Dergiler / European Journal of Breast Health / 2019 / Cilt: 15 - Sayı: 3

Imaging Findings and Clinicopathological Correlation of Breast Cancer in Women under 40 Years Old

Sayfa
147–152
Yayın Tarihi
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Ultrasonography is the main modality for the diagnosis of breast cancer in young women, but mammography and magnetic resonance imaging can help in both diagnosis and evaluation of the extent of disease.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical, imaging and histopathological features of breast cancer in patients aged under 40 yearsof age.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:The relationship between radiological characteristics and histopathological features was also investigated.Materials and Methods: The study included 131 patients aged under 40 years, diagnosed pathologically with breast cancer.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Ultrasonography is the main modality for the diagnosis of breast cancer in young women, but mammography and magnetic resonance imaging can help in both diagnosis and evaluation of the extent of disease.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical, imaging and histopathological features of breast cancer in patients aged under 40 yearsof age. The relationship between radiological characteristics and histopathological features was also investigated.Materials and Methods: The study included 131 patients aged under 40 years, diagnosed pathologically with breast cancer. A retrospective evaluation was made of the imaging and clinicopathological findings and the relationship between pathological and imaging findings was investigated.Results: Most of the cancers were detected from clinical symptoms, especially a palpable mass (76.3%). The most common histological typeof tumor was invasive ductal carcinoma and 64.8% of the tumors were high grade tumors. The predominant features were irregular borders(92.4%), microlobulated-angulated contours (43.5%), hypo-homogeneous internal echogenicity (80.9%) on ultrasonography, and the presence ofa mass (41.2%) and suspicious microcalcifications (40.2%) on mammography. Magnetic resonance imaging commonly showed mass enhancement(66.7%) with type 2 or 3 dynamic curve (92.6%). High-grade tumors were associated with posterior acoustic enhancement (p: 0.03) while low-gradetumors presented with spiculated margins more than high grade tumors (p: 0.04).Conclusion: Breast cancer in women aged under 40 years usually presents with a self-detected palpable mass and can show different imagingfindings according to the histological grade. Ultrasonography is the main modality for the diagnosis of breast cancer in young women, but mammography and magnetic resonance imaging can help in both diagnosis and evaluation of the extent of disease.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

KÖSEMEHMETOĞLU, K., DURHAN, G., KARAKAYA, J., ÜNER, A., AZİZOVA, A., ÖNDER, Ö., AKPINAR, M. G., DEMİRKAZIK, F. (2022). Imaging Findings and Clinicopathological Correlation of Breast Cancer in Women under 40 Years Old. European Journal of Breast Health, Cilt: 15 - Sayı: 3, 147–152. https://ajindex.com/articles/510799

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (2)

  1. Assi HA, Khoury KE, Dbouk H, Khalil LE, Mouhieddine TH, El Saghir NS. Epidemiology and prognosis of breast cancer in young women. J Thorac Dis 2013; 5 (Suppl 1): S2-S8. (PMID: 23819024
  2. Anders CK, Johnson R, Litton J, Phillips M, Bleyer A. Breast cancer before age 40 years. Semin Oncol 2009; 36: 237-249. (PMID: 19460581) [CrossRef] 3. Han W, Kim SW, Park IA, Kang D, Kim SW, Youn YK, Oh SK, Choe KJ, Noh DY. Young age: an independent risk factor for disease-free survival in women with operable breast cancer. BMC Cancer 2004; 4: 82. (PMID: 15546499) [CrossRef] 4. Gnerlich JL, Deshpande AD, Jeffe DB, Sweet A, White N, Margenthaler JA. Elevated breast cancer mortality in women younger than age 40 years compared with older women is attributed to poorer survival in early-stage disease. J Am Coll Surg 2009; 208: 341-347. (PMID: 19317994) [CrossRef] 5. Fredholm H, Magnusson K, Lindström LS, Garmo H, Fält SE, Lindman H, Bergh J, Holmberg L, Pontén F, Frisell J, Fredriksson I. Long-term outcome in young women with breast cancer: a population-based study. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2016; 160: 131-143. (PMID: 27624330) [CrossRef] 6. An YY, Kim SH, Kang BJ, Park CS, Jung NY, Kim JY. Breast cancer in very young women ( 7. Redmond CE, Healy GM, Murphy CF, O'Doherty A, Foster A. The use of ultrasonography and digital mammography in women under 40 years with symptomatic breast cancer: a 7-year Irish experience. Ir J Med Sci 2017; 186: 63-67. (PMID: 27271165) [CrossRef] 8. Freer PE. Mammographic breast density: impact on breast cancer risk and implications for screening. Radiographics 2015; 35: 302-315. (PMID: 25763718) [CrossRef] 9. Destounis S, Santacroce A. Age to Begin and Intervals for Breast Cancer Screening: Balancing Benefits and Harms. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2018; 210: 279-284. (PMID: 29064754) [CrossRef] 10. Yamada T, Mori N, Watanabe M, Kimijima I, Okumoto T, Seiji K, Takahashi S. Radiologic-pathologic correlation of ductal carcinoma in situ. Radiographics 2010; 30: 1183-1198. (PMID: 20833844) [CrossRef] 11. Shannon C, Smith IE. Breast cancer in adolescents and young women. Eur J Cancer 2003; 39: 2632-2642. (PMID: 14642925) [CrossRef] 12. Fredholm H, Magnusson K, Lindström LS, Tobin NP, Lindman H, Bergh J, Holmberg L, Pontén F, Frisell J, Fredriksson I. Breast cancer in young women and prognosis: How important are proliferation markers? Eur J Cancer 2017; 84: 278-289. (PMID: 28844016) [CrossRef] 13. Kollias J, Elston CW, Ellis IO, Robertson JF, Blamey RW. Early-on