KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Eurasian Journal of Medical Investigation / 2021 / Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 1

Is Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography Safe in Elder patients?-A Single Center Experience

Sezgin YILMAZ
Serkan ADEMOĞLU
Zeliha ADEMOĞLU
Yüksel ARIKAN
Sayfa
51–56
Yayın Tarihi
2022-10-12
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

All complications wereobserved to be increasing with sphincteratomy.Conclusion: Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography is a safe and effective technique in elderly patients butendoscopists should be more careful about complications in elderly patients.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Objectives: The endoscopic retrograde cholongiopancreatography (ERCP) process is canulization of papilla vateri radiolologically and imaging bilier tructs and pancreas duct by a lateral endoscope.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Patients who performed ERCP in Afyon Kocatepe University Training and Research Hospital were included in order to determine the frequency of complications after ERCP and defining the riskfactors and determiners for each complication.Results: A total of 60 patients (29 female and 31male) were included.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:All complications wereobserved to be increasing with sphincteratomy.Conclusion: Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography is a safe and effective technique in elderly patients butendoscopists should be more careful about complications in elderly patients.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

Objectives: The endoscopic retrograde cholongiopancreatography (ERCP) process is canulization of papilla vateri radiolologically and imaging bilier tructs and pancreas duct by a lateral endoscope. ERCP process has some severe complications. In this study, we aimed to assess the safety of ERCP in elderly patients.Methods: This is a prospective study. Patients who performed ERCP in Afyon Kocatepe University Training and Research Hospital were included in order to determine the frequency of complications after ERCP and defining the riskfactors and determiners for each complication.Results: A total of 60 patients (29 female and 31male) were included. The median age was 57.3. The most frequentERCP indication was choledocholithiasis (60%). In 15% of patients were observed after ERCP. The major complicationwas cholangitis (8.3%). Pancreatitis (5%) were detected to be seen in subsequent frequency. All complications wereobserved to be increasing with sphincteratomy.Conclusion: Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography is a safe and effective technique in elderly patients butendoscopists should be more careful about complications in elderly patients.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

YILMAZ, S., ADEMOĞLU, S., ADEMOĞLU, Z., ARIKAN, Y. (2022). Is Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography Safe in Elder patients?-A Single Center Experience. Eurasian Journal of Medical Investigation, Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 1, 51–56. https://ajindex.com/articles/508552

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (14)

  1. Mani S, Rananavare R, Parikh S, Kulkarni S, Patel R. Sonographic evaluation of common bile duct stonesa.prospective comparison with endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Bombay Hospital Journal 1996;38:2–5
  2. Ott DJ, Young GP, Mitchell RG, Chen MY, Gelfand DW. Therapeutic ERCP: spectrum of procedures performed in 60 consecutive patients. Abdom Imaging. 1994;19:30–3
  3. Freeman ML. Understanding risk factors and avoiding complications with endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Curr Gastroenterol Rep. 2003;5:145–53
  4. Britton, J. Biliary and pancreatic endoscopy. In: Morris PJ, Wood WC, editors. Oxford Textbook of Surgery. 2nd ed. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2000. p. 551–8
  5. Zippi M, De Felici I, Pica R, Occhigrossi G, Traversa G. Comparison of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography between elderly and younger patients for common bile duct stones. Clin Ter 2013;164:e353–8
  6. Ashton CE, McNabb WR, Wilkinson ML, Lewis RR. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in elderly patients. Age Ageing 1998;27:683–8
  7. Sugiyama M, Atomi Y. Endoscopic sphincterotomy for bile duct stones in patients 90 years of age and older. Gastrointest Endosc 2000;52:187–91
  8. Plummer JM, Arthurs M, McDonald AH, Mitchell DIG, McFarlane MEC, Newnham MS, et al. ERCP use at the UHWI. West Ind Med J 2004;53:234–7
  9. Beaton HL. Surgical considerations. In: Gelb A, editor. Clinical Gastroenterology in the Elderly. New York: Marcel Dekker; 1996. p. 271–82
  10. Sullivan DM, Hood TR. Griffin WO. Biliary tract surgery in the elderly. Am J Surg 1982;143:218–20
  11. Ranson JH. Acute pancreatitis. In: Zinner MJ, Schwartz SI, Ellis H, Ashley SW, McFadden DW, editors. Maingot’s abdominal operations. 10th ed. Stamford: Appleton & Lange; 1997. p. 1899-915
  12. Doerr RJ, Kulaylat MN, Booth FV, Corasanti J. Barotrauma complicating duodenal perforation during ERCP. Surg Endosc 1996;10:349–51
  13. Wang P, Zhang W, Liu F, Li ZS, Ren X, Fan ZN, et al. Success and complication rates of two precut techniques, transpancreatic sphincterotomy and needle-knife sphincterotomy for bile duct cannulation. J Gastrointest Surg 2010;14:697–704
  14. MacMahon M, Walsh TN, Brennan P, Osborne H, Courtney MG. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in the elderly: a single unit audit. Gerontology 1993;39:28–32.