The final chapter, “Integration and Forest preservation”, summarises the main findings of the author: Forestry policy reform was directed at the commercial aspect of forest exploitation; its main focus was on the role of the State in the field of logging and concessions; reform supported the ruling elites predatory capacities; when policy reform failed external actors disengaged from
📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale
🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:The final chapter, “Integration and Forest preservation”, summarises the main findings of the author: Forestry policy reform was directed at the commercial aspect of forest exploitation; its main focus was on the role of the State in the field of logging and concessions; reform supported the ruling elites predatory capacities; when policy reform failed external actors disengaged from
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:The final chapter, “Integration and Forest preservation”, summarises the main findings of the author: Forestry policy reform was directed at the commercial aspect of forest exploitation; its main focus was on the role of the State in the field of logging and concessions; reform supported the ruling elites predatory capacities; when policy reform failed external actors disengaged from
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:The final chapter, “Integration and Forest preservation”, summarises the main findings of the author: Forestry policy reform was directed at the commercial aspect of forest exploitation; its main focus was on the role of the State in the field of logging and concessions; reform supported the ruling elites predatory capacities; when policy reform failed external actors disengaged from
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri
Abstract
The final chapter, “Integration and Forest preservation”, summarises the main findings of the author: Forestry policy reform was directed at the commercial aspect of forest exploitation; its main focus was on the role of the State in the field of logging and concessions; reform supported the ruling elites predatory capacities; when policy reform failed external actors disengaged from
🔖
Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap
GUÉRİN, M. (2022). ANDREW COCK, GOVERNING CAMBODIA’S FORESTS: THE INTERNATIONAL POLITICS OF POLICY REFORM, COPENHAGEN. Eurasian Journal of Forest Science, Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 2, 30–33. https://ajindex.com/articles/508511
Brocheux, P. and Hémery, D. (2009). Indochina. An Ambiguous Colonization, 1858-1954. University of California Press.
Berkeley Ebihara, M. (1984). Societal organization in Sixteen and Seventeen Century Cambodia. Journal of Southeast Asian Studies, 15 (2), 280-295.
Edwards, P. (2007). Cambodge, the Cultivation of a Nation 1860-1945,
University of Hawaii Press, Honolulu. Guérin, M. (2008). Paysans de la forêt à l’époque coloniale, la pacification des aborigènes des hautes terres du Cambodge, 1863-1940.
AHSR. Caen. Khin, S. (1991). Le Cambodge entre le Siam et le Vietnam (de 1775 à 1860). EFEO, Paris. Killen, T.J. (2012). The Cardamom Conundrum. Reconciling Development and Conservation in the Kingdom of Cambodia. NUS Press,
Singapore. Mak, P. (1995). Histoire du Cambodge de la fin du XVIe siècle au début du XVIIIe siècle. EFEO, Paris. Mikaelian, G. (2009) La royauté d’Oudong, réformes des institutions et crise du pouvoir dans le royaume khmer du XVIIe siècle. PUPS, Paris. Mikaelian, G. (2012). Cambodge, une agonie programmée. In: Jammes, J. & de Tréglodé, B. (eds). L’Asie du Sud-Est 2012.
IRASEC, Bangkok, 131-150.
Reid, A. (1988 & 1993). Southeast Asia in the Age of Commerce, 1450-1680.
Yale University Press,
New Haven. Scott, J. C. (2009), The Art of Not Being Governed. An Anarchist History of Upland Southeast Asia. Yale University Press,
New Haven. Slocomb, M. (2007). Colons and Coolies: the development of Cambodia’s rubber plantations. White Lotus. Bangkok. Thomas. F. (2003). La forêt mise à nue. essai anthropologique sur la construction d'un objet scientifique tropical: ‘forêts et bois coloniaux d'Indochine’: 1860-1940. [PhD Dissertation] Ecole des Hautes Etudes en Sciences Sociales EHESS, Paris, France. Tully, J. (2011). The Devil’s Milk. A Social History of Rubber. Monthly Review Press,
New York. Um, V. (2016). Les paysans cambodgiens et la crise de 1929 (exemple de la province de Kompong Thom). [Master Dissertation] Institut National des Langues et Civilisations orientales, Université Royale des Beaux-Arts, Phnom Penh, Cambodia.