Dergiler / European Journal of Breast Health / 2021 / Cilt: 17 - Sayı: 4

The Effect of Breast Size and Density in Turkish Women on Radiation Dose in Full-Field Digital Mammography

Sayfa
29–33
Yayın Tarihi
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

The participants were divided into two groups: those exposed to high doses (>3 mGy) and those exposed to low doses (

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Objective: The purpose of this study was to look into the relationship between breast size and mammographic breast density in women and breast radiation dose on full-field digital mammography (FFDM), as well as the factors that influence radiation dose.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Materials and Methods: The study included a total of 2,060 FFDM images from 515 consecutive participants.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:The participants were divided into two groups: those exposed to high doses (>3 mGy) and those exposed to low doses (
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

Objective: The purpose of this study was to look into the relationship between breast size and mammographic breast density in women and breast radiation dose on full-field digital mammography (FFDM), as well as the factors that influence radiation dose. Materials and Methods: The study included a total of 2,060 FFDM images from 515 consecutive participants. The participants were divided into two groups: those exposed to high doses (>3 mGy) and those exposed to low doses (

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

ÖZTÜRK, M., SOYLU, A. İ., SOYLU, A. V. (2022). The Effect of Breast Size and Density in Turkish Women on Radiation Dose in Full-Field Digital Mammography. European Journal of Breast Health, Cilt: 17 - Sayı: 4, 29–33. https://ajindex.com/articles/510687

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (12)

  1. National Research Council (US) Committee to Assess Health Risks from Exposure to Low Level of Ionizing Radiation. Health risks from exposure to low levels of ionizing radiation: BEIR VII phase 2. Washington: National Academies Press
  2. p. 406. [Crossref] Preston DL, Pierce DA, Shimizu Y, Cullings HM, Fujita S, Funamoto S, et al. Effect of recent changes in atomic bomb survivor dosimetry on cancer mortality risk estimates. Radiat Res 2004
  3. (PMID: 15447045) [Crossref] Turkey cancer statistics. T.C. Ministry of Health, Public Health Agency of Turkey, Ankara 2016. Available at: https://hsgm.saglik.gov.tr/tr/kanseristatistikleri/yillar/2016-yili-turkiye-kanser-i-statistikleri.html [Crossref] Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Siegel RL, Torre LA, Jemal A. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin 2018
  4. (PMID: 30207593) [Crossref] Migowski A. [Early detection of breast cancer and the interpretation of results of survival studies]. Cien Saude Coletiva 2015
  5. (PMID: 25923642) [Crossref] Funke M. [Diagnostic imaging of breast cancer: an update.] Radiologe 2016
  6. (PMID: 27600118) [Crossref] Lee CH, Dershaw DD, Kopans D, Evans P, Monsees B, Monticciolo D, et al. Breast cancer screening with imaging: recommendations from the Society of Breast Imaging and the ACR on the use of mammography, breast MRI, breast ultrasound, and other technologies for the detection of clinically occult breast cancer. J Am Coll Radiol 2010
  7. (PMID: 20129267) [Crossref] Law J, Faulkner K, Young KC. Risk factors for induction of breast cancer by X-rays and their implications for breast screening. Br J Radiol 2007
  8. (PMID: 17038413) [Crossref] Boice JD. Cancer following medical irradiation. Cancer 1981
  9. (PMID: 7237365) [Crossref] Radiology ACo. BI-RADS Mammography 2013-ACR BI-RADS Atlas, 5th ed. Reston, VA: American College of Radiology
  10. 2013 [Crossref] Kalbhen C, McGill J, Fendley P, Corrigan K, Angelats J. Mamographic determination of breast volume: comparing different methods.AJR Am J Roentgenol 1999
  11. (PMID: 10584814) [Crossref] Rostas JW, Bhutiani N, Crigger M, Crawford SMW, Hollenbach RB, Heidrich SR, et al. Calculation of breast volumes from mammogram: comparison of four separate equations relative to mastectomy specimen volumes. J Surg Oncol 2018
  12. (PMID: 29790170) [Crossref]