7
  15. Akhtar S, Prat JA, Sinha S. Neuropraxia of the pal- mar cutaneous branch of the ulnar nerve during carpal tunnel decompression. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 2005;87:W1
  16. Ott F, Mattiassich G, Kaulfersch C, Ortmaier R. Initially unrecognised lunate dislocation as a cause of carpal tunnel syndrome. BMJ Case Rep 2013;2013:bcr2013009062
  17. Sadat-Ali M, Bluwi M. Unusual cause of car- pal tunnel syndrome: a case report. Hand Surg 2004;9:115-6.