Dergiler / Eurasian Journal of Medical Investigation / 2021 / Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 2

ICE Regimen in Adult Advanced/Relapsed Soft TissueSarcoma Patients; is it More Effective in Early Use?Retrospective Analysis of Single Center Study

Sayfa
274–282
Yayın Tarihi
2022-10-12
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Conclusion: The ICE regimen may be particularly effective when used for early treatment after doxorubicin-basedtherapy in patients with advanced or relapsed soft tissue sarcomas.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Objectives: To analyze the efficacy and tolerability of the ICE regimen and prognostic factors for survival in patientswith advanced or relapsed soft tissue sarcomas treated with the ICE regimen (ifosfamide, carboplatin and etoposide).
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Methods: The records of 28 patients diagnosed with advanced or relapsed soft tissue sarcoma who were treated withthe ICE regimen at our center between 2008 and 2020, were evaluated retrospectively.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Conclusion: The ICE regimen may be particularly effective when used for early treatment after doxorubicin-basedtherapy in patients with advanced or relapsed soft tissue sarcomas.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:2008 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

Objectives: To analyze the efficacy and tolerability of the ICE regimen and prognostic factors for survival in patientswith advanced or relapsed soft tissue sarcomas treated with the ICE regimen (ifosfamide, carboplatin and etoposide). Methods: The records of 28 patients diagnosed with advanced or relapsed soft tissue sarcoma who were treated withthe ICE regimen at our center between 2008 and 2020, were evaluated retrospectively. Results: The most common histopathological subtype were pleomorphic sarcoma (9/32.1%). After a median follow-upduration of 8 months, the median PFS and OS were 6 months (95% confidence interval (CI), 3.6–8.3) and 9.3 months(95% CI, 4.7–13.9), respectively. A multivariate analysis for overall survival revealed the ICE treatment line (HR:4.8, 95%Cl 1.7–12.8, p: 0.002), tumor site (HR: 0.12, 95% Cl 0.03–0.4, p: 0.001) and response to ICE regimen (HR: 0.09, 95% Cl0.01–0.49, p: 0.005) to be independent prognostic factors. The group that received 1–2 chemotherapy regimens priorto the ICE regimen recorded better OS than the group received more than two chemotherapy regimens (22.8 monthsvs 5 months, p: 0.006). Conclusion: The ICE regimen may be particularly effective when used for early treatment after doxorubicin-basedtherapy in patients with advanced or relapsed soft tissue sarcomas.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

IŞIKDOĞAN, A., KÜÇÜKÖNER, M., SEZGİN, Y., EBİNÇ, S., KAPLAN, M. A., URAKCİ, Z., ORUÇ, Z., KARHAN, O., ORUÇ, I. (2022). ICE Regimen in Adult Advanced/Relapsed Soft TissueSarcoma Patients; is it More Effective in Early Use?Retrospective Analysis of Single Center Study. Eurasian Journal of Medical Investigation, Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 2, 274–282. https://ajindex.com/articles/508596

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (9)

  1. Jo VY, Fletcher CD. WHO classification of soft tissue tumours: an update based on the 2013 (4th) edition. Pathology 2014;46:95–104
  2. Ryan CW, Desai J. The past, present, and future of cytotoxic chemotherapy and pathway-directed targeted agents for soft tissue sarcoma. Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book. 2013. doi: 10.1200/EdBook_AM.2013.33.e386 3. Frezza AM, Stacchiotti S, Gronchi A. Systemic treatment in advanced soft tissue sarcoma: what is standard, what is new. BMC Med 2017;15:109
  3. Judson I, Verweij J, Gelderblom H, Hartmann JT, Schoffski P, Blay JY, et al. Doxorubicin alone versus intensified doxorubicin plus ifosfamide for first-line treatment of advanced or metastatic soft-tissue sarcoma: a randomised controlled phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol 2014;15:415–23
  4. Santoro A, Tursz T, Mouridsen H, Verweij J, Steward W, Somers R, et al. Doxorubicin versus CYVADIC versus doxorubicin plus ifosfamide in first-line treatment of advanced soft tissue sarcomas: a randomized study of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Soft Tissue and Bone Sarcoma Group. J Clin Oncol 1995;13:1537–45
  5. Le Cesne A, Judson I, Crowther D, Rodenhuis S, Keizer HJ, Van Hoesel Q, et al. Randomized phase III study comparing conventional-dose doxorubicin plus ifosfamide versus high-dose doxorubicin plus ifosfamide plus recombinant human granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor in advanced soft tissue sarcomas: A trial of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer/Soft Tissue and Bone Sarcoma Group. J Clin Oncol 2000;18:2676–84
  6. Maurel J, López-Pousa A, de Las Peñas R, Fra J, Martín J, Cruz J, et al. Efficacy of sequential high-dose doxorubicin and ifosfamide compared with standard-dose doxorubicin in patients with advanced soft tissue sarcoma: an open-label randomized phase II study of the Spanish group for research on sarcomas. J Clin Oncol 2009;27:1893–8
  7. Harris SJ, Benson C, Jones RL. Current and advancing systemic treatment options for soft tissue sarcomas. Expert Opin Pharmacother 2015;16:2023–37
  8. Skafida E, Kokkali S, Nikolaou M, Digklia A. Metastatic soft tissue sarcoma: current treatment landscape and future perspectives. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther 2017;17:537–43
  9. Kung FH, Desai SJ, Dickerman JD, Goorin AM, Harris MB, Inoue S, et al. Ifosfamide/carboplatin/etoposide (ICE) for recurrent malignant solid tumors of childhood: a Pediatric Oncology Group Phase I/II study. J Pediatr Hematol Oncol 1995;17:265–9. 11