KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Glokom Katarakt / 2021 / Cilt: 16 - Sayı: 1

Effects of Static Cyclotorsion Compensation of Refractive Outcomes and Level of Vision in Excimer Laser Surgery

Kemal OZULKEN
Mehmet Ozgur CUBUK
Erdem YUKSEL
Sayfa
37–41
Yayın Tarihi
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Refractive outcomes could be better in the oblique group

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Purpose: To evaluate the reliability and reproducibility of static cyclotorsion compensation (SCC) measurements made by software of WaveLight EX500 Excimer laser in patients undergoing Laser-Assisted in Situ Keratomileusis (LASIK) procedure.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Patients with astigmatism greater than or equal to 0.50 D that undergone LASIK surgery with SCC were included in the Group 1, without SCC were included in Group 2.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Refractive outcomes could be better in the oblique group
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the reliability and reproducibility of static cyclotorsion compensation (SCC) measurements made by software of WaveLight EX500 Excimer laser in patients undergoing Laser-Assisted in Situ Keratomileusis (LASIK) procedure. Materials and Methods: A retrospective study was designed to compare the refractive and visual outcomes of LASIK procedure with or without SCC. Patients with astigmatism greater than or equal to 0.50 D that undergone LASIK surgery with SCC were included in the Group 1, without SCC were included in Group 2. The astigmatism of eyes in group 1 was also classifi ed according to axis as with the rule (WTR), against the rule (ATR) and oblique. The preoperative and postoperative spherical error, astigmatic error, and axis of astigmatism were compared between different groups. Subgroup analysis of group 1 was performed between different types of astigmatism groups. Results: Three hundred ninety-eight eyes of 199 patients were included in Group 1 and 126 eyes of 63 patients were included in Group 2. Postoperative spherical error was -0.003±0.36 (-1.00 +1.50) in group 1 and +0.11± 0.65 (-0.75 +1.50) in group 2 (p=0.04), Postoperative astigmatic error was -0.40±0.22 (-1.25 +0.50) in group 1 and -0.85± 0.22 (-1.25 -0.50) in group 2, (p=0.001). The mean magnitude of SCC was -0.95°±4.1. Postoperative astigmatic error was signifi cantly higher in WTR than ATR and oblique group (p=0.044, p=0.039, respectively) Conclusion: The cyclotorsion is reasonably compensated with using software of WaveLight EX500 Excimer in conjunction with the Wavelight Topolyzer Vario. Refractive outcomes could be better in the oblique group

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

OZULKEN, K., CUBUK, M. O., YUKSEL, E. (2022). Effects of Static Cyclotorsion Compensation of Refractive Outcomes and Level of Vision in Excimer Laser Surgery. Glokom Katarakt, Cilt: 16 - Sayı: 1, 37–41. https://ajindex.com/articles/525755

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (10)

  1. Swami AU, Steinert RF, Osborne WE, et al. Rotational malposition during laser in situ keratomileusis. Am J Ophthalmol 2002; 133:561-2
  2. Chernyak DA. Cyclotorsional eye motion occurring between wavefront measurement and refractive surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg 2004; 30:633-8
  3. Smith Jr EM, Talamo JH. Cyclotorsion in the seated and supine patient. J Cataract Refract Surg 1995; 21:402-3 4. Smith Jr EM, Talamo JH, Assil KK,et al. Comparison of astigmatic axis in the seated and supine positions. J Refract Corneal Surg 1994; 10:615-20
  4. Ciccio AE, Durrie DS, Stahl JE, et al. Ocular cyclotorsion during customized laser ablation. J Refract Surg. 2005;21; 6:772-4
  5. Chen X, Stojanovic A, Stojanovic F, et al. Effect of limbal marking prior to laser ablation on the magnitude of cyclotorsional error. J Refract Surg. 2012;28; 5:358-62
  6. Shen EP, Chen WL, Hu FR. Manual limbal markings versus irisregistration software for correction of myopic astigmatism by laser in situ keratomileusis. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2010;36; 3:431-6
  7. Arba-Mosquera S, Merayo-Lloves J, de Ortueta D. Clinical effects of pure cyclotorsional errors during refractive surgery. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2008; 49:4828-36
  8. Aslanides IM, Toliou G, Padroni S, et al. The effect of static cyclotorsion compensation on refractive and visual outcomes using the Schwind Amaris laser platform for the correction of high astigmatism. Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2011;34;3:114-20
  9. Suzuki A, Maeda N, Watanabe H, et al. Using a reference point and videokeratography for intraoperative identifi cation of astigmatism axis. J Cataract Refract Surg 1997; 23:1491-5. rotational eye tracking during LASIK treatment of myopic astigmatism with the Zyoptix laser platform and Advanced Control Eye Tracker. J Refract Surg 2010; 26:17-27 12. Arba-Mosquera S, Arbelaez MC. Three-month clinical outcomes with static and dynamic cyclotorsion correction using the SCHWIND AMARIS. Cornea. 2011;30; 9:951-7
  10. Tomita M, Watabe M, Yukawa S, et al. Supplementary effect of static cyclotorsion compensation with dynamic cyclotorsion compensation on the refractive and visual outcomes of laser in situ keratomileusis for myopic astigmatism. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2013;39; 5:752-8.