Dergiler / Eurasian Journal of Medical Investigation / 2020 / Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 3

Classical Seminoma in Geriatric Patients

Sayfa
390–394
Yayın Tarihi
2022-10-12
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Since weencounter treatment-related mortality, modification may be needed in the treatment protocol and treatment dosesaccording to the comorbidities of the patients.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Objectives: Advanced age is a well-known risk factor for cancer development.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Although 12% of cancer is seen at theage of 65 and above worldwide, when the total cancer population is evaluated, 60% of them are age 65 and above.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Since weencounter treatment-related mortality, modification may be needed in the treatment protocol and treatment dosesaccording to the comorbidities of the patients.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

Objectives: Advanced age is a well-known risk factor for cancer development. Although 12% of cancer is seen at theage of 65 and above worldwide, when the total cancer population is evaluated, 60% of them are age 65 and above. Ouraim in our study is to share our follow-up and treatment experience with patients with very rare geriatric seminoma.Methods: In our study, patients aged 65 and over who were diagnosed with seminoma between 07.09.1998-19.11.2018in our center were evaluated retrospectively. Patient interview information, patient files and electronic system datawere used for the study.Results: The data of 32 patients who were diagnosed with seminoma above 65 years of age were evaluated retrospectively. The median age of the patients is 68 (range 65-85). 24 (75%) patients stage 1; 6 (18.8%) patients are stage 2 and2 (6.3%) patients are stage 3. As a first-line approach, active monitoring for 10 (31.3%) patients; Chemotherapy was applied to 22 patients. No patient RT was applied. The follow-up period of the study is 43 (range 2-121) months. MedianPFS is 37 (range 1-115) months. The 5-year PFS value is 80.5%. During the follow-up period, 4 (13.5%) of the patientswere ex. The Median OS value is 42 (range 2-121) months, and the 5-year OS value is 88%. The relationship between thestage and the OS is meaningful.Conclusion: According to the results of our study, elderly seminoma patients can be safely treated and cured. Since weencounter treatment-related mortality, modification may be needed in the treatment protocol and treatment dosesaccording to the comorbidities of the patients.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

KARADURMUŞ, N., YILDIZ, B. (2022). Classical Seminoma in Geriatric Patients. Eurasian Journal of Medical Investigation, Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 3, 390–394. https://ajindex.com/articles/508652

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (15)

  1. Balducci L, Colloca G, Cesari M, Gambassi G. Assessment and treatment of elderly patients with cancer. Surg Oncol 2010;19:117-123
  2. Carreca I, Balducci L. Cancer chemotherapy in the older cancer patient. Urol Oncol 2009;27:633-642
  3. Siegel R, Naishadham D, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2012. CA: Cancer J Clinicians 2012;62:10-29
  4. Groll RJ, Warde P, Jewett MA. A comprehensive systematic review of testicular germ cell tumor surveillance. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 2007; 64:182
  5. Townsend JS, Richardson LC, German RR. Incidence of testicular cancer in the United States, 1999-2004. Am J Mens Health. 2010;4:353-360
  6. Warde P, Gospodarowicz M. Evolving concepts in stage I seminoma. BJU Int 2009; 104:1357
  7. Spermon JR, Witjes JA, Kiemeney LA. Difference in stage and morphology-adjusted survival between young and elderly patients with a testicular germ cell tumor. Urology. 2002;60:889- 893
  8. Biggs ML, Schwartz SM. Cancer of the Testis. In: Ries LAG, Young JL, Keel GE, Eisner MP, Lin YD, Horner MJ, editors. SEER Survival Monograph: Cancer Survival Among Adults: U.S. SEER Program, 1988-2001, Patient and Tumor Characteristics. NIH Publication 07-6215. Bethesda, MD: National Cancer Institute; 2007:165-170
  9. Berney DM, Warren AY, Verma M et al.vMalignant germ cell tumours in the elderly: a histopathological review of 50 cases in men aged 60 years or over. Mod Pathol 2008; 21: 54–59
  10. Wheater MJ, Manners J, Nolan L, Simmonds PD, Hayes MC, Mead GM. The clinical features and management of testicular germ cell tumours in patients aged 60 years and older. BJU Int. 2011;108:1794-1799
  11. Bhardwa JM, Powles T, Berney D, Baithun S, Nargund VH, Oliver RT. Assessing the size and stage of testicular germ cell tumours: 1984-2003. BJU Int. 2005;96:819-821
  12. Muss HB, Woolf S, Berry D, et al. Adjuvant chemotherapy in older and younger women with lymph node-positive breast cancer. JAMA. 2005;293:1073-1081
  13. Earle CC, Tsai JS, Gelber RD, Weinstein MC, Neumann PJ, Weeks JC. Effectiveness of chemotherapy for advanced lung cancer in the elderly: instrumental variable and propensity analysis. J Clin Oncol. 2001;19:1064-1070
  14. Muss HB, Berry DA, Cirrincione C, et al. Toxicity of older and younger patients treated with adjuvant chemotherapy for node-positive breast cancer: the Cancer and Leukemia Group B Experience. J.Clin Oncol. 2007;25:3699-3704
  15. Haugnes HS, Solhaug Ø, Stenberg J, Hjelle LV, Bremnes RM. Seminoma patients treated at a minör oncological departm