Dergiler / European Archives of Medical Research / 2021 / Cilt: 37 - Sayı: 4

Effect of Pretreatment with Cilostazol on Spinal Cord Ischemia-reperfusion Injury in Rats

Sayfa
229–235
Yayın Tarihi
2022-10-12
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Conclusion: These results suggest that pre-ischemia cilostazol treatment has a protective effect against ischemia/reperfusion-induced spinal cord injury.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Objective: Following the aortic aneurysm repair surgery, ischemic spinal cord injury is a substantial complication which may lead to paraplegia.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:This study aims to explore the protective effect of cilostazol, which is a phosphodiesterase type-3 inhibitor, against ischemic/ reperfusion-induced spinal cord injury that is experimentally forged in medulla spinalis of rats.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Conclusion: These results suggest that pre-ischemia cilostazol treatment has a protective effect against ischemia/reperfusion-induced spinal cord injury.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

Objective: Following the aortic aneurysm repair surgery, ischemic spinal cord injury is a substantial complication which may lead to paraplegia. This study aims to explore the protective effect of cilostazol, which is a phosphodiesterase type-3 inhibitor, against ischemic/ reperfusion-induced spinal cord injury that is experimentally forged in medulla spinalis of rats. Methods: A total of 24 rats were separated into three workgroups. The control group (n=8); the ischemic group (n=8), in which aortic clamping was performed without cilostazol administration; and finally the cilostazol-adminsistered group (n=8). Each mouse was subjected to induced ischemia for 45 min by clamping of the abdominal aorta. Afterwards, blood build up was provided by de-clamping. Serial assessments of motor and sensory functions of all rats were performed prior to the operation and, at 24 and 48 h of reperfusion, using the Tarlov and LeMay scores. Later on, spinal cord tissues were collected for histopathologic examination. Results: Tarlov scores at postoperative hours 24 and 48 tend to be significantly higher in the cilostazol-treated group than in the non-treated ischemia group (3.13±0.64 versus 1.25±0.71, p=0.0029 for the 24th hour; 2.75±0.71 versus 0.38±0.52, p=0.0016 for the 48th hour). LeMay scores at postoperative hours 24 and 48 were as well significantly higher in the cilostazol-treated group than in the non-treated ischemia group (9.13±1.13 versus 4.50±0.76, p=0.0018 for the 24th hour; 9.00±1.20 versus 3.75±0.89, p=0.0018 for the 48th hour). Histologic outcomes were strongly correlated to the neurologic outcomes. Conclusion: These results suggest that pre-ischemia cilostazol treatment has a protective effect against ischemia/reperfusion-induced spinal cord injury.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

KULAÇOĞLU, Ü. K., KALKO, Y., ŞAHİN, G. E. (2022). Effect of Pretreatment with Cilostazol on Spinal Cord Ischemia-reperfusion Injury in Rats. European Archives of Medical Research, Cilt: 37 - Sayı: 4, 229–235. https://ajindex.com/articles/510319

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (15)

  1. Gilling-Smith GL, Worswick L, Knight PF, Wolfe JH, Mansfield AO. Surgical repair of thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm: 10 years’ experience. Br J Surg 1995;82:624-9
  2. Lintott P, Hafez HM, Stansby G. Spinal cord complications of thoracoabdominal aneurysm surgery. Br J Surg 1998;85:5-15
  3. Mauney MC, Blackbourne LH, Langenburg SE, Buchanan SA, Kron IL, Tribble CG. Prevention of spinal cord injury after repair of the thoracic or thoracoabdominal aorta. Ann Thorac Surg 1995;59:245-52
  4. Jaeschke H. Preservation injury: mechanisms, prevention and consequences. J Hepatol. 1996;25:774-80
  5. Kimura Y, Tani T, Kanbe T, Watanabe K. Effect of cilostazol on platelet aggregation and experimental thrombosis. Arzneimittelforschung 1985;35:1144-9
  6. Matsumoto M. Cilostazol in secondary prevention of stroke: impact of the cilostazol stroke prevention study. Atheroscler Suppl 2005;6:33-40
  7. Douglas JS Jr, Holmes DR Jr, Kereiakes DJ, Grines CL, Block E, Ghazzal ZM, et al. Coronary stent restenosis in patients treated with cilostazol. Circulation 2005;112:2826-32
  8. Tarlov IM, Klinger H. Spinal cord compression studies. II. Time limits for recovery after acute compression in dogs. AMA Arch Neurol Psychiatry 1954;71:271-90
  9. LeMay DR, Neal S, Neal S, Zelenock GB, D’Alecy LG. Paraplegia in the rat induced by aortic cross-clamping: model characterization and glucose exacerbation of neurologic deficit. J Vasc Surg 1987;6:383-90
  10. Genovese T, Cuzzocrea S. Role of free radicals and poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase-1 in the development of spinal cord injury: new potential therapeutic targets. Curr Med Chem 2008;15:477-87
  11. Christie SD, Comeau B, Myers T, Sadi D, Purdy M, Mendez I. Duration of lipid peroxidation after acute spinal cord injury in rats and the effect of methylprednisolone. Neurosurg Focus 2008;25:E5
  12. Kamencic H, Griebel RW, Lyon AW, Paterson PG, Juurlink BH. Promoting glutathione synthesis after spinal cord trauma decreases secondary damage and promotes retention of function. FASEB J 2001;15:243-50
  13. Kaptanoglu E, Solaroglu I, Okutan O, Surucu HS, Akbiyik F, Beskonakli E. Erythropoietin exerts neuroprotection after acute spinal cord injury in rats: effect on lipid peroxidation and early ultrastructural findings. Neurosurg Rev 2004;27:113-20
  14. Diaz-Ruiz A, Rios C, Duarte I, Correa D, Guizar-Sahagun G, Grijalva I, et al. Lipid peroxidation inhibition in spinal cord injury: cyclosporin-A vs methylprednisolone. Neuroreport 2000;11:1765-7
  15. Kochha