Dergiler / Eurasian Journal of Emergency Medicine / 2014 / Cilt: 13 - Sayı: 4

The Practice of Emergency Medicine Residents Regarding the Use of Personal Protective Equipment for Protection against Infectious Diseases

Sayfa
176–180
Yayın Tarihi
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

There are also some deficiencies in medical institutions with regard to preparing the physical conditions of the emergency rooms and resident education programs.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Objective: The aim of this study is to demonstrate the attitudes and practices regarding the use of personal protective equipment among emergency medicine residents.Material and Methods: In this cross-sectional survey study, emergency medicine residents who had attended the 6th Emergency Medicine Resident's Symposium were included.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Results: Sixty-seven emergency medicine residents were surveyed. 83.6% of them was working at education and research hospitals and 16.4% was working at university hospitals.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:There are also some deficiencies in medical institutions with regard to preparing the physical conditions of the emergency rooms and resident education programs.
🔬Tür:Uygulamalı Anket & Alan Araştırması
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study is to demonstrate the attitudes and practices regarding the use of personal protective equipment among emergency medicine residents.Material and Methods: In this cross-sectional survey study, emergency medicine residents who had attended the 6th Emergency Medicine Resident's Symposium were included. In the first part of the survey, demographic characteristics, duration of residency and medical career and the institutions were investigated. In the second part, the attitudes of using personal protective equipment and also the physical status of the emergency rooms were assessed. Results: Sixty-seven emergency medicine residents were surveyed. 83.6% of them was working at education and research hospitals and 16.4% was working at university hospitals. The question about the existence of personal pro-tective equipment was affirmed by only 28.4% of the participants. 26.9% of the participants took lessons about protection from infectious diseases during their residency training. The statistical comparisons between the presence of isolation rooms and the type of the institution and being trained about personal protection against infectious diseases were not significant (p>0.05).Conclusion: Emergency medicine residents, who make the first medical intervention with most patients, do not use personal protective methods effectively. There are also some deficiencies in medical institutions with regard to preparing the physical conditions of the emergency rooms and resident education programs.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

GÜNEYSEL, Ö., ÖZTÜRK, T. C., TALİ, A., TOPAL, T. (2022). The Practice of Emergency Medicine Residents Regarding the Use of Personal Protective Equipment for Protection against Infectious Diseases. Eurasian Journal of Emergency Medicine, Cilt: 13 - Sayı: 4, 176–180. https://ajindex.com/articles/508229

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (1)

  1. Turnberg W, Daniell W, Seixas N, Simpson T, Van Buren J, Lipkin E, et al. Appraisal of recommended respiratory infection control practices in primary care and emergency department settings Am J Infect Control 2008; 36: 268-75. [CrossRef] 2. Timilshina N, Ansari MA, Dayal V. Risk of infection among health workers in the Western Development Region, Nepal: knowledge and compliance J Infect Dev Ctries 2011; 5: 18-22. 3. World Health Organization: Summary of probable SARS cases with onset of illness from November 1, 2002 to July 31, 2003 (based on data as of December 31, 2003). April 2004. Available from: URL: http://www.who. int/csr/sars/country/table2004_04_21/en/index.html 4. Hosoglu S, Akalin S, Sunbul M, Otkun M, Ozturk R; Occupational Infections Study Group. Healthcare workers' compliance with universal precautions in Turkey. Med Hypotheses 2011; 77: 1079-82. [CrossRef] 5. Caplan ES, Preas MA, Kerns T, Soderstrom C, Bosse M, Bansal J, et al. Seroprevalence of human immunodeficiency virus, hepatitis B virus, hepatitis C virus, and rapid plasma reagin in a trauma population. J Trauma 1995; 39: 533-7. [CrossRef] 6. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention: Guidance for the Selection and Use of Personal Protective Equipment in Healthcare Settings. Available from: URL: http://www.cdc.gov/HAI/prevent/ppe.html. 7. World Health Organization: Epidemic-and pandemic-prone acute respiratory diseases. Infection prevention and control in health care. April 2008. Available from: URL: http://www.who.int/csr/resources/publications/ aidememoireepidemicpandemid/en/index.html. 8. Loeb M, Dafoe N, Mahony J, John M, Sarabia A, Glavin V, et al. Surgical mask vs N95 respirator for preventing influenza among health care workers: a randomized trial. JAMA 2009; 302: 1865-71. [CrossRef] 9. Rothman RE, Irvin CB, Moran GJ, Sauer L, Bradshaw YS, Fry RB Jr, et al. Respiratory hygiene in the emergency department. J Emerg Nurs 2007; 33: 119-34. [CrossRef] 10. Udayasiri R, Knott J, Taylor DM, Papson J, Leow F, Hassan FA. Emergency department staff can effectively resusscitate in level C personal protective equipment Emerg Med Australas 2007; 19: 113-21. [CrossRef] 11. Bolon M. Hand hygiene. Infect Dis Clin North Am 2011; 25: 21-43. [CrossRef] 12. Daugherty EL. Health care worker protection in mass casualty respiratory failure: Infection control, decontamination, and personal protective equipment. Respir Care 2008; 53: 201-14.