Dergiler / Eurasian Journal of Medicine / 2020 / Cilt: 52 - Sayı: 2

aniSerological Investigation of Occupational Exposure to Zoonotic Crimean-Congo Hemorrhagic Fever Infection

Sayfa
132–135
Yayın Tarihi
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Thus, these participants must take necessary measures to protect themselves from CCHF and should be trained by health authorities.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Objective: Crimean-Congo hemorrhagic fever (CCHF) is an acute and highly fatal disease.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:The study population was composed of 72 participants having direct contact with animals and 19 blood donors who were not in direct contact with animals.Results: The overall rate of CCHF immunoglobulin G positivity in risk groups was found to be 6.94% (5/72).
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Thus, these participants must take necessary measures to protect themselves from CCHF and should be trained by health authorities.
🔬Tür:Uygulamalı Anket & Alan Araştırması
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

Objective: Crimean-Congo hemorrhagic fever (CCHF) is an acute and highly fatal disease. In this study, our aim was to compare and evaluate the prevalence of CCHF virus (CCHFV) antibody among occupational high-risk groups by using the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and draw attention to the occupational groups that are at high risk for CCHF infection in an endemic region for this zoonotic infection in Erzurum, Turkey.Materials and Methods: The antibody levels against CCHFV were surveyed among slaughterhouse workers, animal breeders, and veterinarians. The study population was composed of 72 participants having direct contact with animals and 19 blood donors who were not in direct contact with animals.Results: The overall rate of CCHF immunoglobulin G positivity in risk groups was found to be 6.94% (5/72). CCHFV antibodies were found in 4 (12.5%) individuals of the animal breeder group. This ratio was considered significantly higher compared with the healthy control group. CCHFV antibodies were found in only one person (4.0%) who was an abattoir worker. In the veterinarian group, all people were found negative.Conclusion: In our study, the variables showing important associations with the prevalence of anti-CCHFV antibodies were livestock breeding, rural areas, and age. It was concluded that our region is endemic with regard to CCHF infection and persons who had direct contact with animals are at high risk. Thus, these participants must take necessary measures to protect themselves from CCHF and should be trained by health authorities.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

SÖZDUTMAZ, İ., KARAMEŞE, M., TİMURKAN, M. Ö., AYDIN, H., ÖZMEN, E., UYANIK, M. H., GÜLEN, A., AKTAŞ, O. (2022). aniSerological Investigation of Occupational Exposure to Zoonotic Crimean-Congo Hemorrhagic Fever Infection. Eurasian Journal of Medicine, Cilt: 52 - Sayı: 2, 132–135. https://ajindex.com/articles/508910

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (15)

  1. Sharifi-Mood B, Metanat M, Alavi-Naini R. Prevalence of crimean-congo hemorrhagic Fever among high risk human groups. Int J High Risk Behav Addict 2014
  2. e11520. [Crossref] 2. Kalaycioglu AT. Present and Future Implications of Crimean Congo Haemorrhagic Fever Disease Emergence in Turkey. Kafkas Univ Vet Fak Derg 2019
  3. 21981. 3. Leblebicioglu H, Ozaras R, Irmak H, et al. Crimean-Congo hemorrhagic fever in Turkey: Current status andfuture challenges. Antiviral Res 2016
  4. [Crossref] 4. Uyar Y, Christova I, Papa A. Current situation of Crimean Congo hemorrhagic fever (CCHF) in Anatolia and Balkan Peninsula. Turk Hij Den Biyol Derg 2011
  5. [Crossref] 5. Chinikar S, Moghadam AH, Parizadeh SJ, et al. Seroepidemiology of crimean congo hemorrhagic Fever in slaughterhouse workers in north eastern iran. Iran J Public Health 2012
  6. Mustafavi E, Pourhossein B, Esmaeili S, et al. Seroepidemiology and risk factors of Crimean-Congo Hemorrhagic Fever among butchers and slaughterhouse workers in southeastern Iran. Int J Infect Dis 2017
  7. [Crossref] 7. Sisman A. Epidemiologic Features and Risk Factors of Crimean-Congo Hemorrhagic Fever in Samsun Province, Turkey. J Epidemiol 2013
  8. [Crossref] 8. Sekercioglu CH. Guineafowl, ticks and Crimean-Congo hemorrhagic fever in Turkey: the perfect storm? Trends Parasitol 2013
  9. [Crossref] 9. Ergonul O, Zeller H, Celikbas A, et al. The lack of Crimean-Congo hemorrhagic fever virus antibodies in healthcare workers in an endemic region. Int J Infect Dis 2007
  10. [Crossref] 10. Mazzola LT, Kelly-cirino C. Diagnostic tests for Crimean-Congo haemorrhagic fever: a widespread tickborne disease. BMJ Glob Health 2019
  11. e001114. [Crossref] 11. Yilmaz GR, Buzgan T, Torunoglu MA, et al. A preliminary report on Crimean-Congo haemorrhagic fever in Turkey, March - June 2008. Euro Surveill 2008
  12. pii: 18953. [Crossref] 12. Ertugrul B, Kirdar S, Ersoy OS, et al. The seroprevalence of Crimean-Congo haemorrhagic fever among inhabitants living in the endemic regions of Western Anatolia. Scand J Infect Dis 2012
  13. [Crossref] 13. Kalvatchev N, Christova I. Current state of Crimean-Congo hemorrhagic fever in Bulgaria. Biotechnol Biotechnol Equip 2012
  14. [Crossref] 14. Karti SS, Odabasi Z, Korten V, et al. Crimean-Congo hemorrhagic fever in Turkey. Emerg Infect Dis 2004
  15. [Crossref] 15. Yagci-Caglayik D, Korukluoglu G, Uyar Y. Seroprevalence and risk