Dergiler / European Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics (elektronik) / 2012 / Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 3

Performance of information complexity criteria in structural equation models with applications

Sayfa
282–301
Yayın Tarihi
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Our results show the versatility of the new proposed method where both the goodness-of fit and the complexity of the model is taken into account in one criterion function.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:A common problem in structural equation modeling is that of model selection.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:To study the empirical performance of the information criteria, we use a well-known SEM simulation protocol, and demonstrate that most of the information-theoretic criteria select the “pseudo true” model with very high frequencies.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Our results show the versatility of the new proposed method where both the goodness-of fit and the complexity of the model is taken into account in one criterion function.
🔬Tür:Modelleme & Sayısal Simülasyon
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

A common problem in structural equation modeling is that of model selection. Many researchers have addressed this problem, but many methods have provided mixed benefits until recently. Akaike’s well-known criteria, AIC, has been applied in the context of structural equation modeling, but the effectiveness of many other information criteria have not been studied in a convincing manner. In this paper, we compare the SEM model selection prowess of several AIC-type and ICOMP-type criteria. We also introduce two new large sample consistent forms of Bozdogan’s ICOMP criteria - one of which is robust to model misspecification. To study the empirical performance of the information criteria, we use a well-known SEM simulation protocol, and demonstrate that most of the information-theoretic criteria select the “pseudo true” model with very high frequencies. We also demonstrate, however, that the performance of AIC is inversely related to the sample size. Finally, we apply the new criteria to select an analytical model for a real dataset from a retail marketing study of consumer behavior. Our results show the versatility of the new proposed method where both the goodness-of fit and the complexity of the model is taken into account in one criterion function.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

BOZDOGAN, H., HOWE, E. D., KIROĞLU, G. (2022). Performance of information complexity criteria in structural equation models with applications. European Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics (elektronik), Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 3, 282–301. https://ajindex.com/articles/511256

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (14)

  1. H Akaike. Information theory and an extension of the maximum likelihood principle. In B.N. Petrox and F. Csaki, editors, Second International Symposium on Information Theory., pages 267–281, Budapest, 1973. Academiai Kiado
  2. H Akaike. Factor analysis and AIC. Psychometrica, 52(3):317–332, 1987
  3. K A Bollen. Structural Equations with Latent Variables. John Wiley,New York, 1989
  4. H Bozdogan. Model selection and akaike’s information criteria (AIC): the general theory and its analytical extensions. Psychometrica, 52:317–332, 1987
  5. H Bozdogan. A new information theoretic measure of complexity index for model evaluation in general structural equation models with latent variables. Rutgers the State Univarsity, June 13-16 1991. Symposium on Model Selection in Covariance Structures at the Joint Meeting of Psychometric Society and The Classification Society
  6. H Bozdogan. Choosing the number of clusters, subset selection of variables, and outlier detection in the standard mixture-model cluster analysis. In E. Diday et al., editor, New Approaches in Classification and Data Analysis, pages 169–177. Springer-Verlag, New York, 1994
  7. H Bozdogan. Akaike’s information criterion and recent developments in information complexity. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 44:62–91, 2000
  8. H Bozdogan. Statistical Data Mining Knowledge Discovery, chapter Intelligent Statistical Data Mining with Information Complexity and Genetic Algorithms., pages 15–56. ChapmanHall,CRC, 2004
  9. H Bozdogan. A new class of information complexity (ICOMP) criteria with an application to customer profiling and segmentation. Journal of the School of Business Administration, 39(2):370–398, 2010
  10. H Bozdogan and M Ueno. A unified approach to information-theoretic and bayesian model selection criteria. Crete, Greece, 2000. The 6th World Meeting of the International Society for Bayesian Analysis
  11. N Cliff. Some cautions concerning the application of causal modeling methods. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 18:115–126, 1983
  12. H Cramér. Mathematical Methods of Statistics. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey, 1946
  13. E Deniz, H Bozdogan, and S Katraggadda. Structural equation modeling (SEM) of categorical and mixed-data using the novel gifi transformations and information complexity (ICOMP) criterion. Journal of the School of Business Administration, 40(1):86–123, 2011
  14. E A Deniz. Information Criteria in Structural Equation Models. unpublished ph.d.