KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Eurasian Journal of Medical Investigation / 2020 / Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 1

Knowledge, Attitudes and Perspectives of Anesthesiologists on Artificial Intelligence

Ali Muhittin TASDOĞAN
Sayfa
1–6
Yayın Tarihi
2022-10-12
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

We believe that further similar survey studies shouldbe conducted in order to take physicians’ opinions into account in the development of using AI in medicine.Keywords: Artificial intelligence (AI), anesthesia, anesthesiologist

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Objectives: The use of AI in medicine is increasing every passing day.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:The survey consisted of 29 questions about participants’ demographic data, professional data, andopinions on AI.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:We believe that further similar survey studies shouldbe conducted in order to take physicians’ opinions into account in the development of using AI in medicine.Keywords: Artificial intelligence (AI), anesthesia, anesthesiologist
🔬Tür:Uygulamalı Anket & Alan Araştırması
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

Objectives: The use of AI in medicine is increasing every passing day. However, there is still debate in the literatureamong specialists about several aspects of artificial intelligence (AI). The objective of this study was to evaluate andanalyze knowledge, attitudes and perspectives of anesthesiologists on AI through an online survey.Methods: An online survey was conducted in order to reveal knowledge, attitudes and perspectives of anesthesiologists on AI in Turkey. The survey consisted of 29 questions about participants’ demographic data, professional data, andopinions on AI. After physicians other than anesthesiology and reanimation specialists were excluded, responses of theremaining 68 anesthesiologists were evaluated and analyzed.Results: The rate of anesthesiologists that have sufficient knowledge of AI was found as 36.8%. Of the respondents,58.8% considered that AI offers useful applications in the field of medicine. 64.7% of the participants think that AI willcreate drastic changes in all fields of medicine. Only 2.9% of the anesthesiologists consider that AI will completely replace physicians in the near future. 5.9% of the participants reported that they are worried about developments in AI.Conclusion: AI is not expected to completely replace physicians. We believe that further similar survey studies shouldbe conducted in order to take physicians’ opinions into account in the development of using AI in medicine.Keywords: Artificial intelligence (AI), anesthesia, anesthesiologist

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

TASDOĞAN, A. M. (2022). Knowledge, Attitudes and Perspectives of Anesthesiologists on Artificial Intelligence. Eurasian Journal of Medical Investigation, Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 1, 1–6. https://ajindex.com/articles/508673

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (18)

  1. Burke HB, Goodman PH, Rosen DB, et al. Artificial neural networks improve the accuracy of cancer survival prediction. Cancer 1997;79:857–62
  2. Mayo CW, Bickford RG, and Faulconer A. Electroencephalographically controlled anesthesia in abdominal surgery. JAMA 1950;144:1081–3
  3. Guarracino F, Lapolla F, Cariello C, et al. Target controlled infusion: TCI. Minerva Anestesiol 2005;71:335–7
  4. Clémence Côté and Paul Kim. AI in anesthesiology: Moving into the future. UTMJ 2019;96:33–36
  5. Yu D. Anesthesia and Artificial Intelligence. Ann Clin Anesth Res 2019;3:1017
  6. Mandel JE. Recent advances in respiratory monitory in nonoperating room anesthesia. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol 2018;31:448–452
  7. Topol EJ. The patient will see you now: The future of medicine is in your hands. New York: Basic Books; 2015
  8. Obermeyer Z, Emanuel EJ. Predicting the future—big data, machine learning, and clinical medicine. The New England Journal of Medicine 2016;29;375:1216–19
  9. Kohane IS, Drazen JM, Campion EW. A glimpse of the next 100 years in medicine. The New England Journal of Medicine 2012;27:376:2538–2539
  10. Nemati S, Holder A, Razmi F, Stanley MD, Clifford GD, Buchman TG. An interpretable machine learning model for accurate prediction of sepsis in the ICU. Crit Care Med 2018;46:547–553
  11. Blease C, Bernstein MH, Gaab J, et al. Computerization and the future of primary care: A survey of general practitioners in the UK. PLoS One 2018;12:13:e0207418
  12. Oh S, Kim JH, Choi, et al. Physician Confidence in AI: An Online Mobile Survey. J Med Internet Res 2019;25:21:e12422
  13. Sarwar, S., Dent, A., Faust, K. et al. Physician perspectives on integration of artificial intelligence into diagnostic pathology. npj Digit. Med. 2:28:2019
  14. Doraiswamy PM, Blease C, Bodner K. AI and the future of psychiatry: insights from a global physician survey. https://arxiv. org/abs/1907.12386. Accessed October 31, 2019
  15. Smith A, Anderson M. Pew Research Center. 2017 Oct 4. Automation in everyday life URL: http://www.pewinternet.org/ 2017/10/04/automation-in-everyday-life/. Accessed October 31, 2019
  16. Krittanawong C. The rise of artificial intelligence and the uncertain future for physicians. Eur J Intern Med 2018;48:e13– e14
  17. Inkster B, Sarda S, Subramanian V. An empathy-driven, conversational artificial intelligence agent (Wysa) for digital mental well-being: real-world data evaluation mixed-methods study. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2018;23:6:e12106
  18. Sahin AR, Ates S, Gunay M