KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / European Archives of Medical Research / 2021 / Cilt: 37 - Sayı: 2

Correlation of Risk Factor of Pressure Ulcer Using the Braden RiskAssessment Scale

Tarkan MINGIR
Nagihan DURAN YAKAR
Namigar TURGUT
Nihan ALTINTEPE
İbrahim GÜN
Serap KARACALAR
Cansu BERKTTAŞ KILINÇ
Mehmet ZİNCİRCİ
Sayfa
83–88
Yayın Tarihi
2022-10-12
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

It is inferred from our study that these symptoms and standard laboratory results should be used as additional indicators in determining the risk of PU, and BRAS should be modified by considering these risk factors.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Objective: Pressure ulcers (PUs) are a common problem in intensive care units (ICUs) and lead to prolonged hospital stay and increased mortality and treatment cost.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:However, in recent years, it has been suggested that BRAS is insufficient.This study aimed to investigate the correlation between BRAS and risk factors of PU in patients treated in the ICU.Methods: This retrospective, single-center study was conducted between February and July 2017 and enrolled 200 patients with standardized PaO2/FiO2 ratio and BRAS scores, and all possible risk factors including age, sex, serum hemoglobin (Hb), albumin, bilirubin, creatinine, platelet, mechanical ventilation support, Glasgow Coma scale (GCS) scores, Nutritional Risk Screening (NRS2002) scores, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) 2 scores, hypotension, and expected mortality were evaluated.Results: The ages of the patients included the study were between 18 and 95 years, with a mean age of 62.84±17.98 years [88 (44%) women and 112 (56%) men].
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:It is inferred from our study that these symptoms and standard laboratory results should be used as additional indicators in determining the risk of PU, and BRAS should be modified by considering these risk factors.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:2017 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

Objective: Pressure ulcers (PUs) are a common problem in intensive care units (ICUs) and lead to prolonged hospital stay and increased mortality and treatment cost. The Norton and Braden Risk Assessment scales (BRAS) were developed for this purpose. However, in recent years, it has been suggested that BRAS is insufficient.This study aimed to investigate the correlation between BRAS and risk factors of PU in patients treated in the ICU.Methods: This retrospective, single-center study was conducted between February and July 2017 and enrolled 200 patients with standardized PaO2/FiO2 ratio and BRAS scores, and all possible risk factors including age, sex, serum hemoglobin (Hb), albumin, bilirubin, creatinine, platelet, mechanical ventilation support, Glasgow Coma scale (GCS) scores, Nutritional Risk Screening (NRS2002) scores, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) 2 scores, hypotension, and expected mortality were evaluated.Results: The ages of the patients included the study were between 18 and 95 years, with a mean age of 62.84±17.98 years [88 (44%) women and 112 (56%) men]. A positive correlation was noted between BRAS measurements and albumin, Hb, GCS, hypotension, and PaO2/FiO2measurements. Also, a negative correlation was noted between BRAS measurements and NRS2002 values, direct bilirubin levels, APACHE 2, and expected mortality values.Conclusion: Low albumin and Hb values, GCS, and PaO2/FiO2 values, hypotension, and high indirect bilirubin levels, NRS2002, and APACHE 2 scores are risk factors for developing PU. It is inferred from our study that these symptoms and standard laboratory results should be used as additional indicators in determining the risk of PU, and BRAS should be modified by considering these risk factors.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

MINGIR, T., YAKAR, N. D., TURGUT, N., ALTINTEPE, N., GÜN, İ., KARACALAR, S., KILINÇ, C. B., ZİNCİRCİ, M. (2022). Correlation of Risk Factor of Pressure Ulcer Using the Braden RiskAssessment Scale. European Archives of Medical Research, Cilt: 37 - Sayı: 2, 83–88. https://ajindex.com/articles/510345

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (16)

  1. European Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel and National Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel. Treatment of pressure ulcers: Quick Reference Guide [online] 2009
  2. Toptas M, Sengul Samanci N, Akkoc İ, Yucetas E, Cebeci E, Sen O, et al. Factors Affecting the Length of Stay in the Intensive Care Unit: Our Clinical Experience. Biomed Res Int 2018;2018:943046
  3. Sivrioğlu K, Özcan O. Basınç Ülserleri. Ed: Özcan O, Arpacıoğlu O, Turan B. Nörorehabilitasyon, Bursa; 2000. p.276-91
  4. Turgut N, Ak A, Ak E, Yakar N, Yakar N, Yılmaz B, et al. Incidence, Prevention and Treatment of Pressure Ulcers in Intensive Care Patients. J Turk Soc Intensive 2017;15:72-6
  5. Chen HL, Cao YJ, Wang J, Huai BS. Calibration power of the Braden scale in predicting pressure ulcer development. J Wound Care 2016;25:655-9
  6. Serpa LF, Santos VL. Validity of the Braden Nutrition Subscale in predicting pressure ulcer development. J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs 2014;41:436-43
  7. Hyun S, Vermillion B, Newton C, Fall M, Li X, Kaewprag P, et al. Predictive validity of the Braden scale for patients in intensive care units. Am J Crit Care 2013;22:514-20
  8. Pınar R, Oğuz S. Norton ve Braden Bası Yarası Değerlendirme Ölçeklerinin Yatağa Bağımlı Aynı Hasta Grubunda Güvenirlik ve Geçerliğinin Sınanması: Uluslararası Katılımlı VI. Ulusal Hemşirelik Kongresi, Kongre Kitabı, Ankara; 1998.p.172-5
  9. Fırat Kılıç H, Sucu Dağ G. The scales frequently used in the assessment of pressure sores. JAREN 2017;3:49-54
  10. Bergstrom N, Braden BJ, Laguzza A, Holman V. The Braden Scale for Predicting Pressure Sore Risk. Nurs Res 1987;36:205-10
  11. Stoelting J, McKenna L, Taggart E, Mottar R, Jeffers BR, Wendler MC. Prevention of nosocomial pressure ulcers: a process improvement project. J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs 2007;34:382-8
  12. Karadağ A. Basınç ülserleri: Değerlendirme, önleme ve tedavi. C.Ü. Hemşirelik Yüksek Okulu 2003;7:41-8
  13. Balzer K, Pohl C, Dassen T, Halfens R. The Norton, Waterlow, Braden, and Care Dependency Scales: comparing their validity when identifying patients’ pressure sore risk. J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs 2007;34:389-98
  14. Kottner J, Dassen T, Tannen A. Inter- and intrarater reliability of the Waterlow pressure sore risk scale: a systematic review. Int J Nurs Stud 2009;46:369-79
  15. Fernandes LM, Caliri MH. Using the Braden and Glasgow scales to predict pressure ulcer risk in patients hospitalized at intensive care units. Rev Lat Am Enfermagem 2008;16:973-8
  16. Kottner J, Dassen T.