Dergiler / European Archives of Medical Research / 2019 / Cilt: 35 - Sayı: 4

Comparison of the Effects of Lidocaine and Dexmedetomidine Before Propofol Induction During Laryngeal Mask Airway Insertion

Sayfa
205–210
Yayın Tarihi
2022-10-12
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Furthermore, the use of lidocainebefore propofol induction provides better hemodynamic control than dexmedetomidine.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Objective: Laryngeal mask (LMA) is an airway device that can be used as an alternative to face mask and tracheal intubation.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Patients were randomly dividedinto two groups: Group L (those who received 1.5 mg/kg lidocaine) and Group D (those who received 1 μg/kg dexmedetomidine).
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Furthermore, the use of lidocainebefore propofol induction provides better hemodynamic control than dexmedetomidine.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

Objective: Laryngeal mask (LMA) is an airway device that can be used as an alternative to face mask and tracheal intubation. Different drug combinations can beused to ensure suitable conditions during LMA insertion. Lidocaine and dexmedetomidine are drugs that can be used to reduce hemodynamic response and suppressoropharyngeal reflexes during both intubation and LMA insertion. The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of lidocaine and dexmedetomidine on LMAinsertion.Methods: Sixty patients who were scheduled to undergo cystoscopy under general anesthesia with LMA were included in the study. Patients were randomly dividedinto two groups: Group L (those who received 1.5 mg/kg lidocaine) and Group D (those who received 1 μg/kg dexmedetomidine). Number of attempts of LMA insertion,ease of LMA insertion, mouth opening, laryngospasm, gumming, stomach distention, limb movements and spontaneous breathing and hemodynamic parameterswere recorded.Results: There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups in terms of the number of attempts of LMA insertion. In the first attempt, the LMAinsertion success rate was 70% for Group L and 73.3% for Group D. There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups in terms of mouth opening,laryngospasm, ease of LMA insertion, gumming, stomach distension, limb movement and spontaneous breathing. Systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure,mean blood pressure and heart rate were statistically lower in Group D after drug administration. It was determined that the decreases in the other times werestatistically significant compared to the baseline values after drug administration in both groups.Conclusion: Based on the results of the present study, 1 μg/kg dexmedetomidine and 1.5 mg/kg lidocaine used before propofol induction provided similar conditionsfor LMA insertion. Dexmedetomidine has a more hypotensive effect and provides a greater reduction in heart rate than lidocaine. Furthermore, the use of lidocainebefore propofol induction provides better hemodynamic control than dexmedetomidine.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

KİTAPÇIOĞLU, D., KAVAKLI, A. S. (2022). Comparison of the Effects of Lidocaine and Dexmedetomidine Before Propofol Induction During Laryngeal Mask Airway Insertion. European Archives of Medical Research, Cilt: 35 - Sayı: 4, 205–210. https://ajindex.com/articles/510434

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (14)

  1. Wilkins CJ, Cramp PG, Staples J, Stevens WC. Comparison of the anesthetic requirement for tolerance of laryngeal mask airway and endotracheal tube. Anesth Analg 1992;75:794-7
  2. Brown GW, Patel N, Ellis FR. Comparison of propofol and thiopentone for laryngeal mask insertion. Anaesthesia 1991;46:771-2
  3. Scanlon P, Carey M, Power M, Kirby F. Patient response to laryngeal mask insertion after induction of anaesthesia with propofol or thiopentone. Can J Anaesth 1993;40:816-8
  4. Goh PK, Chiu CL, Wang CY, Chan YK, Loo PL. Randomized double-blind comparison of ketamine-propofol, fentanyl-propofol and propofol-saline on haemodynamics and laryngeal mask airway insertion conditions. Anaesth Intensive Care 2005;33:223-8
  5. Siddik-Sayyid SM, Aouad MT, Taha SK, Daaboul DG, Deeb PG, Massouh FM, et al. A comparison of sevoflurane-propofol versus sevoflurane or propofol for laryngeal mask airway insertion in adults. Anesth Analg 2005;100:1204-9
  6. Lee MC, Absalom AR, Menon DK, Smith HL. Awake insertion of the laryngeal mask airway using topical lidocaine and intravenous remifentanil. Anaesthesia 2006;61:32-5
  7. Erb TO, von Ungern-Sternberg BS, Keller K, Frei FJ. The effect of intravenous lidocaine on laryngeal and respiratory reflex responses in anaesthetised children*. Anaesthesia 2013;68:13-20
  8. Koc C, Kocaman F, Aygenc E, Ozdem C, Cekic A. The use of preoperative lidocaine to prevent stridor and laryngospasm after tonsillectomy and adenoidectomy. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1998;118:880-2
  9. Guler G, Akin A, Tosun Z, Eskitascoglu E, Mizrak A, Boyaci A. Single-dose dexmedetomidine attenuates airway and circulatory reflexes during extubation. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2005;49:1088-91
  10. Maroof M, Khan RM, Jain D, Ashraf M. Dexmedetomidine is a useful adjunct for awake intubation. Can J Anaesth 2005;52:776-7
  11. Uzumcugil F, Canbay O, Celebi N, Karagoz AH, Ozgen S. Comparison of dexmedetomidine-propofol vs. fentanyl-propofol for laryngeal mask insertion. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2008;25:675-80
  12. Wei L, Deng X, Sui J, Wang L, Liu J. Dexmedetomidine Improves Intubating Conditions Without Muscle Relaxants in Children After Induction With Propofol and Remifentanil. Anesth Analg 2015;121:785-90
  13. Rashmi HD, Komala HK. Clinical evaluation of the effect of intravenous dexmedetomidine on the hemodynamic response to laryngoscopy and endotracheal intubation in patients undergoing thyroid surgeries. Anesth Essays Res 2016;10:483-7
  14. Nellore SS, Waychal AD, Rustagi PS