KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Eurasian Journal of Pulmonology / 2016 / Cilt: 18 - Sayı: 3

Determining The Pressure Combination During Mechanical Ventilation that is Best Compatible with the Rapid Shallow Breathing Index Calculated in Spontaneous Ventilation

Şenay YILMAZ
Gül GÜRSEL
Müge AYDOĞDU
Sayfa
127–132
Yayın Tarihi
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Respiration rate (f ) was higher in failure than in the success group in PSV 0 cm H2O/PEEP 5 cm H2O and PSV 5 cm H2O/PEEP 0 cm H2O (p=0.030, p=0.030, respectively). f

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Objective: The rapid shallow breathing index (RSBI) is relatively the best predictive parameter for initial assessment of readiness for the discontinuation of mechanical ventilation (MV) support.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:RSBI and other weaning parameters were calculated in different combinations (pressure support ventilation (PSV) 5 cm HO / positive-end expiratory pressure (PEEP) 5 cm H2O; PSV 0 cm H2O/PEEP 5 cm H2O; PSV 5 cm H2O/PEEP 0 cm H2O; PSV 0 cm H2O/PEEP 0 cm H2O) before T-tube trial in all patients.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Respiration rate (f ) was higher in failure than in the success group in PSV 0 cm H2O/PEEP 5 cm H2O and PSV 5 cm H2O/PEEP 0 cm H2O (p=0.030, p=0.030, respectively). f
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

Objective: The rapid shallow breathing index (RSBI) is relatively the best predictive parameter for initial assessment of readiness for the discontinuation of mechanical ventilation (MV) support. In this study, we aimed to determine the best pressure combinations that can predict successful RSBI closest to the values calculated in spontaneous ventilation (SV).Methods: Twenty-five mechanically ventilated patients were enrolled in the study. RSBI and other weaning parameters were calculated in different combinations (pressure support ventilation (PSV) 5 cm HO / positive-end expiratory pressure (PEEP) 5 cm H2O; PSV 0 cm H2O/PEEP 5 cm H2O; PSV 5 cm H2O/PEEP 0 cm H2O; PSV 0 cm H2O/PEEP 0 cm H2O) before T-tube trial in all patients. Results: The mean age of the patients was 73±10 years. RSBI did not differ significantly between SV and other combinations. The best correlation with SV was found with 5 cm H2O PSV-0 cm H2O PEEP (p=0.0001, r=0.719) and the worst with 0 cm H2O PSV-5 cm H2O PEEP. RSBI showed no predictive value for weaning success. Respiration rate (f ) was higher in failure than in the success group in PSV 0 cm H2O/PEEP 5 cm H2O and PSV 5 cm H2O/PEEP 0 cm H2O (p=0.030, p=0.030, respectively). f

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

YILMAZ, Ş., GÜRSEL, G., AYDOĞDU, M. (2022). Determining The Pressure Combination During Mechanical Ventilation that is Best Compatible with the Rapid Shallow Breathing Index Calculated in Spontaneous Ventilation. Eurasian Journal of Pulmonology, Cilt: 18 - Sayı: 3, 127–132. https://ajindex.com/articles/509733

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (2)

  1. MacIntyre NR, Cook DJ, Ely EW, Epstein SK, Fink JB, Heffner JE, et al. Evi- dence based guidelines for weaning and discontinuing ventilatory sup- port. Chest 2001; 120: 375S-95S. [CrossRef] Meade M, Guyatt G, Cook D, Griffith L, Sinuff T, Kergl C, et al. Predicting success in weaning from mechanical ventilation. Chest 2001; 120: 400- 24. [CrossRef] Yang KL, Tobin MJ. A prospective study of indexes predicting the out- come of trials of weaning from mechanical ventilation. N Eng J Med 1991; 21: 1445-51. [CrossRef] Johanigman JA, Davis K Jr, Campbell RS, Branson RD, Luchette FA, Hurst JM. Use of the rapid/shallow breathing index as an indicator of patient work of breathing during pressure support ventilation. Surgery 1997: 737-40. [CrossRef] Ely EW, Baker AM, Evans GW, Haponik EF. The prognostic significance of passing a daily screening of weaning parameters. Intensive Care Med 1999; 25: 581-7. [CrossRef] Ely EW, Bennett PA, Bowton DL, Murphy SM, Florance AM, Haponik EF. Large scale implementation of a respiratory therapist driven protocol for ventilator weaning. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1999; 159: 439-46. [CrossRef] Esteban A, Alia I, Gordo F, Fernandez R, Solsona JF, Valverdu I, et al. Ex- tubation outcome after spontanous breathing trials with t-tube or pres- sure support ventilation: The Splanish Lung Failure Colloborative Group. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1997; 156: 459-65. [CrossRef] Boles JM, Bion J, Connors A, Herridge M, Marsh B, Melot C, et al. Weaning from mechanical ventilation. Eur Respir J 2007; 29: 1033-56. [CrossRef] Chao DC, Scheinhorn DJ. Determining the best thereshold of rapid breathing index in a therapist-implemented patient-specific weaning protocol. Respir Care 2007; 52: 159-65.
  2. Kuo PH, Wu HD, Lu BY, Chen MT, Kuo SH, Yang PC. Predictive value of rapid shallow breathing index measured at initiation and termination of a 2-hour spontaneous breathing trial for weaning outcome in ICU pa- tients. J Formos Med Assoc 2006; 105: 390-8. [CrossRef] Esteban A, Alia I, Ibanez J, Benito S, Tobin MJ. Modes of mechanical ven- tilation and weaning: a national survey of Spanish hospitals; The Spanish Lung Failure Collabarative Group. Chest 1994; 106: 1188-93. [CrossRef] Gursel G, Demirtas S. Value of APACHE II, SOFA and CPIS scores in predict- ing prognosis in patients with ventilator-associated pneumonia. Respira- tion 2006; 73: 503-8. [CrossRef] Gursel G. Determinants of the length of mechanical ventilation in patients with COPD in the intensive care