Dergiler / European Journal of Breast Health / 2021 / Cilt: 17 - Sayı: 2

Evaluation of Factors Related to Postoperative Complications in Patients Who Underwent Reduction Mammoplasty

Sayfa
157–164
Yayın Tarihi
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Our findings do not suggest that any of the techniques have significant superiority to each other in terms of pedicle safety andoverall complication rate.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Objective: This study aimed to investigate whether there was an increase in the number of postoperative complications in patients undergoing reductionmammoplasty depending on the technique used (i.e., pedicle type, skin incision pattern), existence of concomitant diseases, and presence of other riskfactors.Materials and Methods: A total of 186 patients who underwent breast reduction between 2013 and 2018 (bilateral, n = 170; unilateral, n = 16) wereincluded in the study.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:A retrospective review of the data of patients who underwent reduction mammoplasty, which was performed by the same surgical teamin a single institution over a 6-year period, was carried out.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Our findings do not suggest that any of the techniques have significant superiority to each other in terms of pedicle safety andoverall complication rate.
🔬Tür:Literatür & Derleme Çalışması
📍Kapsam:2013 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to investigate whether there was an increase in the number of postoperative complications in patients undergoing reductionmammoplasty depending on the technique used (i.e., pedicle type, skin incision pattern), existence of concomitant diseases, and presence of other riskfactors.Materials and Methods: A total of 186 patients who underwent breast reduction between 2013 and 2018 (bilateral, n = 170; unilateral, n = 16) wereincluded in the study. A retrospective review of the data of patients who underwent reduction mammoplasty, which was performed by the same surgical teamin a single institution over a 6-year period, was carried out. Superomedial, superior, and inferior pedicles were used in 99, 55, and 32 patients, respectively.The median follow-up period was 4 years.Results: The median patient age was 45 (range: 16–75) years. The median total reduction weight was 2,194 (range: 80–4,800) grams. The mediandistance between the sternal notch and nipple was 31 cm (range: 24–45 cm) for the right breast and 30 cm (range: 22–45 cm) for the left breast. The overallcomplication rate was 6.9%. The complication rates in patients with and without any concomitant diseases were 10.2% and 4.6%, respectively. The overallcomplication rate was significantly higher in patients with smoking habit, accessory breasts, progesterone use, cerebrovascular disease, morbid obesity (BodyMass Index ≥40 kg/m2), and thalassemia.Conclusion: Our analysis shows that the presence of concomitant diseases increases the risk for postoperative complications in patients who underwentreduction mammoplasty. Our findings do not suggest that any of the techniques have significant superiority to each other in terms of pedicle safety andoverall complication rate.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

TOPLU, G., SERİN, M., ALTINEL, D. (2022). Evaluation of Factors Related to Postoperative Complications in Patients Who Underwent Reduction Mammoplasty. European Journal of Breast Health, Cilt: 17 - Sayı: 2, 157–164. https://ajindex.com/articles/510708

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (1)

  1. Chung KC. Grabb and Smith’s Plastic Surgery. 8th ed. Philadelphia, United States: Wolters Kluwer Health; 2010. [CrossRef] 2. Blomqvist L, Eriksson A, Brandberg Y. Reduction mammaplasty provides long-term improvement in health status and quality of life. Plast Reconstr Surg 2000; 106: 991-997. (PMID: 11039369) [CrossRef] 3. Brown AP, Hill C, Khan K. Outcome of reduction mammaplasty- -a patients' perspective. Br J Plast Surg 2000; 53: 584-587. (PMID: 11000075) [CrossRef] 4. Chao JD, Memmel HC, Redding JF, Egan L, Odom LC, Casas LA. Reduction mammaplasty is a functional operation, improving quality of life in symptomatic women: a prospective, single-center breast reduction outcome study. Plast Reconstr Surg 2002; 110: 1644-1652; discussion 53-4. (PMID: 12447043) [CrossRef] 5. Cherchel A, Azzam C, De Mey A. Breastfeeding after vertical reduction mammaplasty using a superior pedicle. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2007; 60: 465-470. (PMID: 17399654) [CrossRef] 6. Dabbah A, Lehman JA Jr, Parker MG, Tantri D, Wagner DS. Reduction mammaplasty: an outcome analysis. Ann Plast Surg 1995; 35: 337-341. (PMID: 8585673) [CrossRef] 7. Eggert E, Schuss R, Edsander-Nord A. Clinical outcome, quality of life, patients' satisfaction, and aesthetic results, after reduction mammaplasty. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg 2009; 43: 201-206. (PMID: 19688643) [CrossRef] 8. Miller BJ, Morris SF, Sigurdson LL, Bendor-Samuel RL, Brennan M, Davis G, et al. Prospective study of outcomes after reduction mammaplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 2005; 115: 1025-1031; discussion 32- 3. (PMID: 15793440) [CrossRef] 9. O'Blenes CA, Delbridge CL, Miller BJ, Pantelis A, Morris SF. Prospective study of outcomes after reduction mammaplasty: long-term follow-up. Plast Reconstr Surg 2006; 117: 351-358. (PMID: 16462312) [CrossRef] 10. Iwuagwu OC, Platt AJ, Stanley PW, Hart NB, Drew PJ. Does reduction mammaplasty improve lung function test in women with macromastia? Results of a randomized controlled trial. Plast Reconstr Surg 2006; 118: 1-6; discussion 7. (PMID: 16816661) [CrossRef] 11. Mello AA, Domingos NA, Miyazaki MC. Improvement in quality of life and self-esteem after breast reduction surgery. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2010; 34: 59-64. (PMID: 19768493) [CrossRef] 12. Romeo M, Cuccia G, Zirilli A, Weiler-Mithoff E, Stagno d'Alcontres F. Reduction mammaplasty and related impact on psychosexual function. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2010; 63: 2112-2116. (PMID: 20207212) [CrossRef] 13. Saariniemi KM, Kera