Dergiler / Frankofoni / 2010 / Cilt: 0 - Sayı: 22

YAZIN VE BİLİM YA DA BİLİMSEL METİNLERİ YENİDEN YAZMAK

LITERATURE AND SCIENCE OR REWRITING SCIENTIFIC TEXTS

Sayfa
177–195
Yayın Tarihi
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Considered in particular under the specific angle of the rewriting of a discourse (science) in another one (literature), this work proposes to make, starting from the work carried out on the matter, a fast draft of possible affinities and similarities between two manners of conceiving and of being expressed, and this, within the framework of an intertextual approach, also from the point of view of an interdisciplinary dialogue

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:The interaction of scientific and fictional ones, more generally, of literature and knowledge is a fact inherent in literary texts which offers the possibility of research on a vast territory still not explored.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Indeed, epistemology in literature, opened by the initiating book of Michel Pierssens: Savoir à l’oeuvre, followed by the semiological investigation of Roland Barthes in its De la science à la littérature is now a crucial question to pose.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Considered in particular under the specific angle of the rewriting of a discourse (science) in another one (literature), this work proposes to make, starting from the work carried out on the matter, a fast draft of possible affinities and similarities between two manners of conceiving and of being expressed, and this, within the framework of an intertextual approach, also from the point of view of an interdisciplinary dialogue
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

The interaction of scientific and fictional ones, more generally, of literature and knowledge is a fact inherent in literary texts which offers the possibility of research on a vast territory still not explored. Indeed, epistemology in literature, opened by the initiating book of Michel Pierssens: Savoir à l’oeuvre, followed by the semiological investigation of Roland Barthes in its De la science à la littérature is now a crucial question to pose. This fact concerning scienticity of literary discourse, which appears as a cultural reference on the surface of text, a simple quotation, in the form of an allusion, a concept or a theory, took quite a long time of the researchers, research centers, and periodicals. Considered in particular under the specific angle of the rewriting of a discourse (science) in another one (literature), this work proposes to make, starting from the work carried out on the matter, a fast draft of possible affinities and similarities between two manners of conceiving and of being expressed, and this, within the framework of an intertextual approach, also from the point of view of an interdisciplinary dialogue

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

AKTULUM, K. (2022). YAZIN VE BİLİM YA DA BİLİMSEL METİNLERİ YENİDEN YAZMAK. Frankofoni, Cilt: 0 - Sayı: 22, 177–195. https://ajindex.com/articles/518164

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (1)

  1. Y. Abrioux, Théorie, Littérature, Enseignement no 8, ‘Littérature et connaissance’, Presses Universitaires de Vincennes, 1990 2. R. Barthes, “De la science à la littérature”, in Le Bruissement de la langue, Seuil, 1993 3. Centre de Recherches sur l’Imaginaire, Science et Imaginaire, Université de Grenoble, 1985 4. C. Cohen, Bouvard et Pécuchet réécrivent les sciences, Alliage, no 37-38, 1998 5. Michel Clément, Jules Verne et les Sciences, Belin, 2005 6. L. Dahan-Gaida, Conversations entre la littérature, les arts et les sciences, Presses Universitaires de Franche-Comté, 2006 7. L. Dahan-Gaida, Musil, Savoir et Fiction, Presses Universitaires de Vincennes, 1994 8. Stéphanie Dord-Crouslé, Bouvard et Pécuchet de Flaubert, une encyclopédie critique en farce, Belin, 2000 9. Mélusine, ‘Le Surréalisme et la science’, no XXVII, l’Age d’Homme, 2007 10. M. Pierssens, Savoir à l’oeuvre, essais d’épistémocritique, Presses Universitaires de Lille, 1990 11. Les Réécritures littéraires des discours scientifiques, Textes réunis par Chantal Foucrier, Michel Houdiard Editeur, 2005 12. P. Siguret, Savoir et connaissance dans l’oeuvre de Georges Perec, Thèse présentée à l’École des Etudes supérieures de I’Université d’Ottawa, 1995