Dergiler / European Journal of Therapeutics / 2021 / Cilt: 27 - Sayı: 3

The Effect of Acromiohumeral Distance on Isolated Supraspinatus Tendon Tear Repair

Sayfa
192–198
Yayın Tarihi
2022-10-12
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Conclusion: The preoperative acromiohumeral distance has no prognostic value in predicting postoperative functional outcomes.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Objective: The aim of this study is to evaluate whether preoperative acromiohumeral distance has any prognostic value in predicting postoperative functional outcomes after repair of isolated supraspinatus tear.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Methods: Patients who underwent arthroscopic supraspinatus tear repair between 2015 and 2019 were evaluated retrospectively.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Conclusion: The preoperative acromiohumeral distance has no prognostic value in predicting postoperative functional outcomes.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:2015 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study is to evaluate whether preoperative acromiohumeral distance has any prognostic value in predicting postoperative functional outcomes after repair of isolated supraspinatus tear. Methods: Patients who underwent arthroscopic supraspinatus tear repair between 2015 and 2019 were evaluated retrospectively. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and arthroscopic findings of tears were classified according to Patte classification; patients in group II, segment III in the sagittal plane, levels 1 and 2 in the frontal plane, biceps tendon intact, and without acromioplasty were included in this study. Group I consisted of 63 patients (F ¼ 38; M ¼ 25) with the tear at the insertion level and group II with 41 patients (F ¼ 23; M ¼ 18) with the stump at the level of the caput humeri. Preoperative and postoperative radiographs and MRI were compared by measuring the acromiohumeral distances of the patients. Patients were evaluated functionally with the use of American Shoulder and elbow surgeon shoulder score and Constant-Murley score. Results: There was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of age, gender, and the affected side. Jobe and drop sign test results were significantly positive in group II. There was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of functional scores, preoperatively and postoperatively. There was a statistically significant improvement in group I in postoperative abduction, flexion, and external rotation movements in terms of joint range of motion. In radiological evaluation, there was a statistically significant difference in all measurements in group I compared to group II. Conclusion: The preoperative acromiohumeral distance has no prognostic value in predicting postoperative functional outcomes.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

ÖZTÜRK, T., ERPALA, F. (2022). The Effect of Acromiohumeral Distance on Isolated Supraspinatus Tendon Tear Repair. European Journal of Therapeutics, Cilt: 27 - Sayı: 3, 192–198. https://ajindex.com/articles/512140

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (15)

  1. Su W-R, Budoff JE, Luo Z-P. Posterosuperior displacement due to rotator cuff tears. Arthrosc J Arthrosc Relat Surg. 2011
  2. [CrossRef] 2. Weiner DS, Macnab I. Superior migration of the humeral head. A radiological aid in the diagnosis of tears of the rotator cuff. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1970
  3. Golding FC. The shoulder—The forgotten joint. BJR. 1962
  4. [CrossRef] 4. Kaneko K, DeMouy EH, Brunet ME. Massive rotator cuff tears. Screening by routine radiographs. Clin Imaging. 1995
  5. [CrossRef] 5. Goutallier D, Le Guilloux P, Postel J-M, Radier C, Bernageau J, Zilber S. Acromio humeral distance less than six millimeter: Its meaning in full-thickness rotator cuff tear. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2011
  6. [CrossRef] 6. Hamada K, Fukuda H, Mikasa M, Kobayashi Y. Roentgenographic findings in massive rotator cuff tears. A long-term observation. Clin Orthop. 1990
  7. Apreleva M, Ozbaydar M, Fitzgibbons PG, Warner JJP. Rotator cuff tears: The effect of the reconstruction method on threedimensional repair site area. Arthrosc J Arthrosc Relat Surg. 2002
  8. [CrossRef] 8. Saupe N, Pfirrmann CWA, Schmid MR, Jost B, Werner CML, Zanetti M. Association between rotator cuff abnormalities and reduced acromiohumeral distance. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2006
  9. [CrossRef] 9. Mura N, O’Driscoll SW, Zobitz ME, et al. The effect of infraspinatus disruption on glenohumeral torque and superior migration of the humeral head: A biomechanical study. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2003
  10. [CrossRef] 10. Nove´-Josserand L, Edwards TB, O’Connor DP, Walch G. The acromiohumeral and coracohumeral intervals are abnormal in rotator cuff tears with muscular fatty degeneration. Clin Orthop. 2005
  11. Keener JD, Wei AS, Kim HM, Steger-May K, Yamaguchi K. Proximal humeral migration in shoulders with symptomatic and asymptomatic rotator cuff tears. J. Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009
  12. [CrossRef] 12. Oh JH, Kim SH, Shin SH, et al. Outcome of rotator cuff repair in large-to-massive tear with pseudoparalysis: A comparative study with propensity score matching. Am J Sports Med. 2011
  13. [CrossRef] 13. Patte D. Classification of rotator cuff lesions. Clin Orthop. 1990
  14. Werner CM, Conrad SJ, Meyer DC, Keller A, Hodler J, Gerber C. Intermethod agreement and interobserver correlation of radiologic acromiohumeral distance measurements. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2008
  15. [CrossRef] 15. Gruber