KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Gaziosmanpaşa Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi / 2017 / Cilt: 34 - Sayı: 1

Effects of Row Spacing on Growth, Yield and Quality Parameters of Sweet Sorghum

Serap AKDEMİR
Theofanis GEMTOS
Chris CAVALARIS
Odisseas MERKOURIS
Christos KARAMOUTIS
Diomi MAMMA
Dimitrios KEKOS
Sayfa
229–237
Yayın Tarihi
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

The compositional analysis of the crop samples revealed significant effects of row spacing on water soluble matter, cellulose and hemi-cellulose content revealing a beneficial effect of narrow row spacing on the quality and consequently ethanol production.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:A two-year field experiment was conducted in Thessaly, Central Greece, in order to evaluate the effect of row spacing on several growth and yield parameters of sweet sorghum.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:In particular, two row spacings were tested: wide row spacing (WRS) at 0.75m and narrow row spacing (NRS) at 0.375m.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:The compositional analysis of the crop samples revealed significant effects of row spacing on water soluble matter, cellulose and hemi-cellulose content revealing a beneficial effect of narrow row spacing on the quality and consequently ethanol production.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

A two-year field experiment was conducted in Thessaly, Central Greece, in order to evaluate the effect of row spacing on several growth and yield parameters of sweet sorghum. In particular, two row spacings were tested: wide row spacing (WRS) at 0.75m and narrow row spacing (NRS) at 0.375m. During the growing period, crop growth in terms of plants' emergence, plants' height, panicle appearance, while stalk sugar content, dry biomass and total sugar yield were also evaluated. In addition, plant material was analysed to assess the potential effects of the treatments on stalk quality. The results showed that with the appropriate cultural practices, sweet sorghum can yield over 40 Mg ha-1 of dry matter and over 18 Mg ha-1 of total sugar yield under Greek conditions. Narrow row spacing resulted to higher plant population and productivity in terms of dry matter and total sugar yield (61% and 37% increase, respectively) in the first year, but without any statistical significant difference compared to the wide spacing in the second year. The compositional analysis of the crop samples revealed significant effects of row spacing on water soluble matter, cellulose and hemi-cellulose content revealing a beneficial effect of narrow row spacing on the quality and consequently ethanol production.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

AKDEMİR, S., GEMTOS, T., CAVALARIS, C., MERKOURIS, O., KARAMOUTIS, C., MAMMA, D., KEKOS, D. (2022). Effects of Row Spacing on Growth, Yield and Quality Parameters of Sweet Sorghum. Gaziosmanpaşa Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 34 - Sayı: 1, 229–237. https://ajindex.com/articles/520871

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (10)

  1. Alexopoulou, E., Kipriotis, E., Zafiris, Ch. and Christou, M. (1998). Adaptability and productivity of sweet sorghum in northern Greece. In Proceedings of the 10th European Conference on Biomass for Energy and Industry, Wurzburg, Germany, 8-11 June, p. 939-942.
  2. Amaducci, S., Amaducci, M.T., Benati, R., Venturi, G., (2000). Crop yield and quality parameters of four annual fibre crops (hemp, kenaf, maize and sorghum) in the North of Italy. Ind. Crops Prod. 11, 179-186.
  3. Amaducci, S., Monti, A. & Venturi, G. (2004). Nonstructural carbohydrates and fibre components in sweet and fibre sorghum as affected by low and normal input techniques. Industrial Crops and Products 20 (1):111-118.
  4. Anfinrud, R., Cihacek, L., Johnson, B. L., Ji, Y. and Berti, M. T. (2013). Sorghum and kenaf biomass yield and quality response to nitrogen fertilization in the Northern Great Plains of the USA. Industrial Crops and Products 50:159-165.
  5. Broadhead, D. M. and Freeman, K. C. (1980). Stalk and sugar yield of sweet sorghum as affected by spacing. Agronomy Journal 72 (3):523-524.
  6. Chynoweth, D. P., Turick, C. E., Owens, J. M., Jerger, D. E. and Peck, M. W. (1993). Biochemical methane potential of biomass and waste feedstock. Biomass and Bioenergy 5(1):95-111.
  7. Cifuentes, R., Bressani, R. and Rolz, C. (2014). The potential of sweet sorghum as a source of ethanol and protein. Energy for Sustainable Development 21(1):13-19. Ethredge,W. J., Ashley, D. A. and Woodruff, J. M. (1988). Row spacing and plant population effects on yield components of soybean. Agronomy Journal 81(6):947-951. Farré, I., Faci, J.M., 2006. Comparative response of maize (Zea mays L.) and sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L. Moench) to deficit irrigation in a Mediterranean environment. Agric. Water Manag. Gemtos T. A., Galanopoulou, St. and Kavalaris, Chr. (1997). Wheat establishment after cotton with minimal tillage. European Journal of Agronomy 8:137-147.
  8. Habyarimana, E., Bonardi, P., Laureti, D., Di Bari, V., Cosentino, S. and Lorenzoni, C. (2004). Multilocational evaluation of biomass sorghum hybrids under two stand densities and variable water supply in Italy. Industrial Crops and Products 20(1):3-9.
  9. Kaushik, M. K. and Shaktawat, M. S. (2005). Effect of row spacing, nitrogen and weed control on growth, yield and nutrient uptake of sorghum. Indian Journal of Agronomy 50(2):140-142.
  10. Keren R., Meiri, A. and Kalo, Y. (1983). Plant spacing effect on yield of cotton irrigated with saline waters. Plant and Soil 74 (3):461-465. Mahm