Dergiler / Eurasian Journal of Medical Investigation / 2019 / Cilt: 3 - Sayı: 4

Assessment of Efficacy, Reliability, Side Effects and Patient Compliance of Entecavir in Turkish Patients with Nukleos(t)ide Analogues Naive Chronic Hepatitis B

Sayfa
322–326
Yayın Tarihi
2022-10-12
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Patients should be followed up more closely in terms of renal function during treatment.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Objectives: This study aimed to assess the entecavir (ENT) in Turkish patients with nukleos(t)ide analogues (NA) naivechronic hepatitis B (CHB).Methods: The data in this study were collected retrospectively.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:The rates of compliance, biological, virological, andserological responses, and drug resistance and the frequency of ENT-related side effects were determined.Results: A total of 40 patients were enrolled in this study.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Patients should be followed up more closely in terms of renal function during treatment.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

Objectives: This study aimed to assess the entecavir (ENT) in Turkish patients with nukleos(t)ide analogues (NA) naivechronic hepatitis B (CHB).Methods: The data in this study were collected retrospectively. The rates of compliance, biological, virological, andserological responses, and drug resistance and the frequency of ENT-related side effects were determined.Results: A total of 40 patients were enrolled in this study. The rates of virological response, biochemical response inHBeAg (-) patients were 100% and 96.6%, respectively. There was no HBsAg loss in HBeAg (-) patients. The rates ofvirological response, biochemical response, serological response, and HBsAg loss in HBeAg (+) patients were 100%,90%, 70%, and 10% respectively. The rates of virological response and biochemical response in both HBeAg (-) and (+)patients were 100% and 95%, respectively. Complete response was detected in only one of 40 patients (2.5%) at the96th week of treatment. The most ENT-related side effects were fatigue. Only two patients had mild renal impairment,whereas moderate or severe renal impairment was not detected.Conclusion: The treatment of ENT can be safely used as an effective first-line drug in adult Turkish patients with NAnaiveCHB. Patients should be followed up more closely in terms of renal function during treatment.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

AKSOY, N., KUTOĞLU, K., ARICAN, N., KARAAĞAÇ, M., KALYON, S., YENİCE, N. (2022). Assessment of Efficacy, Reliability, Side Effects and Patient Compliance of Entecavir in Turkish Patients with Nukleos(t)ide Analogues Naive Chronic Hepatitis B. Eurasian Journal of Medical Investigation, Cilt: 3 - Sayı: 4, 322–326. https://ajindex.com/articles/508746

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (1)

  1. Lok AS. Prevention of hepatitis B virus-related hepatocellular carcinoma. Gastroenterology 2004;127:S303–9. [CrossRef] 2. Hepatitis B fact sheet. Geneva: World Health Organization, October 2000. Available at http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/ fs204/en/. Accessed November 11, 2008. 3. Ökten A. Türkiye’de kronik hepatit, siroz ve hepatosellüler karsinoma etiyolojisi. Çakaloğlu Y, Ökten A, editors. Hepatit B, Ulusal Uzlaşma Toplantı Metinleri. İstanbul: İstanbul Medikal Yayıncılık;2003. p.1–7. 4. Keeffe EB, Dieterich DT, Han SH, Jacobson IM, Martin P, Schiff ER, et al. A treatment algorithm for the management of chronic hepatitis B virus infection in the United States: 2008 update. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2008;6:1315-41. [CrossRef] 5. Fung J, Lai CL, Seto WK, Yuen MF. Nucleoside/nucleotide analogues in the treatment of chronic hepatitis B. J Antimicrob Chemother 2011;66:2715–25. [CrossRef] 6. Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. Baraclude® (entecavir) prescribing information (online) Available from: http://www.baraclude.com/ pi.html 7. Levey AS, Coresh J, Balk E, Kausz AT, Levin A, Steffes MW, et al. National Kidney Foundation practice guidelines for chronic kidney disease: evaluation, classification, and stratification. Ann Intern Med 2003;139:137–47. [CrossRef] 8. Chang TT, Gish RG, de Man R, Gadano A, Sollano J, Chao YC, et al. A comparison of entecavir and lamivudine for HBeAg-positive chronic hepatitis B. N Engl J Med 2006;354:1001–10. [CrossRef] 9. Gish RG, Lok AS, Chang TT, de Man RA, Gadano A, Sollano J, et al. Entecavir therapy for up to 96 weeks in patients with HBeAgpositive chronic hepatitis B. Gastroenterology 2007;133:1437– 44. [CrossRef] 10. Zheng MH, Shi KQ, Dai ZJ, Ye C, Chen YP. A 24-week, parallelgroup, open-label, randomized clinical trial comparing the early antiviral efficacy of telbivudine and entecavir in the treatment of hepatitis B e antigen-positive chronic hepatitis B virus infection in adult Chinese patients. Clin Ther 2010;32:649–58. 11. Chang TT, Liaw YF, Wu SS, Schiff E, Han KH, Lai CL, et al. Longterm entecavir therapy results in the reversal of fibrosis/cirrhosis and continued histological improvement in patients with chronic hepatitis B. Hepatology 2010;52:886–93. [CrossRef] 12. Sherman M, Yurdaydin C, Simsek H, Silva M, Liaw YF, Rustgi VK, et al. Entecavir therapy for lamivudine-refractory chronic hepatitis B: improved virologic, biochemical, and serology outcomes through 96 weeks. Hepatology 2008;48:99–108. [CrossRef] 13