Dergiler / Eurasian Journal of Medicine / 2022 / Cilt: 54 - Sayı: 1

Multichannel Intraluminal Impedance and pH Monitoring are Complementary Methods in the Diagnosis of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease in Children

Sayfa
22–26
Yayın Tarihi
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Conclusion: It was concluded that more reliable results were obtained when the 2 methods were used together in this study.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Objective: Gastroesophageal reflux is considered to be a disease when reflux of gastric contents causes troublesome symptoms in infants and children.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Materials and Methods: This prospective cross-sectional study consisted of pediatric patients aged between 1 month and 18 years old with symptoms suggestive of gastroesophageal reflux disease.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Conclusion: It was concluded that more reliable results were obtained when the 2 methods were used together in this study.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

Objective: Gastroesophageal reflux is considered to be a disease when reflux of gastric contents causes troublesome symptoms in infants and children. The aim of this study was to compare the diagnostic value of the multichannel intraluminal impedance monitoring and only pH monitoring in the diagnosis of gastroesophageal reflux disease in infants and children. Materials and Methods: This prospective cross-sectional study consisted of pediatric patients aged between 1 month and 18 years old with symptoms suggestive of gastroesophageal reflux disease. Patients were divided into 2 groups as younger than 24 months (group 1) and older than 24 months (group 2). Twentyfour hours multichannel intraluminal impedance-pH monitoring was performed on the patients. Results: This study included 50 pediatric patients. The mean age of the patients was 5.35 ± 4.92 years. In group 1, total reflux events were fewer than group 2 (P = .03) by pH monitoring. In group 1, the number of non-acid reflux events was higher than in group 2 and in group 2, the number of acidic reflux events was higher than group 1 (P = .04). Reflux was detected by multichannel intraluminal impedance-pH monitoring in 13 (40%) of 32 patients who were assessed as negative by pH monitoring. Conclusion: It was concluded that more reliable results were obtained when the 2 methods were used together in this study.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

ALTAY, D., ÖZKAN, T. B., ÖZGÜR, T., ŞAHİN, N. Ü. (2022). Multichannel Intraluminal Impedance and pH Monitoring are Complementary Methods in the Diagnosis of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease in Children. Eurasian Journal of Medicine, Cilt: 54 - Sayı: 1, 22–26. https://ajindex.com/articles/508788

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (1)

  1. Rosen R, Vandenplas Y, Singendonk M, et al. Pediatric gastroesophageal reflux clinical practise guidelines: joint recommendations of the North American Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition and the European Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2018;66(3):516-554. [CrossRef] 2. Leung AK, Hon KL. Gastroesophageal reflux in children: an updated review. Drugs Context. 2019;8:212591. [CrossRef] 3. Rossi P, Isoldi S, Mallardo S, et al. Combined multichannel intraluminal impedance and pH monitoring is helpful in managing children with suspected gastro-oesophageal reflux disease. Dig Liver Dis. 2018;50(9):910-915. [CrossRef] 4. Bongiovanni A, Parisi GF, Scuderi MG, et al. Gastroesophageal reflux and respiratory diseases: does a real link exist? Minerva Pediatr. 2019;71(6):515-523. [CrossRef] 5. Gonçalves ES, Assumpçao MS, Servidoni MFCP, Lomazi EA, Ribeiro JD. Multichannel intraluminal impedance-pH and psychometric properties in gastroesophageal reflux: systematic review. J Pediatr (Rio J). 2020;96(6):673-685. [CrossRef] 6. Wenzl TG, Benninga MA, Loots CM, Salvatore S, Vandenplas Y, ESPGHAN EURO-PIG Working Group. Indications, methodology and interpretation of combined esophageal impedance-pH monitoring in children: ESPGHAN EURO-PIG standard protocol. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2012;55(2):230-234. [CrossRef] 7. Safe M, Cho J, Krishnan U. Combined multichannel intraluminal impedance and pH measurement in detecting gastroesophageal reflux disease in children. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2016;63(5):e98-e106. [CrossRef] 8. Mangiavillano B, Passaretti S, Corsetti M, Mezzi G, Curioni S, Testoni PA. Esophageal 24-hour pH metry after esophageal manometry facilitated by a new medical device, a mini-evertube. Open Med Devices J. 2009;1(1):11-13. [CrossRef] 9. Francavilla R, Magistà AM, Bucci N, et al. Comparison of esophageal pH and multichannel intraluminal impedance testing in pediatric patients with suspected gastroesophageal reflux. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2010;50(2):154-160. [CrossRef] 10. Shay S, Richter J. Direct comparison of impedance, manometry and pH probe in detecting reflux before and after a meal. Dig Dis Sci. 2005;50(9):1584-1590. [CrossRef] 11. Karamanolis G, Kotsalidis G, Triantafyllou K, et al. Yield of combined impedance-pH monitoring for refractory reflux symptoms in clinical practice. J Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2011;17(2):158- 163. [Cros