Dergiler / Eurasian Journal of Emergency Medicine / 2019 / Cilt: 18 - Sayı: 3

Stroke Patients with Sinus Rhythm and Atrial Fibrillation: Comparison of Echocardiography Findings

Sayfa
153–156
Yayın Tarihi
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

AF may be a consequence of multifactorial cardiac abnormalities that may have a causative effect for stroke.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Aim: To compare the echocardiographic findings in stroke patients with sinus rhythm and atrial fibrillation (AF).Materials and Methods: Descriptive, cross-sectional study.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Place and Duration of Study: Department of Emergency Medicine, AdıyamanUniversity Education and Research Hospital, from January 2014 to December 2016.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:AF may be a consequence of multifactorial cardiac abnormalities that may have a causative effect for stroke.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:2014 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

Aim: To compare the echocardiographic findings in stroke patients with sinus rhythm and atrial fibrillation (AF).Materials and Methods: Descriptive, cross-sectional study. Place and Duration of Study: Department of Emergency Medicine, AdıyamanUniversity Education and Research Hospital, from January 2014 to December 2016. Four hundred and sixty-seven subsequent strokepatients were admitted to the study. Data included demographic and echocardiographic findings. Patients are divided into the AF and sinusrhythm groups. Categorical variables were analyzed with the Fischer’s Exact Test and parametric variables with the Independent SamplesT Test.Results: AF patients with stroke had a significantly lower ejection fraction, decreased left ventricular function, increased left ventriculardiameters, systolic dysfunction, mitral valve insufficiency, and tricuspid valve insufficiency.Conclusion: AF patients with stroke had a significantly lower ejection fraction, decreased left ventricular function, increased left ventriculardiameters, systolic dysfunction, mitral valve insufficiency, and tricuspid valve insufficiency. AF should not be considered as a major cardiacrisk factor for stroke. AF may be a consequence of multifactorial cardiac abnormalities that may have a causative effect for stroke.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

TAYFUR, İ., ÇOLAK, Ş., AYDIN, H., AFACAN, M. A., ERDOĞAN, M. Ö., AYDIN, İ., ALGIN, A. (2022). Stroke Patients with Sinus Rhythm and Atrial Fibrillation: Comparison of Echocardiography Findings. Eurasian Journal of Emergency Medicine, Cilt: 18 - Sayı: 3, 153–156. https://ajindex.com/articles/508008

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (12)

  1. Miyasaka Y, Barnes ME, Gersh BJ, Cha SS, Bailey KR, Abhayaratna WP, et al. Secular trends in incidence of atrial fibrillation in Olmsted County, Minnesota, 1980 to 2000, and implications on the projections for future prevalence. Circulation. 2006;114:119-25
  2. Chugh SS, Havmoeller R, Narayanan K, Singh D, Rienstra M, Benjamin EJ, et al. Worldwide epidemiology of atrial fibrillation: a Global Burden of Disease 2010 Study. Circulation. 2014;129:837-47
  3. Krijthe BP, Kunst A, Benjamin EJ, Lip GY, Franco OH, Hofman A, et al. Projections on the number of individuals with atrial fibrillation in the European Union, from 2000 to 2060. Eur Heart J. 2013;34:2746-51
  4. Go AS, Hylek EM, Phillips KA, Chang Y, Henault LE, Selby JV, et al. Prevalence of diagnosed atrial fibrillation in adults: national implications for rhythm management and stroke prevention: the AnTicoagulation and Risk Factors in Atrial Fibrillation (ATRIA) Study. JAMA. 2001;285:2370-75
  5. Ohlmeier C, Mikolajczyk R, Haverkamp W, Garbe E. Incidence, prevalence, and antithrombotic management of atrial fibrillation in elderly Germans. Europace. 2013;15:1436-44
  6. Boriani G, Diemberger I, Martignani C, Biffi M, Branzi A. The epidemiological burden of atrial fibrillation: a challenge for clinicians and healthcare systems, Eur Heart J. 2006;27:893-4
  7. Camm AJ, Kirchhof P, Lip GY, Schotten U, Savelieva I, Ernst S, et al., Guidelines for the management of atrial fibrillation: the Task Force for the Management of Atrial Fibrillation of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Europace. 2010;12:1360-420
  8. Miyasaka Y, Barnes ME, Gersh BJ, Cha SS, Bailey KR, Abhayaratna WP, et al. Secular trends in incidence of atrial fibrillation in Olmsted County, Minnesota, 1980 to 2000, and implications on the projections for future prevalence. Circulation. 2006;114:119-25
  9. Boriani G, Maniadakis N, Auricchio A, Müller-Riemenschneider F, Fattore G, Leyva F, et al., Health technology assessment in interventional electrophysiology and device therapy: a position paper of the European Heart Rhythm Association. Eur Heart J. 2013;34:1869-74
  10. Krijthe BP, Kunst A, Benjamin EJ, Lip GY, Franco OH, Hofman A, et al., Projections on the number of individuals with atrial fibrillation in the European Union, from 2000 to 2060. Eur Heart J. 2013;34:2746-51
  11. Boriani G. The epidemiologic threat of atrial fibrillation: need for secondary, primary, and primordial prevention, Chest. 2015;147:9-10
  12. Freestone B, Lip GY. The