Dergiler / Maden Tetkik ve Arama Dergisi / 2015 / Cilt: 151 - Sayı: 151

GEOLOGICAL HERITAGE AND FRAMEWORK LIST OF THE GEOSITES IN TURKEY

Sayfa
259–268
Yayın Tarihi
2015-12-19
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

The Stratigraphic and Volcanic-Metamorphic-Sedimentary Petrology categories are the richest for the Frameworks; however they two already contain the majority of the geosites in the JEMIRKO inventory, which contains a total of 815 geosites.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Geosites and the special type of geosite called geological heritage are tangible materials such as rocks, fossils, minerals, sedimentary sequences, or structures about which there are results and/or documents of significant events in the geological history.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:The Framework List for Turkey proposed by this study includes 85 titles (frame) in 10 categories.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:The Stratigraphic and Volcanic-Metamorphic-Sedimentary Petrology categories are the richest for the Frameworks; however they two already contain the majority of the geosites in the JEMIRKO inventory, which contains a total of 815 geosites.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Framework List · Geological Heritage · Geoconservation

Abstract

Geosites and the special type of geosite called geological heritage are tangible materials such as rocks, fossils, minerals, sedimentary sequences, or structures about which there are results and/or documents of significant events in the geological history. A Framework List deciphers the geological events of the past without mentioning the localities or results. Ideally, there is only one Framework List for every country. The Framework List for Turkey proposed by this study includes 85 titles (frame) in 10 categories. The Stratigraphic and Volcanic-Metamorphic-Sedimentary Petrology categories are the richest for the Frameworks; however they two already contain the majority of the geosites in the JEMIRKO inventory, which contains a total of 815 geosites.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

KAZANCI, N., ŞAROĞLU, F., SULUDERE, Y. (2015). GEOLOGICAL HERITAGE AND FRAMEWORK LIST OF THE GEOSITES IN TURKEY. Maden Tetkik ve Arama Dergisi, Cilt: 151 - Sayı: 151, 259–268. https://ajindex.com/articles/52647

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (11)

  1. Arpat, E. 1976. İnsan ayağı iz fosilleri; yitirilen bir doğal anıt. Yeryuvarı ve İnsan 1/4, 65-66.
  2. Arpat, E., Güner, Y. 1976. Ağrı buz mağarası; ender bir do- ğal anıt. Yeryuvarı ve İnsan 1/1, 95-96.
  3. Barettino D., Vallejo M., Gallego E. (Eds).1999a. Towards the Balanced Management and Conservation of the Geological Heritage in the New Millenium. Pro- GEO - European Association for Conversation of Geological Heritage and Sociedad Geologica de Espana, Madrid, 459 s. Barettino D., Wimbledon W.A.P., Gallego E. (Eds). 1999b. Geological Heritage: Its Conservation and Mana- gement. ProGEO European Association for the Conservation of the Geological Heritage and So- ciedad Geologica de Espana, Madrid, 212 s. Brilha J., Andrade C., Azerêdo A., Barriga F.J.A.S., Cachão M., Couto H., Cunha P.P., Crispim J.A., Dantas P., Duarte L.V., Freitas M.C., Granja M.H., Henriques M.H., Henriques P., Lopes L., Madeira J., Matos J.M.X., Noronha F., Pais J., Piçarra J., Ramalho M.M., Relvas J.M.R.S., Ribeiro A., Santos A., Santos V., Terrinha P. 2005. Definition of the Portuguese frameworks with international relevance as an input for the European geological heritage characterisation. Episodes, 28(3), pp. 177-186.
  4. Burek, C.V., Prosser, C.D. 2008. The History of Geoconservation. Geological Society, Spec. Pub. 300, London, 312 s. De Lima, F.F., Brilha, J.B., Salamuni, E. 2010. Inventorying Geological Heritage in large territories: a methodological proposal applied to Brazil. Geoheritage 2, 91-99.
  5. Doughty, P. 2008. How things began: the origin of geological conservation. İç: The History of Geoconservation (Ed. Burek ve Prosser), Geol. Soc. Spec. Pub. 300, London, s. 7-16.
  6. Dowling, R., Newsome, D. (eds). 2005.
  7. Geotourism. Elsevier Pub., Amsterdam. Erikstad, L. 2008. History of geoconservation in Europe. İç: The History of Geoconservation (Ed. C.V. Burek ve C.D. Prosser), Geol. Soc. Spec. Pub. 300, London, s. 249-256.
  8. Kazancı, N. 2010. Jeolojik Koruma; Kavram ve Terimler. Jeolojik Mirası Koruma Derneği yayını, Ankara, 60 s. Kazancı, N., Şaroğlu, F. 2009. Türkiye Jeositleri Çatı Liste- si. 62. Türkiye Jeoloji Kurultayı (13-17 Nisan 2009)
  9. Bildiri Özleri Kitabı-I, Jeoloji Mühendisleri Odası, Ankara, s. 266-267.
  10. Kazancı, N., Şaroğlu, F., Kırman, E., Uysal, F. 2005, Ba- sic threats on geosites and geoheritages in Turkey. Proceedings of Second Conference on Geoheritage of Serbia, June 2004 Belgrade, pp. 149-153,
  11. Belgrade, Serbia-Montenegro. Kazancı, N., Şaroğlu, F., Doğan, A., Mülazımoğlu, N.