Dergiler / European Journal of Rheumatology / 2022 / Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 2

Treatment with biologic DMARDs may not adversely affect lung nodules in rheumatoid arthritis patients

Sayfa
75–81
Yayın Tarihi
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Moreover, bDMARDs/ tofacitinib might result in regression in LNs

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Objective: Lung nodules (LNs) impose diagnostic and therapeutic challenges in patients with rheuma- toid arthritis (RA) due to unpredictable outcomes.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Methods: Electronic health records of RA patients who had LNs detected on computed tomography (CT) between January 2015 and December 2020 were evaluated retrospectively.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Moreover, bDMARDs/ tofacitinib might result in regression in LNs
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:2015 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

Objective: Lung nodules (LNs) impose diagnostic and therapeutic challenges in patients with rheuma- toid arthritis (RA) due to unpredictable outcomes. Potential induction of nodulosis with the use of con- ventional synthetic DMARDs (csDMARD) and lack of knowledge regarding the effect of biologic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (bDMARDs)/tofacitinib on the LN raise concerns and have an impact on treatment decisions. This study aims to evaluate the possible effects of the bDMARDs/tofa- citinib and csDMARDS on LNs observed in RA patients. Methods: Electronic health records of RA patients who had LNs detected on computed tomography (CT) between January 2015 and December 2020 were evaluated retrospectively. Patients with follow- up CT images were included in the study. Baseline and follow-up images were meticulously examined for the number, size, attenuation, and cavity formation. Clinical, histopathologic, and laboratory find- ings were analyzed. Results: Forty-two RA patients with LNs were studied, 21 were on bDMARDs/tofacitinib (11 females, mean age: 59.7 6 8.4) and 21 were on csDMARDs (12 females, mean age: 71.4 6 8.3). The proportion of patients with progressed nodules during follow-up was comparable between groups (six patients in bDMARDs/tofacitinib vs seven patients in csDMARDs). Progression of LNs was observed in six patients in the bDMARDs/tofacitinib group: three in anti-TNFa, two in rituximab, and one in abatacept users and none in tofacitinib users. Conclusion: Our results suggest that the risk of progression in LNs in RA patients with use of bDMARDs/tofacitinib might not impose a higher risk compared to csDMARDs. Moreover, bDMARDs/ tofacitinib might result in regression in LNs

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

Haznedaroğlu, Ş., Salman, R. B., Güler, A. A., Tufan, A., Göker, B., Öztürk, M. A., Babaoğlu, H., Cindil, E., Karadeniz, H., Satiş, H., Ataş, N. (2022). Treatment with biologic DMARDs may not adversely affect lung nodules in rheumatoid arthritis patients. European Journal of Rheumatology, Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 2, 75–81. https://ajindex.com/articles/511449

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (15)

  1. Brown KK. Rheumatoid lung disease. Proc Am Thorac Soc. 2007
  2. 4(5):443-448. [CrossRef] 2. Chansakul T, Dellaripa PF, Doyle TJ, Madan R. Intra-thoracic rheumatoid arthritis: Imaging spectrum of typical findings and treatment related complications. Eur J Radiol. 2015
  3. 84(10):1981-1991. [CrossRef] 3. Sargin G, Senturk T. Multiple pulmonary rheu- matoid nodules. Reumatologia. 2015
  4. 5 (5):276- 278. [CrossRef] 4. Patterson JW. Rheumatoid nodule and subcu- taneous granuloma annulare. A comparative histologic study. Am J Dermatopathol. 1988
  5. 10(1):1-8. [CrossRef] 5. Wikaningrum R, Highton J, Parker A, et al. Path- ogenic mechanisms in the rheumatoid nodule: Comparison of proinflammatory cytokine pro- duction and cell adhesion molecule expression in rheumatoid nodules and synovial mem- branes from the same patient. Arthritis Rheum. 1998
  6. 41(10):1783-1797. [CrossRef] 6. Sagdeo P, Gattimallanahali Y, Kakade G, Canchi B. Rheumatoid lung nodule. BMJ Case Rep. 2015
  7. bcr2015213083. 7. Glace B, Gottenberg JE, Mariette X, et al. Effi- cacy of rituximab in the treatment of pulmo- nary rheumatoid nodules: Findings in 10 patients from the French AutoImmunity and Rituximab/Rheumatoid Arthritis registry (AIR/ PR registry). Ann Rheum Dis. 2012
  8. 71(8):1429- 1431. [CrossRef] 8. Akiyama M, Mawatari T, Nakashima Y, et al. Prevalence of dyslipidemia in Japanese patients with rheumatoid arthritis and effects of atorvastatin treatment. Clin Rheumatol. 2015
  9. 34(11):1867-1875. [CrossRef] 9. Alpert JB, Ko JP. Management of incidental lung nodules: Current strategy and rationale. Radiol Clin N Am. 2018
  10. 56(3):339-351. 10. Somarouthu B, Lee SI, Urban T, Sadow CA, Harris GJ, Kambadakone A. Immune-related tumour response assessment criteria: A com- prehensive review. Br J Radiol. 2018
  11. 91(1084):20170457. [CrossRef] 11. Liote ́ H. Pulmonary manifestation of rheuma- toid arthritis. Rev Mal Respir. 2008
  12. [CrossRef] 12. Truong MT, Ko JP, Rossi SE, et al. Update in the evaluation of the solitary pulmonary nodule. Radiographics. 2014
  13. 34(6):1658-1679. [Cross- Ref] 13. Attar SM. Adverse effects of low dose metho- trexate in rheumatoid arthritis patients. A hospital-based study. Saudi Med J. 2010
  14. 31(8):909-915. 14. Makihara S, Kariya S, Noujima-Harada M, et al. Methotrexate-associated lymphoproliferative disorder with multiple pulmonary nodules and bilateral cervical lymphadenopathy. Auris Nasus Larynx. 2019
  15. 46(6):927-933. [CrossRef] 15. Kim SH, Yoo WH. Recurrent pneumothorax associated with