Dergiler / European Archives of Medical Research / 2022 / Cilt: 38 - Sayı: 2

Aflibercept in a Persistent Diabetic Macular Edema Refractory to Previous Ranibizumab Therapy

Sayfa
90–95
Yayın Tarihi
2022-10-12
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Although the BCVA increased and the IOP decreased, these changes were not statistically significant.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Objective: To investigate the visual acuity and anatomical outcomes of intravitreal aflibercept treatment in patients with diabetic macular edema (DME) who were unresponsive to ranibizumab.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Methods: Patients with refractory DME treated with at least 3 consecutive injections of ranibizumab, 4-6 weeks apart, before switch and with at least 2 aflibercept injections after that in the period of May 2013 to October 2017 were considered eligible for study participation. “The patients” demographic characteristics, best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), and central foveal thickness (CFT) were recorded at baseline, preswitch, the first month post-switch, and the final visit.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Although the BCVA increased and the IOP decreased, these changes were not statistically significant.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:2013 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

Objective: To investigate the visual acuity and anatomical outcomes of intravitreal aflibercept treatment in patients with diabetic macular edema (DME) who were unresponsive to ranibizumab. Methods: Patients with refractory DME treated with at least 3 consecutive injections of ranibizumab, 4-6 weeks apart, before switch and with at least 2 aflibercept injections after that in the period of May 2013 to October 2017 were considered eligible for study participation. “The patients” demographic characteristics, best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), and central foveal thickness (CFT) were recorded at baseline, preswitch, the first month post-switch, and the final visit. Results: A total of 33 eyes of 28 patients were investigated. The average number of ranibizumab injections before switching to aflibercept was 4.97±1.94 and that of the subsequent aflibercept injections was 2.54±0.6. The mean baseline BCVA was 0.56 ± 0.38 logMAR. After the switch, the BCVA during the first and final visits was 0.41±0.34 logMAR (p=0.19) and 0.36±0.34 (p=0.16), respectively. After switching, clinical follow-up data for at least 6 months were available for all eyes. The mean baseline CFT was 504±123.7 μm (264-844 μm).One month after the switch, the average CFT had significantly reduced to 338.8±105.3 μm (225-615 μm) (p=0.0001). At the final visit, the average CFT was 345.7±137.4 μm (136-892 μm) (p=0.0002). Before and after the switch, the mean intraocular pressure (IOP) was 14.18±3.66 mmHg and 13.54±3.81 mmHg respectively (p=0.46). Conclusion: Switch to aflibercept from ranibizumab in patients with recalcitrant DME resulted in significant anatomical improvements. Although the BCVA increased and the IOP decreased, these changes were not statistically significant.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

AYDEMİR, G. A., ÜNLÜ, N., ÖRNEK, F., HAZIROLAN, D., ACAR, M. A., ÖZKAN, G. Ü. (2022). Aflibercept in a Persistent Diabetic Macular Edema Refractory to Previous Ranibizumab Therapy. European Archives of Medical Research, Cilt: 38 - Sayı: 2, 90–95. https://ajindex.com/articles/510270

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (12)

  1. Romero-Aroca P. Managing diabetic macular edema: the leading cause of diabetes blindness. World J Diabetes 2011;2:98-104
  2. Funatsu H, Yamashita H, Sakata K, Noma H, Mimura T, Suzuki M, et al. Vitreous levels of vascular endothelial growth factor and intercellular adhesion molecule 1 are related to diabetic macular edema. Ophthalmology 2005;112:806-16
  3. Nguyen QD, Brown DM, Marcus DM, Boyer DS, Patel S, Feiner L, et al. Ranibizumab for diabetic macular edema: results from 2 phase III randomized trials: RISE and RIDE. Ophthalmology 2012;119:789-801
  4. Schmidt-Erfurth U, Lang GE, Holz FG, Schlingemann RO, Lanzetta P, Massin P, et al. Three-year outcomes of individualized ranibizumab treatment in patients with diabetic macular edema: the RESTORE extension study. Ophthalmology 2014;121:1045-53
  5. Rajendram R, Fraser-Bell S, Kaines A, Michaelides M, Hamilton RD, Esposti SD, et al. A 2-year prospective randomized controlled trial of intravitreal bevacizumab or laser therapy (BOLT) in the management of diabetic macular edema: 24-month data: report 3. Arch Ophthalmol 2012;130:972-9
  6. Sivaprasad S, Browning RC, Starita C. An open-label, one-year, noncomparative study to evaluate the safety and tolerability of intravitreal pegaptanib sodium in patients with diabetic macular edema. Clin Ophthalmol 2014;8:1565-71
  7. Brown DM, Schmidt-Erfurth U, Do DV, Holz FG, Boyer DS, Midena E, et al. Intravitreal aflibercept for diabetic macular edema: 100-week results from the VISTA and VIVID studies. Ophthalmology 2015;122:2044-52
  8. Diabetic Retinopathy Clinical Research Network, Wells JA, Glassman AR, Ayala AR, Jampol LM, Aiello LP, et al. Aflibercept, bevacizumab, or ranibizumab for diabetic macular edema. N Engl J Med 2015;372:1193- 203
  9. Holash J, Davis S, Papadopoulos N, Croll SD, Ho L, Russell M, et al. VEGFtrap: a VEGF blocker with potent antitumor effects. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2002;99:11393-8
  10. Papadopoulos N, Martin J, Ruan Q, Rafique A, Rosconi MP, Shi E, et al. Binding and neutralization of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and related ligands by VEGF trap, ranibizumab and bevacizumab. Angiogenesis 2012;15:171-85
  11. Hussain RM, Ciulla TA. Treatment strategies for refractory diabetic macular edema: switching anti-VEGF treatments, adopting corticosteroid-based treatments, and combination therapy. Expert Opin Biol Ther 2016;16:365-74
  12. Mukkamala L, Bhagat N, Zarbin M. Practical lessons from protocol T for the management of diabetic macul