KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Eurasian Journal of Emergency Medicine / 2014 / Cilt: 13 - Sayı: 2

Approach to Patients with Syncope in Emergeny Department - An Evidence-Based Review

Orçun ÇİFTCİ
Polat DURUKAN
Cemil KAVALCI
Sayfa
82–91
Yayın Tarihi
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

It also incorporates the recommendations of the American College of Emergency Physicians (ACEP) 2007 policy statement regarding patients with syncope. (JAEM 2014; 13: 82-91) Key words:

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Syncope is an important health problem, constituting 1%-5% of all emergency service admissions and up to 6% of all hospitalizations.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:In addition, only up to 50% of patients with syncope can be diagnosed with a final diagnosis, despite all efforts.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:It also incorporates the recommendations of the American College of Emergency Physicians (ACEP) 2007 policy statement regarding patients with syncope. (JAEM 2014; 13: 82-91) Key words:
🔬Tür:Literatür & Derleme Çalışması
📍Kapsam:2007 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

Syncope is an important health problem, constituting 1%-5% of all emergency service admissions and up to 6% of all hospitalizations. Substantial experience with patient history and physical examination and time are required to diagnose syncope in patients presenting with transient loss of consciousness. In addition, only up to 50% of patients with syncope can be diagnosed with a final diagnosis, despite all efforts. Thus, management of syncope in emergency departments has shifted from reaching a final diagnosis and treatment to short-, moderate-, or long-term risk stratification systems, allowing decisions for outpatient man- agement, including specialized branch care, or admission for further work-up. This review discusses the definition of syncope-related transient loss of conscious- ness, differential diagnosis of syncope, diagnostic methods and algorithms, and the main risk stratification studies. It also incorporates the recommendations of the American College of Emergency Physicians (ACEP) 2007 policy statement regarding patients with syncope. (JAEM 2014; 13: 82-91) Key words:

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

ÇİFTCİ, O., DURUKAN, P., KAVALCI, C. (2022). Approach to Patients with Syncope in Emergeny Department - An Evidence-Based Review. Eurasian Journal of Emergency Medicine, Cilt: 13 - Sayı: 2, 82–91. https://ajindex.com/articles/508258

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (17)

  1. Task Force for the Diagnosis and Management of Syncope
  2. European So- ciety of Cardiology (ESC)
  3. European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA)
  4. Heart Failure Association (HFA)
  5. Heart Rhythm Society (HRS). Moya A, Sutton R, Ammirati F, Blanc JJ, Brignole M, Dahm JB, et al. Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of syncope. Eur Heart J 2009
  6. Blanc JJ, L’Her C, Touiza A, Garo B, L’Her E, Mansourati J. Prospective eval- uation and outcome of patients admitted for syncope over a 1 year peri- od. Eur Heart J 2002
  7. [CrossRef] Quinn JV, Stiell IG, McDermott DA, Sellers KL, Kohn MA, Wells GA. Deri- vation of the San Francisco syncope rule to predict patients with short- term serious outcomes. Ann Emerg Med 2004
  8. [CrossRef] Crane SD. Risk stratification of patients with syncope in an accident and emergency department. Emerg Med J 2002
  9. [CrossRef] Kapoor WN, Karpf M, Maher Y, Miller RA, Levey GS. Syncope of unknown origin. JAMA 1982
  10. [CrossRef] Huff JS, Decker WW, Quinn JV, Perron AD, Napoli AM, Peeters S, Jagoda AS. American College of Emergency Physicians. Clinical policy: critical issues in the evaluation and management of adult patients presenting to the emergency department with syncope. Ann Emerg Med 2007
  11. [CrossRef] Soteriades ES, Evans JC, Larson MG, Chen MH, Chen L, Benjamin EJ, Levy D. Incidence and prognosis of syncope. N Engl J Med 2002
  12. [CrossRef] Crampton DE, Berkovic SF. The borderland of epilepsy: clinical and mo- lecular features of phenomena that mimic epileptic seizures. Lancet Neurol 2009
  13. [CrossRef] Sheldon Resuscitation, Rose S, Ritchie D, Connolly SJ, Koshman ML, Lee MA, et al. Historical criteria that distinguish syncope from seizures. J Am Coll Cardiol 2002
  14. [CrossRef] McKeon A, Vaughan C, Delanty N. Seizure versus syncope. Lancet Neurol 2006
  15. [CrossRef] M.J. Reed, D.E. Newby, A.J. Coull, R.J. Prescott, K.G. Jacques, A.J. Gray The ROSE (Risk stratification Of Syncope in the Emergency department) study J Am Coll Cardiol 2010
  16. [CrossRef] Brignole M, Disertoni M, Menozzi C, Raviele A, Alboni P, Pitzalis MV et al. Evaluation of Guidelines in Syncope Study (EGSYS) group. Management of syncope referred urgently to general hospitals with and without syn- cope units. Europace 2003
  17. [CrossRef] Colivicchi F, Ammirati F, Melina D, Guido V, Imperoli G, Santini M et al. OE- SIL (Osservatorio Epidemiologico sulla Sinc