Dergiler / Gülhane Tıp Dergisi / 2021 / Cilt: 63 - Sayı: 4

The effect of anesthetic techniques on postoperative outcomes of open prostatectomy in the era of enhanced recovery after surgery

Sayfa
287–291
Yayın Tarihi
2022-10-17
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Conclusions: This study showed that SA was superior to GA in maintaining hemodynamic stability, reducing blood loss, complications, postoperative analgesia requirement, and time to discharge, which are the main goals of ERAS protocols.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Aims: As the enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) concept gains popularity in the surgical practice, the anesthetic technique has a more important effect on the postoperative course, especially in aged population.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Methods: This retrospective study included patients between 40 and 90 years of age who underwent elective OP between 2014 and 2020.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Conclusions: This study showed that SA was superior to GA in maintaining hemodynamic stability, reducing blood loss, complications, postoperative analgesia requirement, and time to discharge, which are the main goals of ERAS protocols.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:2014 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

Aims: As the enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) concept gains popularity in the surgical practice, the anesthetic technique has a more important effect on the postoperative course, especially in aged population. The aim of this study was to compare general anesthesia (GA) with spinal anesthesia (SA) regarding the perioperative outcomes with respect to the ERAS protocols in open prostatectomy (OP) for benign prostate hyperplasia. Methods: This retrospective study included patients between 40 and 90 years of age who underwent elective OP between 2014 and 2020. Data were collected from hospital’s database, patient files, and anesthesia charts. The exclusion criteria were malignancy, lost to follow- up, and missing data. Primary outcome measures were perioperative variables. Secondary outcome measures were factors influencing hospital discharge time. Results: Of 105 patients (age, mean±SD: 68.3±5.7 years) included in the study, 61 patients were administered in GA (group GA) and 44 in SA (group SA). As the primary outcome measures, when compared with group SA, deliberate hypotensive anesthesia was required in more patients [26 (42.6%) vs. 15 (34.1%); p=0.027] and transfusion rate was higher (6.5% vs. 4.5%; p=0.044) in group GA. Mean visual analogue scale score (3.6±1.1 vs. 2.8±0.4; p=0.040) and opioid consumption (32.8±4.4 vs. 26.3±4.9 mg; p=0.088) were higher, and time to first rescue analgesic use was also shorter (1.1±0.9 vs. 4.7±1.3 hours; p=0.011) in group GA when compared with group SA. Conclusions: This study showed that SA was superior to GA in maintaining hemodynamic stability, reducing blood loss, complications, postoperative analgesia requirement, and time to discharge, which are the main goals of ERAS protocols.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

EŞKİN, M. B., ÖZHAN, M. Ö., ÇAPARLAR, C., SÜZER, M. A., KARA, U., KAMBUROĞLU, H. (2022). The effect of anesthetic techniques on postoperative outcomes of open prostatectomy in the era of enhanced recovery after surgery. Gülhane Tıp Dergisi, Cilt: 63 - Sayı: 4, 287–291. https://ajindex.com/articles/526773

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (14)

  1. Lim KB. Epidemiology of clinical benign prostatic hyperplasia. Asian J Urol. 2017;4:148-151
  2. Zargooshi J. Open prostatectomy for benign prostate hyperplasia: short-term outcome in 3000 consecutive patients. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2007;10:374-377
  3. Montesi L, Quaresima L, Tiroli M, et al. Improvement of lower urinary tract symptoms and sexual activity after open simple prostatectomy: prospective analysis of 50 cases. Arch Ital Urol Androl. 2014;86:353-355
  4. Milicevic S, Grubor P, Lucic N. The evaluation of impact of BPH surgical treatment with the open prostatectomy and transurethral resection of the prostate methods on the quality of life. Med Arh. 2011;65:274-277
  5. Cerantola Y, Valerio M, Persson B, et al. Guidelines for perioperative care after radical cystectomy for bladder cancer: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS(®)) society recommendations. Clin Nutr. 2013;32:879-887
  6. Rodrigues Pessoa R, Urkmez A, Kukreja N, Baack Kukreja J. Enhanced recovery after surgery review and urology applications in 2020. BJUI Compass. 2020;1:5-14
  7. Stubenrouch FE, Mus EMK, Lut JW, Hesselink EM, Ubbink DT. The current level of shared decision-making in anesthesiology: an exploratory study. BMC Anesthesiol. 2017;17:95
  8. Hwang SM, Lee JJ, Jang JS, Gim GH, Kim MC, Lim SY. Patient preference and satisfaction with their involvement in the selection of an anesthetic method for surgery. J Korean Med Sci. 2014;29:287-291
  9. Salonia A, Crescenti A, Suardi N, et al. General versus spinal anesthesia in patients undergoing radical retropubic prostatectomy: results of a prospective, randomized study. Urology. 2004;64:95-100
  10. Kofler O, Prueckner S, Weninger E, et al. Anesthesia for Open Radical Retropubic Prostatectomy: A Comparison between Combined Spinal Epidural Anesthesia and Combined General Epidural Anesthesia. Prostate Cancer. 2019;2019:4921620
  11. Capdevila X, Aveline C, Delaunay L, et al. Factors Determining the Choice of Spinal Versus General Anesthesia in Patients Undergoing Ambulatory Surgery: Results of a Multicenter Observational Study. Adv Ther. 2020;37:527-540
  12. Adıyeke E, Adıyeke L. Factors affecting general or regional anesthesia preference in patients with elective surgery. Medical Science and Discovery. 2020;7:570-574
  13. Rhee WJ, Chung CJ, Lim YH, Lee KH, Lee SC. Factors in patient dissatisfaction and refusal regarding spinal anesthesia. Korean J Anesthesiol. 2010;59:260-264
  14. Salam AA, Afshan G. Patient refusal for regional