Dergiler / European Mechanical Science / 2022 / Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 2

Evaluating the effectiveness of combined hardening models to determine the behavior of a plate with a hole under combined loadings

Sayfa
97–104
Yayın Tarihi
2022-10-12
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

The results were compared with the literature study, and it was seen that presented hardening model provides accurate results in small cyclic strain range.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Geometrical discontinuities in a material such as holes and notches on machine elements are called as critical regions due to the stress concentrations.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:They are the potential failure initiation locations Therefore, researchers put significant effort on the prediction of the material response in these discontinuities under repetitive loadings.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:The results were compared with the literature study, and it was seen that presented hardening model provides accurate results in small cyclic strain range.
🔬Tür:Modelleme & Sayısal Simülasyon
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Cyclic Plasticity · Armstrong-Frederic Model · Kinematic Hardening

Abstract

Geometrical discontinuities in a material such as holes and notches on machine elements are called as critical regions due to the stress concentrations. They are the potential failure initiation locations Therefore, researchers put significant effort on the prediction of the material response in these discontinuities under repetitive loadings. Cyclic plasticity is concerned with the nonlinear material response under cyclic loadings. In this study, numerical cyclic stress – strain response of a plate with a hole was evaluated under the combined loadings which are cyclic bending and tensile loadings. Oxygen Free High Thermal Conductivity (OFHC) Copper alloy was considered as material, and finite element simulations were performed in Marc software. A user defined material subroutine known as Hypela2 was utilized in order to define the material response. The plasticity model used in the present study comprises J2 plasticity along with combined isotropic – kinematic hardening model. Evolution of the backstress was introduced by Armstrong – Frederic type kinematic hardening model. The results were compared with the literature study, and it was seen that presented hardening model provides accurate results in small cyclic strain range.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

AKŞEN, T. A., FIRAT, M., ÇAYLAK, M. (2022). Evaluating the effectiveness of combined hardening models to determine the behavior of a plate with a hole under combined loadings. European Mechanical Science, Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 2, 97–104. https://ajindex.com/articles/512365

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (13)

  1. Prager, W. (1956). A new method of analyzing stresses and strains in work hardening plastic solids. ASME Journal of Applied Mechanics, 23: 493-496. DOI:10.1115/1.4011389
  2. Besseling, J.F. (1958). A theory of plastic and creep deformations of an initially isotropic material. ASME Journal of Applied Mechanics, 25: 529-536, DOI:10.1115/1.4011867
  3. Mroz, Z. (1967). On the description of anisotropic work hardening. Journal of Mechanics and Physics of Solids, 15: 163-175, DOI:10.1016/0022-5096(67)90030-0
  4. Dafalias, Y.F., Popov, E.F. (1976). Plastic internal variables formalism of cyclic plasticity. ASME Journal of Applied Mechanics, 98: 645-651. DOI:10.1115/1.3423948
  5. Ohno, N., Wang, J.D., (1993). Kinematic hardening rules with critical state of dynamic recovery. Part 1: Formulations and basic features for ratcheting behavior. International Journal of Plasticity, 9: 375-390. DOI:10.1016/0749-6419(93)90042-O
  6. Armstrong, P.J., Frederic, C.O. (1966). A mathematical representation of the multiaxial Bauschinger effect. G.E.G.B. Report RD/B/N 731
  7. Ziegler, H.A. (1959). A modification of Prager’s hardening rule. Quarterly of Applied Mechanics, 17: 55-65. DOI:10.1090/qam/104405
  8. Firat, M. (2011). Notch strain calculation of a notched specimen under axial-torsion loadings. Materials and Design, 32: 3876–3882. DOI:10.1016/j.matdes.2011.03.005
  9. Firat, M. (2012). Cyclic plasticity modeling and finite element analyzes of a circumferentially notched round bar under combined axial and torsion loadings. Materials and Design, 34: 842-852. DOI:10.1016/j.matdes.2011.07.022
  10. Aksen, T.A., Esener, E., Firat, M. (2019). Investigation of Notch Root Strain Behaviors Under Combined Loadings, European Journal of Engineering and Natural Sciences, 3: 42-51
  11. Joo, G., Huh, H. (2018). Rate-dependent isotropic‒kinematic hardening model in tension ‒compression of TRIP and TWIP steel sheets. International Journal of Mechanical Sciences, 146–147: 432–444. DOI:10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2017.08.055
  12. Joo, G., Huh, H., Choi, M.K. (2016). Tension/compression hardening behaviors of auto-body steel sheets at intermediate strain rates. International Journal of Mechanical Sciences, 108-109: 174–187. DOI:10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2016.01.035
  13. Ohno, N., Tsuda, M., Kamei, T. (2013). Elastoplastic implicit integration algorithm applicable to both plane stress and three-dimensional stress states. Finite Elements in Analysis and Design, 66:1–11. DOI: 10.1016/j.finel.2012.1