Dergiler / Eurasian Journal of Emergency Medicine / 2019 / Cilt: 18 - Sayı: 4

Defensive Medicine in the Emergency Department: A Cross-sectional Study from the Perspective of Emergency Medical Specialists

Sayfa
178–184
Yayın Tarihi
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

The practice of ascribing every adverse patient outcome to the physician must be abandoned, and stepsmust be taken toward finding a solution.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Aim: An increase in defensive medicine has recently been observed due to malpractice suits brought against physicians.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:This results inincreased medical costs, requests for unnecessary tests, or delays in the treatment of high-risk patients.Materials and Methods: Data were collected using an electronic questionnaire prepared by the authors following a review of the literatureand sent to participants via docs.google.com.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:The practice of ascribing every adverse patient outcome to the physician must be abandoned, and stepsmust be taken toward finding a solution.
🔬Tür:Uygulamalı Anket & Alan Araştırması
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

Aim: An increase in defensive medicine has recently been observed due to malpractice suits brought against physicians. This results inincreased medical costs, requests for unnecessary tests, or delays in the treatment of high-risk patients.Materials and Methods: Data were collected using an electronic questionnaire prepared by the authors following a review of the literatureand sent to participants via docs.google.com. Numerical data were expressed as mean plus standard deviation, and categorical data asnumber and percentage. The Mann-Whitney U and Kruskal-Wallis tests were employed for data analysis.Results: Men represented 67.9% (n=218) of the participants, and 70.7% (n=227) of our subjects were aged 24-35. In addition, 92.2% ofparticipants considered that both consultant physicians in emergency departments (ED) and emergency physicians tended to be defensivein their approach to patients. Our findings showed that 88.1% (n=283) of participants requested more tests and consultations from patientsarriving at the ED in order to avoid malpractice suits. Finally, 39.6% (n=127) of participants considered that emergency medicine specialistssought to avoid caring for complicated patients involving a greater workload in terms of tests, consultation, ED stay, and treatment.Conclusion: Defensive medicine is a growing global phenomenon. The most undesirable and dangerous aspect of defensive medicine isthat it also impacts on ED patients. The practice of ascribing every adverse patient outcome to the physician must be abandoned, and stepsmust be taken toward finding a solution.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

YILMAZ, S., TEKİN, E., DELİCE, O. (2022). Defensive Medicine in the Emergency Department: A Cross-sectional Study from the Perspective of Emergency Medical Specialists. Eurasian Journal of Emergency Medicine, Cilt: 18 - Sayı: 4, 178–184. https://ajindex.com/articles/507994

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (16)

  1. Hermer L, Brody H. Defensive Medicine, Cost Containment and Reform. J Gen Intern Med. 2010;25:470-3
  2. Tuers DM. Defensive Medicine in the Emergency Department Increasing Health Care Costs Without Increasing Quality? Nurs Adm Q. 2013;37:160-4
  3. Johnston WF, Rodriguez RM, Suarez D, Fortman J. Study of Medical Students’ Malpractice Fear and Defensive Medicine: A “Hidden Curriculum?”. West J Emerg Med. 2014;15:293-8
  4. Waxman DA, Greenberg MD, Ridgely MS, Kellermann AL, Heaton P. The Effect of Malpractice Reform on Emergency Department Care. N Engl J Med. 2014;371:1518-25
  5. Summerton N. Positive and Negative Factors in Defensive Medicine: a Questionnaire Study of General Practitioners. BMJ. 1995 310:27-9
  6. Smith TR, Habib A, Rosenow JM, Nahed BV, Babu MA, Cybulski G, et al. Defensive Medicine in Neurosurgery: Does State-Level Liability Risk Matter? Neurosurgery. 2015;76:105-14
  7. Yılmaz K, Polat O, Kocamaz B. Investigation of Defensive Medicine Practice from the Legal Angle. TAAD. 2014;5:19-51
  8. Li S, Brantley E. Malpractice Liability Risk and Use of Diagnostic Imaging Services: A Systematic Review of the Literature. J Am Coll Radiol. 2015;12:1403-12
  9. Dirnhofer R, Wyler D. Treatment Failure From the Viewpoint of Forensic Medicine. Ther Umsch. 1997;54:272-9
  10. Studdert DM, Mello MM, Adaçayı WM, DesRoches CM, Peugh J, Zapert K, et al. Defensive Medicine Among High-Risk Specialist Physicians in a Volatile Malpractice Environment. JAMA. 2005;293:2609-17
  11. Rodriguez R, Anglin D, Hankin A, Hayden SR, Phelps M, McCollough L, et al. A Longitudinal Study of Emergency Medicine Residents’ Malpractice Fear and Defensive Medicine. Acad Emerg Med. 2007;14:569-73
  12. Solaroglu I, Izci Y, Yeter HG, Metin MM, Keles GE. Health Transformation Project and Defensive Medicine Practice Among Neurosurgeons in Turkey. PLoS ONE. 2014;9:e111446
  13. Nahed BV, Babu MA, Smith TR, Heary RF. Malpractice Liability and Defensive Medicine: A National Survey of Neurosurgeons. PLoS One. 2012;7
  14. Büken NÖ, Büken E. Dıscussıons on Medıcal Malpractıces and Medıcal Ethıcs. T Klin J Med Ethics, Law and History. 2003;11:140-7
  15. Wong AC, Kowalenko T, Roahen-Harrison S, Smith B, Maio RF, Stanley RM. A Survey of Emergency Physicians’ Fear of Malpractice and İts Association With the Decision to Order Computed Tomography Scans for Children With Minor Head Trauma. Pediatr Emerg Care. 2011;27:182-5
  16. Brennan T. Overview of Legal İssues. Jt Comm J Qual Improv. 1993;19:319-21.