Dergiler / European Journal of Rheumatology / 2022 / Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 2

A real-life analysis of patients with rheumatologic diseases on biological treatments: Data from TURKBIO Registry

Sayfa
82–87
Yayın Tarihi
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Conclusion: TURKBIO provided a valuable real-life experience with the use of biologics in rheumatic diseases in Turkey.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Objective: TURKBIO registry, established in 2011, is the first nationwide biological database in Turkey.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:This study aimed to provide an overview of TURKBIO data collected by June 2018.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Conclusion: TURKBIO provided a valuable real-life experience with the use of biologics in rheumatic diseases in Turkey.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:2011 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

Objective: TURKBIO registry, established in 2011, is the first nationwide biological database in Turkey. This study aimed to provide an overview of TURKBIO data collected by June 2018. Methods: The registry included adult patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), ankylosing spondylitis (AS), nonradiographic axial spondyloarthritis (nr-AxSpA), and psoriatic arthritis (PsA). Demographic and clinical features, disease activity markers, and other follow-up parameters, current and previous treatments, and adverse events were registered electronically at each visit using open-source software. The registration of patient-reported outcome measures was carried out electronically by the patients using touch screens. Results: TURKBIO registry included a total of 41,145 treatment series with biologicals. There were 2,588 patients with axSpA (2,459 AS and 129 nr-axSpA), 2,036 with RA, and 428 with PsA. The total number of patients, including those with other diagnoses, was 5,718. In the follow-up period, the number of patients and also visits steadily increased by years. The yearly mean number of visits per patient was found to be 2.3. Significant improvements in disease activity and health assessment parameters were observed following the biological treatments. Biologics were often given in combination with a conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drug in patients with RA. Infections were the most commonly seen adverse events, followed by allergic reactions. Tuberculosis was observed in 12 patients, malignancy in 18, and treatment-related mortality in 31. Conclusion: TURKBIO provided a valuable real-life experience with the use of biologics in rheumatic diseases in Turkey.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

ERTEN, Ş., YILDIZ, F., ÇETİN, G. Y., YAZICI, A., CEFLE, A., YILMAZ, S., YOLBAŞ, S., PEHLİVAN, Y., KROGH, N. S., ŞENEL, S., İNANÇ, N., DİRESKENELİ, H., KOCA, S. S., GÖKER, B., TUFAN, A., HAZNEDAROĞLU, S., ÖZTÜRK, M. A., BEŞ, C., SO, Ö. (2022). A real-life analysis of patients with rheumatologic diseases on biological treatments: Data from TURKBIO Registry. European Journal of Rheumatology, Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 2, 82–87. https://ajindex.com/articles/511450

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (9)

  1. Hetland ML. DANBIO: A nationwide registry of biological therapies in Denmark. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2005;23(5 Suppl. 39):S205-S207
  2. Kvien TK, Heiberg LE, Kaufmann C, et al. A Norwegian DMARD register: Prescriptions of DMARDs and biological agents to patients with inflammatory rheumatic diseases. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2005;23(5 Suppl. 39):S188-S194
  3. Akar S, Birlik M, Gurler O, et al. The prevalence of rheumatoid arthritis in an urban population of Izmir-Turkey. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2004;22(4):416-420
  4. Onen F, Solmaz D, Cetin P, et al. Prevalence of inflammatory back pain and axial spondyloarthritis among university employees in Izmir, Turkey. J Rheumatol. 2015;42(9):1647-1651. [CrossRef] 5. Onen F, Akar S, Birlik M, et al. Prevalence of ankylosing spondylitis and related spondyloarthritides in an urban area of Izmir, Turkey. J Rheumatol. 2008;35(2):305-309
  5. Grigor C, Capell H, Stirling A, et al. Effect of a treatment strategy of tight control for rheumatoid arthritis (the TICORA study): A single-blind randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2004;364(9430):263-269. [CrossRef] 7. Coates LC, Moverley AR, McParland L, et al. Effect of tight control of inflammation in early psoriatic arthritis (TICOPA): A UK multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2015;386(10012):2489-2498. [CrossRef] 8. Inanc N, Ertu¨ rk Z, Ozen G, et al. AB0278 investigation of poor prognostic factors among rheumatoid arthritis patients in TURKBIO registry. Ann Rheum Dis. 2018;77(Suppl. 2):1319
  6. Inanc N, Ozen G, Yalcinkaya Y, et al. FRI0134. Is there any difference in Ra patients for methotrexate use vs. leflunomide use as a concomitant treatment with biological and targeted synthetic DMARDS in TURKBIO registry? Ann Rheum Dis. 2018;77(Suppl. 2):611.2-612
  7. Zengin B, Inanc¸ N, Akar S, et al. AB0482. Similar efficacy of tofacitinib on disease activity in rheumatoid arthritis patients with and without previous biologicals; results from the TURKBIO registry. Ann Rheum Dis. 2018;77(Suppl. 2):1401.3-1402
  8. Koca SS, Karatas A, Oz B, et al. Index does not affect response to rituximab in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: Results from Turkbio registry [abstract]. In ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting. American College of Rheumatology, 2017: 69
  9. Babaoglu H, Goker B, _Inanc¸ N, et al. Impact of obesity on drug survival of tofacitinib in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: Analysis from the Turkbio registry [abstract]. In ACR/ ARHP Annual Meeting. American College of Rheuma