KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / European Journal of Therapeutics / 2018 / Cilt: 24 - Sayı: 3

Effect of Combined Use of Photon-Initiated Photoacoustic Streaming and Chitosan on Smear Layer Removal

Fatih AKSOY
Fatih SARI
Samet TOSUN
Zübeyde GÜNDOĞAR UÇAR
Sayfa
158–162
Yayın Tarihi
2022-10-12
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

A statistical analysis was performed using the Kruskal-Wallis test.Results: In the overall evaluation, the remaining smear was significantly less for group 1 as compared to the other groups (p

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Objective: Ethylene diamine tetraacetic acid (EDTA) is an appropriate irrigant for smear removal.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Group 1: 0.2% chitosan irrigation withPIPS irradiation; Group 2: 0.2% chitosan alone; and Group 3: 17% EDTA.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:A statistical analysis was performed using the Kruskal-Wallis test.Results: In the overall evaluation, the remaining smear was significantly less for group 1 as compared to the other groups (p
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

Objective: Ethylene diamine tetraacetic acid (EDTA) is an appropriate irrigant for smear removal. This study aims to compare thesmear-removing capacity of chitosan in combination with photon-initiated photoacoustic streaming (PIPS) to that of EDTA.Methods: Forty-five human mandibular premolar teeth were included. Root canals were prepared with OneShape files. The sampleswere randomly divided into three equal groups. The final rinsing was done as follows. Group 1: 0.2% chitosan irrigation withPIPS irradiation; Group 2: 0.2% chitosan alone; and Group 3: 17% EDTA. All the roots were longitudinally split into two halves andexamined under SEM to assess the remaining smear. A statistical analysis was performed using the Kruskal-Wallis test.Results: In the overall evaluation, the remaining smear was significantly less for group 1 as compared to the other groups (p

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

AKSOY, F., SARI, F., TOSUN, S., UÇAR, Z. G. (2022). Effect of Combined Use of Photon-Initiated Photoacoustic Streaming and Chitosan on Smear Layer Removal. European Journal of Therapeutics, Cilt: 24 - Sayı: 3, 158–162. https://ajindex.com/articles/512296

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (13)

  1. McComb D, Smith DC. A preliminary scanning electron microscopic study of root canals after endodontic procedures. J Endod 1975; 1: 238-42.
  2. Schmidt TF, Teixeira CS, Felippe MC, Felippe WT, Pashley DH, Bortoluzzi DA. Effect of ultrasonic activation of irrigants on smear layer removal. J Endod 2015; 41: 1359-63.
  3. Orstavik D, Haapasalo M. Disinfection by endodontic irrigants and dressings of experimentally infected dentinal tubules. Endod Dent Traumatol 1990; 6: 142-9.
  4. Oksan T, Aktener BO, Sen BH, Tezel H. The penetration of root canal sealers into dentinal tubules. A scanning electron microscopic study. Int Endod J 1993; 26: 301-5.
  5. Srirekha A, Rashmi K, Hegde J, Lekha S, Rupali K, Reshmi G. An in vitro evaluation of passive ultrasonic agitation of different irrigants on smear layer removal after post space preparation: a scanning electron microscopic study. J Indian Prosthodont Soc 2013; 13: 240-6.
  6. Silva PV, Guedes DF, Nakadi FV, Pécora JD, Cruz-Filho AM. Chitosan: a new solution for removal of smear layer after root canal instrumentation. Int Endod J 2013; 46: 332-8.
  7. De Moor RJ, Meire M, Goharkhay K, Moritz A, Vanobbergen J. Efficacy of ultrasonic versus laser-activated irrigation to remove artificially placed dentin debris plugs. J Endod 2010; 36: 1580-3.
  8. Guidotti R, Merigo E, Fornaini C, Moritz A, Vanobbergen J. Er:YAG 2,940-nm laser fiber in endodontic treatment: a help in removing smear layer. Lasers Med Sci 2014; 29: 69-75.
  9. Murugesan MS, Rajasekaran M, Indra R, Suganthan P. Efficacy of Er, Cr: YSGG Laser with Conical Tip Design in Smear Layer Removal at the Apical Third of Curved Root Canals. Int J Las Dent 2013; 3: 55-9.
  10. Peters OA, Bardsley S, Fong J, Pandher G, Divito E. Disinfection of root canals with photon-initiated photoacoustic streaming. J Endod 2011; 37: 1008-12.
  11. Olivi G, DiVito E. Photoacoustic endodontics using PIPS™: experimental background and clinical protocol. J Laser Health Acad 2012; 1: 22-5. Kurita K. Chemistry and application of chitin and chitosan. Polymer Degradation and stability 1998; 59: 117-20.
  12. Senel S, Kas H, Squier CA. Application of chitosan in dental drug delivery and therapy. Chitosan per os: from dietary supplement to drug carrier Grottammare: Atec 2000; 241-56.
  13. Del Carpio-Perochena A, Bramante CM, Duarte MA, de Moura ME, Aouada FA, Kishen A. Chelating and antibacterial properties of chitosan nanoparticles on dentin. Restor Dent Endod 2015; 40: 195- 201. Del Carpio-Perochena A, Kishen A, Shrestha A, Bramante CM. Antibacter