Dergiler / Eurasian Journal of Emergency Medicine / 2016 / Cilt: 15 - Sayı: 2

Prevalence and Post-exposure Prophylaxis use for Needlestick Injuries among Health Care Providers in a Tertiary Care Hospital in Kochi, India

Sayfa
73–77
Yayın Tarihi
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Periodic updates about PEP should also be made to raise awareness among HPs. (Eurasian J Emerg Med 2016; 15: 73-7)

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Aim: The post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) protocol in needlestick injuries (NSIs) associated with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) needs to be evaluated in a developing country like India.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Secondary data for 8 years were recorded.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Periodic updates about PEP should also be made to raise awareness among HPs. (Eurasian J Emerg Med 2016; 15: 73-7)
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:2006 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

Aim: The post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) protocol in needlestick injuries (NSIs) associated with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) needs to be evaluated in a developing country like India. The aim of this study was to assess the prevalence of NSI and PEP use for HIV exposure in NSIs among health care providers (HPs) in India. Materials and Methods: A cross-sectional, institution-based study was conducted among HPs in Amrita Institute of Medical Sciences, Kochi, India. Secondary data for 8 years were recorded. The study population included HPs who had NSIs and who reported to the Emergency Department of the hospital. Descriptive statistics and logistic regression analysis were used. Results: A total of 949 self-reported cases of NSIs from January 2006 to December 2014 were reported, of which 42.9% were from staff nurses. HPs employed in general/specialty wards (32.5%) had the highest NSI incidence rate. In total, 67.7% of the NSIs were moderately deep, while 22.6% of them were superficial. The commonest device involved was the hypodermic needle (36.7%). Most NSIs occurred during “post-procedure work-up” (64%). Further, 32 HPs had received NSIs from known HIV seropositive patients. Totally, 62.5% of the HPs involved were staff nurses, with a mean age of 26 years. Of the 32 HPs, 28 were given prophylactic triple-drug anti-retroviral treatment. All 28 HPs were followed up for 6 months, and no seropositivity was reported. Conclusion: The present study shows the high prevalence of NSIs among HPs, particularly among staff nurses. HPs have always known to be at risk of contracting acquired infectious diseases. In light of new emerging communicable diseases with new or unknown pathogens as causative agents, the prevention of NSIs among HPs has acquired significant value. Periodic health education campaigns should be promoted, and strict adherence to standard precautionary protocols should be made mandatory to prevent and minimize the incidence of NSIs among HPs. Periodic updates about PEP should also be made to raise awareness among HPs. (Eurasian J Emerg Med 2016; 15: 73-7)

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

KUMAR, V., KRİSHNAN, A. K., KS, G. K., TS, S. K., TP, S., SOMAN, S. (2022). Prevalence and Post-exposure Prophylaxis use for Needlestick Injuries among Health Care Providers in a Tertiary Care Hospital in Kochi, India. Eurasian Journal of Emergency Medicine, Cilt: 15 - Sayı: 2, 73–77. https://ajindex.com/articles/508153

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (1)

  1. Prüss-Ustün A, Rapiti E, Hutin Y. Estimation of the global burden of disease attributable to contaminated sharps injuries among health-care workers. Am J Ind Med 2005; 48: 48-90. [CrossRef] 2. Tarantola A, Abiteboul D, Rachline A. Infection risks following accidental exposure to blood or body fluids in health care workers: a review of pathogens transmitted in published cases. Am J Infect Control 2006; 34: 367-75. [CrossRef] 3. Bryant J, Baxter L, Hird S. Non-occupational postexposure prophylaxis for HIV: a systematic review. Health Technol Assess 2009; 13: 1-60. [CrossRef] 4. Radha R, Khan A. Epidemiology of needle stick injuries among the healthcare workers of rural tertiary care hospital – A cross sectional study. Nat J Community Med 2012; 3: 589-94. 5. Cardo DM, Culver DH, Ciesielski CA, Srivastava PU, Marcus R, Abiteboul D, et al. A case-control study of HIV seroconversion in health care workers after percutaneous exposure. N Engl J Med 1997; 337: 1485-90. [CrossRef] 6. Hashmi A. Prevalence of Needle-stick and Sharps Injuries among Healthcare Workers, Najran, Saudi Arabia. Epidemiology: Open Access. 2012: 117. DOI:10.4172/2161-1165.1000117. [CrossRef] 7. van der Maaten GC, Nyirenda M, Beadsworth MJ, Chitani A, Allain T, van Oosterhout JJ. Post exposure prophylaxis of HIV transmission after occupational injuries in Queen Elizabeth Central Hospital, Blantyre, Malawi, 2003-2008. Malawi Med J 2010; 22: 15-9. [CrossRef] 8. Lin C, Li L, Wu Z, Wu S, Jia M. Occupational exposure to HIV among health care providers: A Qualitative study in Yunnan, China. J Int Assoc Physicians AIDS Care (Chic) 2008; 7: 35-41. 9. Gumodoka B, Favot I, Berege ZA, Dolmans WM. Occupational exposure to the risk of HIV infection among health care workers in Mwanza Region, United Republic of Tanzania. Bull. Bull World Health Organization. 1997;75:133–140. 10. Abdel-Malek ZA, Kadekaro AL, Kavanagh RJ, Todorovic A, Koikov LN, McNulty JC, et al. Melanoma prevention strategy based on using tetrapeptide alpha-MSH analogs that protect human melanocytes from UV-induced DNA damage and cytotoxicity. FASEB J 2006; 20: 1561-3. [CrossRef] 11. Haiduven DJ, Simpkins SM, Phillips ES, Stevens DA. A survey of percutaneous/ mucocutaneous injury reporting in a public teaching hospital. Journal of Hosp Infect 1999; 41: 151-4. [CrossRef] 12. Sohn S, Eagan J, Sepkowitz KA. Safety engineered device implementation: does it introduce bias in percutaneous injury reporting? Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2004; 2