KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / European Endodontic Journal / 2018 / Cilt: 3 - Sayı: 3

Root Dentine Thickness and Concavity Depth in Mandibular Molars: A Cone Beam Computed Tomography Population Study

Juan Gonzalo OLIVIERI
Fernando DURAN-SINDREU
Sayfa
160–166
Yayın Tarihi
2022-10-12
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

The distal concavity was significantly deeper in the 1 and 2 mm levels (P

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Objective: The purposes of the present study were to evaluate dentine thickness and concavity depth belowthe furcation level of the mesial canals of the mandibular first and second molars, to examine differencesbetween gender, age, and quadrant, and to prove if there is a relationship between root length and dentinethickness.Methods: Two hundred eleven mandibular first and second molars were included in this study.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Measurements of dentine thickness fromthe external border of the root canal to the external root surface and concavity depth were recorded 1, 2, and4 mm below the furcation level.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:The distal concavity was significantly deeper in the 1 and 2 mm levels (P
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

Objective: The purposes of the present study were to evaluate dentine thickness and concavity depth belowthe furcation level of the mesial canals of the mandibular first and second molars, to examine differencesbetween gender, age, and quadrant, and to prove if there is a relationship between root length and dentinethickness.Methods: Two hundred eleven mandibular first and second molars were included in this study. Sampleswere divided according to age, gender, quadrant, and root length. Measurements of dentine thickness fromthe external border of the root canal to the external root surface and concavity depth were recorded 1, 2, and4 mm below the furcation level. Kruskal–Wallis and Wilcoxon rank sum tests were performed to estimate theinfluence of different variables, and a multiple regression analysis was performed to evaluate the influence ofdentine thickness below the furcation level.Results: First molars had a deeper concavity depth with significant differences in both 1 mm and 2 mm levels than second molars (P0.05). The distal concavity was significantly deeper in the 1 and 2 mm levels (P

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

OLIVIERI, J. G., DURAN-SINDREU, F. (2022). Root Dentine Thickness and Concavity Depth in Mandibular Molars: A Cone Beam Computed Tomography Population Study. European Endodontic Journal, Cilt: 3 - Sayı: 3, 160–166. https://ajindex.com/articles/510536

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (16)

  1. Kim SY, Kim BS, Woo J, Kim Y. Morphology of mandibular first molars analyzed by cone-beam computed tomography in a Korean population: variations in the number of roots and canals. J Endod 2013 Dec; 39(12):1516– 21
  2. Silva EJ, Nejaim Y, Silva AV, Haiter-Neto F, Cohenca N. Evaluation of root canal configuration of mandibular molars in a Brazilian population by using cone-beam computed tomography: an in vivo study. J Endod 2013; 39(7):849–52
  3. Fan B, Pan Y, Gao Y, Fang F, Wu Q, Gutmann JL. Three-dimensional morphologic analysis of isthmuses in the mesial roots of mandibular molars. J Endod 2010; 36(11):1866–9
  4. Wayman BE, Patten JA, Dazey SE. Relative frequency of teeth needing endodontic treatment in 3350 consecutive endodontic patients. J Endod 1994; 20(8):399–401
  5. Kessler JR, Peters DD, Lorton L. Comparison of the relative risk of molar root perforations using various endodontic instrumentation techniques. J Endod 1983; 9(10):439–47
  6. Berutti E, Fedon G. Thickness of cementum/dentin in mesial roots of mandibular first molars. J Endod 1992; 18(11):545–8
  7. Lim SS, Stock CJ. The risk of perforation in the curved canal: anticurvature filing compared with the stepback technique. Int Endod J 1987; 20(1):33–9
  8. Isom TL, Marshall JG, Baumgartner JC. Evaluation of root thickness in curved canals after flaring. J Endod 1995; 21(7):368–71
  9. Abou-Rass M, Frank AL, Glick DH. The anticurvature filing method to prepare the curved root canal. J Am Dent Assoc 1980; 101(5):792–4
  10. Bower RC. Furcation morphology relative to periodontal treatment. Furcation root surface anatomy. J Periodontol 1979; 50(7):366–74
  11. Garcia Filho PF, Letra A, Menezes R, Carmo AM. Danger zone in mandibular molars before instrumentation: an in vitro study. J Appl Oral Sci 2003; 11(4):324–6
  12. Peters OA, Laib A, Göhring TN, Barbakow F. Changes in root canal geometry after preparation assessed by high-resolution computed tomography. J Endod 2001; 27(1):1–6
  13. Dwivedi S, Dwivedi CD, Mittal N. Correlation of root dentin thickness and length of roots in mesial roots of mandibular molars. J Endod 2014; 40(9):1435–8
  14. Sauáia TS, Gomes BP, Pinheiro ET, Zaia AA, Ferraz CC, Souza-Filho FJ, et al. Thickness of dentine in mesial roots of mandibular molars with different lengths. Int Endod J 2010; 43(7):555–9
  15. Schilder H. Cleaning and shaping the root canal. Dent Clin North Am 1974; 18(2):269–96
  16. Assif D, Gorfil C. Biomechanical considerations in restoring endodontically