Dergiler / Eurasian Journal of Medical Investigation / 2019 / Cilt: 3 - Sayı: 3

Discrepancies between Women’s Reports and Men’s Awareness of Sexual Harassment: A Study among Representatives to the Union Parishads in Bangladesh

Sayfa
196–204
Yayın Tarihi
2022-10-12
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Females reported victimisation from verbal sexual harassment to be the most common type, followed bynonverbal harassment, and sexual harassment based on social manipulation; the least common type was victimisationfrom physical sexual harassment.Conclusion: Great discrepancies were found between reports by females of victimisation from sexual harassment inthe Union Parishads and awareness of it by their male colleagues

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Objectives: The aim of the study was to investigate diffrences between reports of victimisation from sexual harassment by females and awareness of it among their male colleagues.Methods: A questionnaire was completed by 821 representatives, 412 females, 409 males, from the Union Parishads,the rural local governance bodies of Bangladesh.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Females 29−45years of age were signifiantly more victimised from all types of sexual harassment than those 51−61 years old.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Females reported victimisation from verbal sexual harassment to be the most common type, followed bynonverbal harassment, and sexual harassment based on social manipulation; the least common type was victimisationfrom physical sexual harassment.Conclusion: Great discrepancies were found between reports by females of victimisation from sexual harassment inthe Union Parishads and awareness of it by their male colleagues
🔬Tür:Uygulamalı Anket & Alan Araştırması
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

Objectives: The aim of the study was to investigate diffrences between reports of victimisation from sexual harassment by females and awareness of it among their male colleagues.Methods: A questionnaire was completed by 821 representatives, 412 females, 409 males, from the Union Parishads,the rural local governance bodies of Bangladesh. Sexual harassment was measured with the Sexual Harassment Experience Questionnaire, measuring diffrent types of sexual harassment.Results: For all types of sexual harassment, reports by females on how often they were victimised were signifiantlyhigher than reports by males about how often they had observed female colleagues being harassed. Females 29−45years of age were signifiantly more victimised from all types of sexual harassment than those 51−61 years old. Males56−61 years of age scored higher than other males on observations of female victimisation from all types of sexualharassment. Females reported victimisation from verbal sexual harassment to be the most common type, followed bynonverbal harassment, and sexual harassment based on social manipulation; the least common type was victimisationfrom physical sexual harassment.Conclusion: Great discrepancies were found between reports by females of victimisation from sexual harassment inthe Union Parishads and awareness of it by their male colleagues

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

TALUKDAR, I. H., ÖSTERMAN, K., BJÖRKQVİST, K. (2022). Discrepancies between Women’s Reports and Men’s Awareness of Sexual Harassment: A Study among Representatives to the Union Parishads in Bangladesh. Eurasian Journal of Medical Investigation, Cilt: 3 - Sayı: 3, 196–204. https://ajindex.com/articles/508760

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (9)

  1. US Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. Sexual harassment; 2019.
  2. Pryor JB, Giedd JL, Williams KB. 1995. A social psychological model for predicting sexual harassment. J Soc Issues 1995;51:69–84. [CrossRef] 3. Ahmed SI, Jackson SJ, Ahmed N, Ferdous HS, Rifat MR, Rizvi ASM, Mansur RS. Protibadi: A platform for fihting sexual harassment in urban Bangladesh. In Proceedings of the 32nd annual ACM conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems pp. 2695−704. Toronto, Canada; 2014, 29 April
  3. Culbertson AL, Rosenfeld P, Kewley SB, Magnusson P. Assessment of sexual harassment in the Navy: Results of the 1989 Navy-wide survey No. NPRDC-TR-92-11. 1992. Navy Personell Research and Development Center, San Diego, CA. [CrossRef] 5. Martindale M. Sexual harassment in the military: 1988. 1990. Arlington, VA: Defense Manpower Data Center
  4. Fitzgerald LF, Shullman SL, Bailey N, Richards M, Swecker J, Gold A, Ormerod AJ, Weitzman L. 1988. The incidence and dimensions of sexual harassment in academia and the workplace. J Vocat Behav 1988;32:152–75. [CrossRef] 7. Gutek BA. Sex and the workplace: The impact of sexual behavior and harassment on women, men, and organizations. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass; 1985
  5. Saunders BE. Sexual harassment of women in the workplace: Results from the National Women’s Study. Eighth Annual North Carolina/South Carolina Labor Law Seminar, Asheville, NC, USA; 1992
  6. Blau, FD. Trends in the well-being of American women, 1970–1995. J Econ Lit 1998;36:112–65. [CrossRef] 10. Blau FD, Ferber MA, Winkler AE. The economics of women, men, and work. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall; 1998
  7. Blumenthal JA. The reasonable woman standard: A meta-analytic review of gender diffrences in perceptions of sexual harassment. Law Hum Behav 1998;22:33–57. [CrossRef] 12. Rotundo M, Nguyen DH, Sackett, PR. 2001. A meta-analytic review of gender diffrences in perceptions of sexual harassment. J Appl Psychol 2001;86:914–22. [CrossRef] 13. Collins EG, Blodgett TB. Sexual harassment. some see it. some won't. Harv Bus Rev 1981;59:76–95
  8. American Association of University Women. Hostile hallways: Bullying, teasing, and sexual harassment in school. New York: Harris Scholastic Research; 2001
  9. Petersen JL, Hyde JS. 2009. A longitudinal investigation of peer sexual harassment victimization in adolescence. J Adolesc 2009;32:1173–88. [CrossRef] 16. Ohse DM, Stockdale MS. Age comparisons in wo