KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Eurasian Journal of Family Medicine / 2021 / Cilt: 10 - Sayı: 4

Evaluation of YouTube Videos as a Source of Information on Non-Invasive Prenatal Testing

Cem YENER
Sayfa
181–186
Yayın Tarihi
2022-10-12
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

If the quality of the videos increases, patients can have sufficient and accurate information about non-invasive prenatal, especially during these pandemic days.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Aim: Non-invasive prenatal testing is a method that determines the risk of a fetus being born with certain genetic abnormalities.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Methods: The term "Non-invasive prenatal testing" was entered in the YouTube search bar on May 1, 2021, and the top 50 YouTube videos of the non-invasive prenatal testing with the highest number of views were recorded after the exclusion of videos with a non-English language, videos repeated twice and irrelevant videos.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:If the quality of the videos increases, patients can have sufficient and accurate information about non-invasive prenatal, especially during these pandemic days.
🔬Tür:Uygulamalı Anket & Alan Araştırması
📍Kapsam:2021 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

Aim: Non-invasive prenatal testing is a method that determines the risk of a fetus being born with certain genetic abnormalities. In this study, we aimed to examine the quality of information on YouTube for non-invasive prenatal testing. Methods: The term "Non-invasive prenatal testing" was entered in the YouTube search bar on May 1, 2021, and the top 50 YouTube videos of the non-invasive prenatal testing with the highest number of views were recorded after the exclusion of videos with a non-English language, videos repeated twice and irrelevant videos. Length of the videos, likes, and dislikes were recorded. Videos were evaluated by two obstetricians. A questionnaire consisting of 9 dichotomous questions was conducted to assess whether there was adequate information about non-invasive prenatal testing. In addition, video quality was evaluated with the Global Quality Scale, the Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool and the Journal of the American Medical Association Benchmark Criteria. Results: The mean Global Quality Scale was 2.96􀂓0.62. Most videos answered the question: 􀂵What is non-invasive prenatal testing?􀂶 (94%), and 􀂵How is non-invasive prenatal testing done?􀂶 (82%). However, there was a lack of information about the limitation of non-invasive prenatal testing in certain situations (only %16 of videos answered limitations of non-invasive prenatal testing). Three (6%) of the videos had misinformation. The mean Global Quality Scale was 2.96±0.62. The Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool mean value was 72% and 58% in terms of understandability and actionability, respectively. The mean Journal of the American Medical Association Benchmark Criteria score was found as 1.4±0.8. Conclusion: The videos posted about non-invasive prenatal testing on YouTube were of poor-moderate quality. If the quality of the videos increases, patients can have sufficient and accurate information about non-invasive prenatal, especially during these pandemic days.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

YENER, C. (2022). Evaluation of YouTube Videos as a Source of Information on Non-Invasive Prenatal Testing. Eurasian Journal of Family Medicine, Cilt: 10 - Sayı: 4, 181–186. https://ajindex.com/articles/508319

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (10)

  1. Palomaki GE, Kloza EM, Lambert-Messerlian GM, Haddow JE, Neveux LM, Ehrich M, et al. DNA sequencing of maternal plasma to detect Down syndrome: an international clinical validation study. Genet Med 2011;13(11):913-20. doi: 10.1097/GIM.0b013e3182368a0e
  2. Norton ME, Brar H, Weiss J, Karimi A, Laurent LC, Caughey AB, et al. Non-Invasive Chromosomal Evaluation (NICE) Study: results of a multicenter prospective cohort study for detection of fetal trisomy 21 and trisomy 18. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2012;207(2):137.e1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2012.05.021
  3. Sparks AB, Wang ET, Struble CA, Barrett W, Stokowski R, McBride C, et al. Selective analysis of cell-free DNA in maternal blood for evaluation of fetal trisomy. Prenat Diagn 2012;32(1):3-9. doi: 10.1002/pd.2922
  4. Omnicore [Internet]. YouTube by the numbers: stats, demographics & fun facts [cited 2021 Mey 10]. Available from:
  5. YouTube [Internet]. YouTube policies and security. [cited 2021 May 10]. Available from:
  6. Tamminga S, van Dussen L, Verweij EJ, de Boer MA, Cornel MC, Henneman L. What do people want to know about NIPT? Content analysis of questions emailed to national NIPT information websites. Prenat Diagn 2017;37(4):412-5. doi: 10.1002/pd.5011
  7. Bernard A, Langille M, Hughes S, Rose C, Leddin D, Veldhuyzen van Zanten S. A systematic review of patient inflammatory bowel disease information resources on the World Wide Web. Am J Gastroenterol 2007;102(9):2070-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2007.01325.x
  8. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality [Internet]. The Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool (PEMAT) and user􀂶s guide [cited 2021 May 10]. Available from: https://www.ahrq.gov/health-literacy/patienteducation/ pemat.html 9. Shoemaker SJ, Wolf MS, Brach C. Development of the Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool (PEMAT): a new measure of understandability and actionability for print and audiovisual patient information. Patient Educ Couns 2014;96(3):395-403. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2014.05.027
  9. Silberg WM, Lundberg GD, Musacchio RA. Assessing, controlling, and assuring the quality of medical information on the Internet: Caveant lector et viewor--Let the reader and viewer beware. JAMA 1997;277(15):1244-5. PMID: 9103351
  10. Kunze KN, Cohn MR, Wakefield C, Hamati F, LaPrade RF, Forsythe B, et al. YouTube as a source of information about the posterior cruciate ligament: